Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has predicted that Bitcoin will plummet to under $10,000 by 2050.
New York, United States – February 25, 2026 – Mintfunnel, a Coinbound Company / InsumerAPI delivers privacy-preserving proof of token and NFT ownership at $0.04 per verification — with triple-SDK agent tooling (MCP, LangChain, GPT Actions) and zero blockchain knowledge required for merchants InsumerAPI Launches Privacy-Preserving On-Chain Verification for Token-Gated Commerce The Insumer Model, the infrastructure platform that turns token holders into recognized customers with real-world perks, today announced InsumerAPI — a RESTful on-chain verification API that delivers cryptographically signed boolean proofs of token and NFT ownership without ever exposing wallet addresses, balances, or transaction histories. Built by Douglas Borthwick — a Wall Street veteran with 30+ years at Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, and Standard Chartered, and a pioneer in SEC-registered security token offerings — InsumerAPI is the sixth application in a complete production ecosystem that already includes: InsumerPass (customer verification) InsumerScanner (merchant POS) InsumerDashboard (business configuration) InsumerRegistry (open token database) InsumerExtension (Chrome browser integration) What InsumerAPI Does A single POST endpoint ( /v1/attest ) checks 1–10 conditions against a wallet across 31 blockchains and returns only signed booleans — met: true or met: false . The actual balance is never revealed. Every response carries an ECDSA P-256 signature that downstream systems — AI agents, merchants, auditors — can verify offline without re-querying the blockchain or repeatedly trusting the service. Merchant Economics For merchants, the economics are decisive: On-chain verification costs $0.02–$0.04 per scan Compared to $1–$5+ per click on Google or Meta ads Merchants onboard with zero blockchain knowledge, configure discount tiers through a dashboard or API, and integrate with existing payment processors such as: Stripe Square Clover Customers pay in dollars. Merchants receive dollars. Token ownership simply unlocks the discount. The First Fully Autonomous Agent Commerce Loop InsumerAPI is the only on-chain verification API where an AI agent can complete the entire merchant lifecycle autonomously — from API discovery to directory listing — with no human in the loop. An agent can: Read standard machine-readable files ( llms.txt , OpenAPI spec, ai-plugin.json ) Create an API key Browse the merchant directory Verify token holdings Generate signed discount codes Onboard new merchants Verify domain ownership Purchase credits with USDC on supported chains Publish to the public directory Every step is authenticated and cryptographically signed. Triple-SDK Agent Tooling Three published SDKs support autonomous AI agent integration: MCP Server Published to npm ( mcp-server-insumer ) Listed in the Official MCP Registry 16 tools covering all API endpoints LangChain Integration Published to PyPI ( langchain-insumer v0.1.2 ) Designed for Python AI agent frameworks 6 tools plus HTTP wrapper GPT Actions OpenAI function-calling integration via OpenAPI spec InsumerAPI Verify is live in the ChatGPT GPT Store Enables conversational verification of holdings for discounts or eligibility — no coding required No other Web3 MCP server, LangChain package, or GPT action in the market focuses on token-gated commerce, merchant verification, or merchant onboarding. The triple-SDK offering is unique in the space. Founder Quote “The missing piece in token-gated commerce was never the blockchain — it was the bridge to the real world,” said Douglas Borthwick, Founder of The Insumer Model . “An AI agent can now go from zero to a fully onboarded, domain-verified, directory-listed merchant without a single human touching a keyboard. Meanwhile, a SHIB holder walks into a coffee shop that recognizes SHIB holders, taps their phone, and gets 10% off — without the merchant ever knowing details of their wallet other than that they own enough SHIB to meet a tier threshold. That’s the insumer economy.” Pricing and Access InsumerAPI offers: Free Tier: 10 credits + 100 daily reads Pay-Per-Use: $0.04 per credit via USDC Pro Plan: $29/month (100 credits + 10,000 daily reads) Enterprise Plan: $99/month (500 credits + 100,000 daily reads) Merchants join free with 100 verification credits included. Links Developer documentation: https://insumermodel.com/developers Try the GPT: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-699c5e43ce2481918b3f1e7f144c8a49-insumerapi-verify MCP Server: https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-server-insumer LangChain: https://pypi.org/project/langchain-insumer/ Full platform and free book: https://insumermodel.com About The Insumer Model The Insumer Model provides privacy-preserving on-chain verification infrastructure for token-gated commerce. The platform enables businesses to recognize token and NFT holders with real-world discounts across 31 blockchains — no crypto payments, no wallet exposure, no data risk. Built by Douglas Borthwick, drawing from 30+ years in finance and pioneering work in tokenized securities, the platform bridges digital asset ownership to everyday commerce through six connected applications and a developer API with triple-SDK agent tooling. Media Contact Douglas C. Borthwick Email: press@insumermodel.com X: @theinsumermodel Website: https://insumermodel.com Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release for informational purposes only. It does not reflect the views of Times Tabloid, nor is it intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. The post The Insumer Model™ Launches On-Chain Verification API and Custom GPT — Enabling AI Agents to Bridge Token Ownership to Real-World Commerce Across 31 Blockchains appeared first on Times Tabloid .
