LUNC's price jump follows a lawsuit filed Monday by Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator, boosted by spot-buying and a short squeeze.
Solana ( SOL ) is down another 2% on Friday, February 27, extending its monthly losses to over 32% and reflecting a broader risk-off drift across crypto markets further amplified by low trading volumes. As no major catalysts are in sight, traders expect the price action to remain range-bound in the near-term, and artificial intelligence ( AI ) models predict only a modest uptick by March 1. March 1 Solana price prediction Namely, Finbold consulted its AI-driven price prediction tool to generate a SOL price target for March 1. Blending inputs from ChatGPT , Grok, and DeepSeek Chat, the model outlined a tight range of positive outcomes. On average, the three large learning models estimate that Solana will trade at $89.47 by Sunday, suggesting a 3.5% jump from where it currently trades ($86.44). Average Solana price prediction for March 1. Source: Finbold DeepSeek Chat forecasts the highest price at $90.25, a possible 5.45% advance. ChatGPT sees it climbing 2.85% to $88.90, while Grok calls for a 3.25% gain and a price of $89.25. March 1 Solana price prediction according to large language models. Source: Finbold AI Solana technical analysis Technically, SOL is near its daily pivot point at $87.56 and between key Fibonacci retracement levels. The relative strength index ( RSI ) stands at a neutral 58.26, suggesting neither overbought nor oversold conditions. Solana technical analysis. Source: Finbold If Solana manages to hold above the 50% Fibonacci retracement level at $86.71, a retest of the 24-hour high near $88.90 predicted by ChatGPT could come into play. Conversely, a break below $86.71 would expose the 61.8% retracement level at $86.19, potentially opening the door to further short-term downside. For now, traders are closely watching whether Bitcoin ( BTC ) can stabilize above $67,500, a level that could help anchor sentiment and provide a near-term floor for altcoins, including SOL. Featured image via Shutterstock The post AI predicts Solana price for March 1, 2026 appeared first on Finbold .
Nvidia’s stellar results amplify the interplay between the tech and cryptocurrency markets. Bitcoin now displays strong correlation with technology indices amid rising AI and regulatory focus. Continue Reading: Nvidia’s Strong Results Push Bitcoin to Track Tech Indices More Closely The post Nvidia’s Strong Results Push Bitcoin to Track Tech Indices More Closely appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .
A shift in Ethereum’s derivatives flow on Binance is starting to hint at a possible change in market structure, even as ETH itself remains in a corrective phase. According to CryptoQuant contributor Darkfost, the Taker Buy Sell Ratio is no longer flashing the same persistent sell-side aggression that dominated as the asset pushed toward a new all-time high. Darkfost argues that the indicator offers a useful read on who is pressing harder in the futures market. “This indicator is effective for assessing directional dominance between market buy and sell orders executed on futures contracts. A ratio above 1 indicates buyer dominance, while a ratio below 1 suggests that selling aggressiveness is prevailing within transactional flows.” Ethereum Shows Fresh Bullish Shift That distinction mattered during Ethereum’s run toward record levels. In that period, Darkfost said, selling pressure in the futures market intensified at the same time, keeping the ratio consistently below its equilibrium level of 1. On Binance, the monthly Taker Buy Sell Ratio fell to 0.95, while the weekly average dropped even further to 0.92, pointing to a market where aggressive sellers were controlling the flow. Related Reading: Ethereum DeFi Warning: Vitalik Flags Oracles As A Hidden Time Bomb The backdrop is significant because derivatives now sit at the center of crypto price formation. Darkfost noted that the derivatives market accounts for nearly $65 billion in volume and plays a leading role in price discovery, making order-flow analysis increasingly important for reading the market beneath headline price action. In that context, a ratio stuck below 1 was more than a minor technical detail; it suggested that upside conditions were being undermined by persistent futures-led selling pressure. What makes the current setup more interesting is that the flow data has begun to improve before any obvious reversal in Ethereum’s spot chart. “On Binance, the weekly ratio has been hovering around the neutral threshold for the past two weeks. This shift is particularly notable as it diverges from ETH price action, which remains in a corrective phase. Daily spikes above 1.12 have even been recorded, reflecting episodes of aggressive market buying.” Related Reading: The $2,000 Fault Line: Why Ethereum’s Record Volatility Signals An Imminent Explosion That divergence is the core of the thesis. While ETH has yet to fully reflect it in price, the behavior of takers in the futures market is no longer uniformly