Ether, solana and dogecoin are among the altcoins posting 10% or more advances.
Over $1.57 million in Dogecoin short positions were liquidated in 60 minutes, fueling a 10% price surge for the DOGE price.
Bitcoin hovers near $60,000 as short positions and negative funding rates intensify volatility. Analysts see potential for both sharp rebounds and renewed declines in the current environment. Continue Reading: Bitcoin Faces Volatility as Short Positions Surge and Funding Turns Negative The post Bitcoin Faces Volatility as Short Positions Surge and Funding Turns Negative appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: Final 72-Hour Window for Massive $680 Ticket Savings San Francisco, CA – February 24, 2025 – A critical deadline now approaches for founders, investors, and operators in the blockchain and technology sectors. The Super Early Bird pricing for Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026 concludes in just 72 hours, offering final savings of up to $680 on individual passes before rates increase permanently this Friday, February 27. This premier event, scheduled for October 13–15, 2026, at Moscone West, represents a pivotal convergence point for industry growth and deal-making. Historically, such early pricing tiers for major tech conferences have provided significant financial leverage for startups and individual professionals aiming to maximize their annual event budgets. Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: A Catalyst for Founder and Investor Growth The conference landscape for cryptocurrency and Web3 has evolved significantly since the early 2010s. Initially dominated by niche meetups, the sector now hosts large-scale, institutional events that drive tangible business outcomes. Bitcoin World Disrupt sits at the apex of this evolution. The event consistently attracts over 10,000 attendees, including founders actively scaling companies, operators managing growth, and investors deploying capital. The core value proposition extends beyond passive content consumption. Consequently, every session and networking opportunity is architecturally designed to accelerate attendee momentum and compound professional leverage within the competitive tech ecosystem. The Quantifiable Value of High-Signal Networking Data from the 2025 iteration of Disrupt provides concrete evidence of its networking efficacy. On-site, more than 20,000 curated one-on-one meetings took place, facilitated by proprietary matchmaking algorithms. For 2026, organizers promise upgraded digital tools to make these connections even more targeted and efficient. In venture capital and startup ecosystems, a single conversation can alter a company’s trajectory. This environment is deliberately engineered to create those pivotal moments. Attendees gain direct access to investors currently writing checks, exposure to emerging startups before market saturation, and tactical insights from operators navigating today’s complex macroeconomic climate. Stage and Speaker Analysis: Learning from Ecosystem Architects The speaker roster for Bitcoin World Disrupt has historically functioned as a leading indicator of industry trends. Past stages have featured category-defining leaders whose companies have shaped technological adoption. The 2025 event hosted over 250 tech and VC leaders across 200+ onstage conversations, spanning artificial intelligence, hardware, space technology, and startup growth mechanics. While the full 2026 agenda is still developing, the caliber is expected to match or exceed this benchmark. Analysis of past speaker lists reveals a strategic mix of venture capital partners from top-tier firms like Sequoia Capital and Forerunner Ventures, alongside CEOs from scaling unicorns and public tech companies, providing a 360-degree view of the building and funding landscape. Sample of Past Disrupt Speaker Roles and Affiliations Speaker Name Role Affiliation Sector Focus Roelof Botha Managing Partner Sequoia Capital Venture Capital Kirsten Green Founding Partner Forerunner Ventures Consumer Tech, E-commerce Aaron Levie Co-founder & CEO Box Enterprise Software, Cloud Tekedra Mawakana Co-CEO Waymo Autonomous Vehicles, AI Concurrent Events and Expanded Opportunities Beyond the main stage, Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026 encompasses several high-value satellite events that deepen the attendee experience. The Bitcoin World Founder Summit, occurring concurrently, offers a focused, full-day program for over 1,000 founders and investors. This summit zeroes in on practical growth, execution, and real-world scaling tactics. A separate early-bird offer for this summit, providing savings of up to $300 or 30%, expires on March 13, 2026. Furthermore, the legendary Startup Battlefield returns, featuring 200 pre-Series A companies competing for $100,000 in non-dilutive funding and unparalleled visibility. This competition has a proven track record, with alumni like Discord, Cloudflare, and Trello demonstrating its role as a launchpad for future industry leaders. Expo Hall Discovery and “Disrupt Week” Ecosystem The Expo Hall remains a powerhouse of innovation, hosting over 300 startup exhibitors. This space is not for passive observation but for active discovery and deal flow initiation. Attendees can explore new technology stacks, identify potential career moves or hires, and network within a concentrated pool of talent. To extend the impact, “Disrupt Week” officially runs from October 11 to 17, 2026. This period features independently organized side events across the San Francisco Bay Area, including breakfasts, cocktail hours, and founder meetups. These peripheral gatherings often foster the informal connections that lead to long-term partnerships and investments, effectively amplifying the value of the core ticket. Strategic Timing and Financial Implications of Early Registration The economics of professional conference attendance demand strategic planning. For bootstrapped startups and cost-conscious professionals, the Super Early Bird discount represents a direct reduction in operational overhead. Saving $680 on an individual pass or up to 30% on group passes can reallocate capital towards other critical business functions. Industry analysts note that early registration for flagship conferences also secures optimal access to ancillary scheduling systems, such as networking platform profiles and session booking tools, which often operate on a first-come, first-served basis. Therefore, acting before the February 27 deadline provides both financial and logistical advantages that diminish post-deadline. Conclusion The 72-hour window for Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026 Super Early Bird pricing is a time-sensitive opportunity for professionals committed to growth in the cryptocurrency and technology sectors. The event offers a multifaceted platform for education, networking, and discovery, backed by a history of high-impact outcomes. Securing a pass at the lowest available rate is a tactical business decision that provides immediate cost savings and positions attendees for maximum return on investment during the October event. With the deadline set for 11:59 p.m. PT on Friday, February 27, proactive registration is the definitive next step for those aiming to fundraise, hire, scale, or launch in the coming year. FAQs Q1: What is the exact deadline for the Super Early Bird ticket pricing? The Super Early Bird discount for Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026 ends on Friday, February 27, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time. Q2: How much can I actually save before the deadline? Individual pass holders can save up to $680. Group passes are discounted by up to 30% off standard rates. Q3: What is the difference between Bitcoin World Disrupt and the Bitcoin World Founder Summit? Bitcoin World Disrupt is the three-day main conference with a broad agenda. The Bitcoin World Founder Summit is a concurrent, focused, full-day event specifically tailored for founders and investors, requiring a separate registration with its own pricing deadline of March 13, 2026. Q4: What kind of networking opportunities are formally facilitated? The event utilizes a curated matchmaking system that facilitated over 20,000 meetings in 2025. Upgraded tools for 2026 aim to make investor-founder and peer-to-peer connections more targeted and efficient. Q5: Is there an opportunity for early-stage startups to participate beyond attending? Yes. The Startup Battlefield competition is open to 200 pre-Series A companies, offering them a chance to pitch for $100,000 in equity-free funding and significant exposure to investors and media. This post Bitcoin World Disrupt 2026: Final 72-Hour Window for Massive $680 Ticket Savings first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
The stablecoin issuer reported $770 million in revenue for the final 2025 quarter, beating forecasts as full-year sales rose 64% and USDC circulation topped $75 billion.