defensive. The monthly average has also started to recover, climbing back to around 0.99. That still falls just short of clear buyer dominance, but it marks a meaningful improvement from the earlier stretch of sub-1 readings. Darkfost stops well short of calling a confirmed reversal. “Although this configuration still requires confirmation, it constitutes a constructive signal. A sustained move above 1 would mark a transition toward buyer dominance, potentially supporting a more favorable market dynamic for ETH in the short to medium term.” For now, the signal is less about declaring the correction over than about identifying a change in pressure. If the ratio can hold near neutral and then push decisively above 1, it would suggest that the market driving price discovery is beginning to lean back toward buyers. At press time, ETH traded at $2,028. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Gate has secured a Payment Institution license from the Malta Financial Services Authority, enabling the exchange to provide regulated payment services across the European Union. Gate announced on February 26, 2026, that its subsidiary, Gate Technology Ltd, received official authorization under the EU Second Payment Services Directive (PSD2). This achievement allows Gate to utilize passporting
BitcoinWorld US Dollar Strength Soars: Monthly Gains Fueled by Geopolitical Tensions and Hawkish Fed Stance NEW YORK, March 2025 – The US dollar is poised for significant monthly gains, a development that underscores the complex interplay between escalating global geopolitical tensions and a persistently hawkish Federal Reserve. This dual-force dynamic is reshaping currency valuations and sending ripples through international financial markets. Consequently, investors and policymakers are closely monitoring the dollar’s trajectory as a key indicator of global economic sentiment and risk appetite. US Dollar Strength Builds on Dual Catalysts The greenback’s recent ascent is not an isolated event. Instead, it represents a convergence of powerful macroeconomic and geopolitical currents. Historically, the US dollar functions as a primary safe-haven asset during periods of global uncertainty. Simultaneously, central bank policy divergence creates powerful yield-seeking flows. The current environment uniquely combines both factors, thereby creating a potent bullish case for the currency. Market data from major exchanges shows the Dollar Index (DXY) climbing steadily throughout the month. Analysts point to specific triggers. For instance, renewed tensions in Eastern Europe and the South China Sea have prompted capital flight from riskier assets. Furthermore, ongoing trade policy reviews between major economies are injecting volatility. This flight-to-safety trend naturally benefits the world’s primary reserve currency. Concurrently, the Federal Reserve’s communicated path for interest rates remains more aggressive than other major central banks, like the European Central Bank or the Bank of Japan. Factor Impact on USD Market Mechanism Geopolitical Risk Positive Safe-haven demand increases Fed Hawkishness Positive Higher yield吸引力 attracts capital Global Growth Concerns Positive/Negative Can boost safe-haven flows but hurt trade Federal Reserve Policy: The Hawkish Anchor The Federal Reserve’s stance remains a cornerstone of dollar strength. Recent statements and meeting minutes reveal a central bank focused on ensuring inflation sustainably returns to its 2% target. Despite some cooling in price data, officials have emphasized the need for continued vigilance. This commitment translates into a policy outlook that maintains higher interest rates for longer than markets had anticipated earlier in the year. As a result, the interest rate differential between the US and other nations widens. Higher US Treasury yields offer global investors a more attractive return on dollar-denominated assets. This dynamic, known as the “carry trade,” incentivizes capital inflows. For example, the yield on the 10-year US Treasury note has remained elevated compared to German Bunds or Japanese Government Bonds. Consequently, international investors exchange their local currencies for dollars to capture this yield advantage. This process creates consistent buying pressure on the USD. The Fed’s data-dependent approach means every economic release, from Non-Farm Payrolls to CPI reports, is scrutinized for clues on the policy path. Expert Analysis on Monetary Policy Divergence Dr. Anya Sharma, Chief Economist at the Global Monetary Institute, provides context. “The policy divergence story is critical,” she notes. “While the Fed signals patience, other central banks are either cutting rates or pausing their cycles due to weaker domestic growth. This divergence isn’t just about the absolute level of rates, but the direction and speed of change. It creates a self-reinforcing cycle for dollar demand.” Historical analysis supports this view, showing that periods of pronounced policy divergence, like the mid-2010s, often correlate with extended dollar bull runs. Geopolitical Tensions Amplify