BitcoinWorld Jane Street BTC Sell-Offs: Explosive Theory Reignited by Glassnode Co-Founders Amid Terra Lawsuit Fallout In a dramatic development shaking cryptocurrency markets, Glassnode co-founders Jan Happel and Yann Allemann have reignited explosive allegations about Jane Street-led BTC sell-offs, connecting algorithmic trading patterns to Bitcoin’s recent volatility and the ongoing Terra lawsuit saga. This controversy resurfaced through their shared X account, Negentropic, sparking renewed debate about institutional influence on digital asset prices. Jane Street BTC Sell-Offs Theory Resurfaces Market analysts observed peculiar Bitcoin price movements throughout early 2025. Specifically, flash crashes occurred consistently at 10 a.m. U.S. Eastern Time. These sudden price drops attracted scrutiny from trading desks worldwide. Negentropic documented these patterns meticulously, noting their algorithmic precision. The account highlighted how each decline followed similar technical characteristics. Proponents of the theory identified several key patterns: Consistent timing: Daily sell-offs at exactly 10 a.m. U.S. Eastern Time Algorithmic signatures: Trading patterns suggesting automated execution Volume anomalies: Unusual selling pressure during typically stable periods Market impact: Disproportionate effect on Bitcoin’s overall price trajectory Financial data from multiple exchanges supported these observations. Trading logs showed synchronized selling across platforms. Market makers noticed unusual order book dynamics during these windows. The precision suggested institutional-scale operations rather than retail investor activity. Terra Lawsuit Connection and Market Impact The controversy gained substantial traction following Terraform Labs’ legal action. The bankrupt developer filed suit against Jane Street in February 2025. Allegations centered around TerraUSD (UST) and Luna (LUNA) collapse mechanisms. Court documents revealed complex trading relationships between the entities. Remarkably, the daily Bitcoin flash crashes ceased after lawsuit filings became public. Market data confirms this correlation clearly. Bitcoin’s price stabilized significantly in subsequent trading sessions. This timing coincidence fueled speculative analysis across cryptocurrency communities. Bitcoin Price Correlation Timeline Date Event BTC Price Change Jan 15-30, 2025 Daily 10 a.m. flash crashes -8.2% average drop Feb 3, 2025 Terraform Labs lawsuit filed Market announcement Feb 4-15, 2025 Post-lawsuit trading +14.7% recovery Feb 20, 2025 Negentropic analysis published Market discussion peak Legal experts note the lawsuit’s broader implications. Terraform Labs alleges market manipulation during critical periods. These claims intersect with Bitcoin trading pattern observations. Regulatory bodies monitor these developments closely for potential market abuse violations. Algorithmic Trading Mechanisms Explained Market-making firms like Jane Street employ sophisticated algorithms. These systems manage liquidity across multiple exchanges simultaneously. Under normal conditions, they facilitate efficient price discovery. However, certain configurations could theoretically create selling pressure patterns. Financial technology specialists identify several possible mechanisms: Risk management triggers: Automated responses to volatility thresholds Liquidity rebalancing: Scheduled adjustments to portfolio exposures Cross-market arbitrage: Simultaneous trades across correlated assets Derivative hedging: Options and futures position management Jane Street previously dismissed these allegations as baseless speculation. The firm maintains standard market-making operations follow regulatory guidelines. Company representatives emphasize their commitment to market integrity. They characterize the theories as misunderstanding institutional trading practices. Historical Context of Market Manipulation Theories Cryptocurrency markets frequently generate manipulation theories. The 2018 Bitcoin futures expiration phenomenon demonstrated similar patterns. Traders observed predictable price movements around CME contract settlements. Research papers later confirmed some correlation effects. Several historical precedents inform current analysis: 2017 Bitfinex-Tether controversies: Allegations about stablecoin issuance affecting Bitcoin 2019 spoofing cases: Documented manipulation through fake orders 2021 Elon Musk tweets: Social media influence on Dogecoin and Bitcoin 2023 FTX collapse: Exchange-specific trading advantages revealed Academic researchers approach these theories cautiously. Correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation. Multiple factors typically influence cryptocurrency prices simultaneously. Isolating single variables proves challenging in decentralized markets. Regulatory Environment and Compliance Standards United States regulators increased cryptocurrency market oversight significantly. The Securities and Exchange Commission expanded enforcement actions. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission clarified digital asset jurisdiction. Both agencies monitor potential manipulation schemes aggressively. Current regulatory frameworks address several relevant areas: Market surveillance: Exchange reporting requirements for large trades Whistleblower programs: Incentives for reporting manipulation Cross-border cooperation: International coordination on market abuse Algorithmic transparency: Proposed rules for trading bot disclosures Legal experts anticipate regulatory responses to these allegations. Potential investigations might examine trading records thoroughly. Evidence standards for manipulation cases remain stringent. Proving intentional misconduct requires substantial documentation. Technical Analysis and Market Data Examination Blockchain analytics firms provided additional context for these theories. Glassnode’s on-chain metrics revealed unusual transaction patterns. Large Bitcoin movements coincided with alleged selling periods. Exchange flow data showed corresponding deposit spikes. Key technical indicators supported further investigation: Miner outflow metrics: Tracking Bitcoin movements from mining entities Exchange net position changes: Measuring platform inventory fluctuations Whale wallet movements: Monitoring large holder transaction patterns Liquidity provider behavior: Analyzing market maker inventory management Quantitative analysts developed statistical models testing the theory. Some found statistically significant patterns in 10 a.m. price action. Others attributed movements to broader market factors. The academic community continues debating appropriate methodology. Industry Expert Perspectives and Reactions Financial professionals expressed diverse opinions about these allegations. Traditional market makers emphasized standard operational practices. Cryptocurrency traders noted unusual pattern persistence. Academics highlighted need for rigorous evidence collection. Several prominent voices contributed to the discussion: Market structure researchers: Emphasized need for transaction-level data Legal scholars: Discussed burden of proof in manipulation cases Exchange representatives: Noted surveillance system capabilities Quantitative analysts: Proposed alternative explanations for patterns The debate reflects broader tensions in cryptocurrency market development. Institutional participation increases market efficiency typically. However, concentrated influence risks manipulation possibilities. Balancing these factors remains an ongoing regulatory challenge. Conclusion The reignited theory about Jane Street-led BTC sell-offs highlights cryptocurrency market structure complexities. Glassnode co-founders identified compelling correlations between algorithmic trading patterns and Bitcoin price movements. The Terra lawsuit connection adds legal dimensions to financial analysis. Market participants now await further developments in both trading patterns and legal proceedings. Ultimately, transparent market operations benefit all cryptocurrency stakeholders through improved trust and stability. FAQs Q1: What evidence supports the Jane Street BTC sell-offs theory? Proponents point to consistent 10 a.m. flash crashes, algorithmic trading patterns, and the coincidence with Terra lawsuit filings. Market data shows unusual selling pressure during specific windows that ceased after legal actions became public. Q2: How does the Terra lawsuit connect to Bitcoin trading? Terraform Labs alleges market manipulation activities by Jane Street during the UST/LUNA collapse. The timing correlation between lawsuit filings and cessation of Bitcoin selling patterns suggests potential connections between these market events. Q3: What is Jane Street’s response to these allegations? Jane Street has consistently dismissed these claims as baseless, maintaining that their market-making operations follow standard practices and regulatory requirements. They attribute the theories to misunderstandings of institutional trading mechanisms. Q4: How do regulators view such market manipulation theories? Regulatory bodies like the SEC and CFTC monitor cryptocurrency markets for manipulation patterns. They employ sophisticated surveillance systems and investigate credible allegations, though proving intentional manipulation requires substantial evidence. Q5: What impact do these theories have on Bitcoin markets? Such allegations can increase market volatility as traders react to potential manipulation concerns. They also highlight the need for greater transparency in institutional cryptocurrency trading and more robust market surveillance systems. This post Jane Street BTC Sell-Offs: Explosive Theory Reignited by Glassnode Co-Founders Amid Terra Lawsuit Fallout first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Ripple’s Institutional Moment: U.S. National Bank License Could Unlock True Payment Rails for XRP Ripple, the San Francisco‑based blockchain payments company behind XRP, is reportedly on the verge of securing a U.S. national bank license, potentially as soon as Friday this week. Different sources suggest approval could come by Friday, a move that would allow Ripple to operate as a federally chartered bank and expand its institutional payment services. Ripple’s evolution goes beyond headlines, the company aims to shift from a crypto payments provider to a fully regulated financial infrastructure player within the U.S. banking system. A recent cryptic four aces post from a Ripple executive has fueled speculation that a banking charter could be imminent. In December 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval for Ripple’s proposed national trust bank charter, along with similar conditional nods for other crypto firms. These preliminary approvals signify federal regulators are willing to consider such licenses under enhanced oversight. Ripple’s Bank Charter Could Unlock XRP for Mainstream Finance A finalized national bank license would let Ripple operate under federal oversight, access Fedwire and potentially FedNow, and provide custody, settlement, and payment services for digital and traditional assets, embedding its technology directly into the core infrastructure of institutional finance. For XRP, the stakes are high. Ripple’s long-standing strategy positions XRP as a bridge asset in on-demand liquidity (ODL) solutions, enabling near-instant cross-border payments. A regulated bank license could integrate these tools directly with traditional financial systems, cutting out intermediaries and simplifying compliance. This marks a shift from speculative use toward institutional adoption, allowing banks, fintechs, and corporate treasuries to legally leverage XRP or Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, for scalable cross-border settlements. It reflects a broader trend: stablecoins and digital rails are increasingly seen as complements not alternatives to legacy systems. Ripple’s potential federal banking status signals a watershed moment, not just for XRP, but for how regulated institutions may connect with blockchain-based payment infrastructure in the future. Conclusion A U.S. national bank license for Ripple could transform institutional payments. XRP would tap directly into banking rails, enabling faster, more efficient cross-border transactions and bridging crypto with traditional finance. While adoption challenges remain, this milestone brings mainstream digital asset integration and institutional crypto payments closer than ever.
After climbing 6% to $1.44, XRP's upper Bollinger Band sits near $1.51, highlighting potential upside toward the $1.50 level on the daily chart.