Market Volatility Beyond monetary policy, the global geopolitical landscape is providing a persistent bid for the dollar. Several flashpoints contribute to a heightened sense of risk among institutional investors. Regional conflicts disrupt supply chains and commodity flows, fostering economic uncertainty. Additionally, strategic competition between major powers influences trade and investment patterns. In such an environment, the US dollar’s liquidity and the perceived stability of US financial markets become paramount. Investors typically react to geopolitical shocks by reducing exposure to emerging market currencies and assets perceived as risky. They then allocate those funds to traditional safe havens. The process unfolds rapidly across currency, bond, and commodity markets. Key observable effects include: Capital Flight: Money moves out of regions directly or indirectly affected by tensions. Commodity Price Swings: Oil and gold often spike, affecting currency correlations. Increased Hedging: Multinational corporations buy dollars to hedge overseas exposure. This behavioral pattern directly increases demand for US dollars. The currency’s role in settling most global trade, particularly in energy, further cements its status during crises. Global Impact and Currency Market Reactions The dollar’s appreciation has immediate and widespread consequences. Major currency pairs reflect the shifting dynamics. For instance, the EUR/USD pair has trended lower, testing key support levels as the eurozone economy shows relative fragility. Similarly, the USD/JPY pair has risen, pressuring the Bank of Japan as it balances domestic inflation concerns with a weakening yen. Emerging market currencies face even stronger headwinds, as dollar strength increases the burden of their external dollar-denominated debt. Central banks in emerging economies often intervene in foreign exchange markets to slow their currencies’ depreciation. They may also be forced to raise interest rates defensively, potentially stifling domestic growth. The strong dollar also makes US exports more expensive on the global market, which could eventually weigh on American corporate earnings. However, it also helps to dampen imported inflation for the United States, providing a complex trade-off for policymakers. The net effect is a tightening of global financial conditions. Historical Precedent and Current Trajectory Examining history offers valuable perspective. Periods of synchronized geopolitical stress and monetary tightening, such as the early 1980s, often saw pronounced dollar rallies. The current situation differs in its specific drivers but shares the characteristic of compounding forces. Market technicians observe that the Dollar Index has broken above several key resistance levels, suggesting the momentum may have further room to run in the short term. However, analysts caution that reversals can be swift if either catalyst—geopolitics or Fed policy—shifts unexpectedly. Conclusion The US dollar’s path to monthly gains is firmly rooted in two powerful fundamentals: heightened global geopolitical tensions and a steadfastly hawkish Federal Reserve. These forces are driving safe-haven flows and yield-seeking capital into dollar assets. The resulting US dollar strength has profound implications for global trade, emerging market stability, and corporate profitability worldwide. Moving forward, market participants will vigilantly watch for de-escalation in geopolitical hotspots and any signals of a pivot in Federal Reserve rhetoric. For now, the confluence of these factors continues to provide a robust tailwind for the world’s primary reserve currency, reinforcing its pivotal role in the global financial system. FAQs Q1: What does a “hawkish Fed” mean for the dollar? A hawkish Federal Reserve indicates a policy bias toward raising interest rates or keeping them high to combat inflation. This makes dollar-denominated assets more attractive due to higher potential returns, increasing demand for the currency and boosting its value. Q2: Why is the dollar considered a safe-haven currency? The US dollar is considered a safe haven due to the size, depth, and relative stability of the US economy and financial markets, the dollar’s role as the world’s primary reserve currency, and the liquidity of US Treasury securities, which are seen as a virtually risk-free asset. Q3: How do geopolitical tensions typically affect currency markets? Geopolitical tensions increase uncertainty and perceived risk. Investors typically respond by selling assets and currencies from affected regions and moving capital into perceived safe havens like the US dollar, Swiss franc, or gold, causing those havens to appreciate. Q4: What is the Dollar Index (DXY)? The US Dollar Index (DXY) is a measure of the value of the United States dollar relative to a basket of six major world currencies: the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc. It is a key benchmark for the dollar’s overall strength. Q5: Can a strong dollar hurt the US economy? Yes, a strong dollar can have mixed effects. It helps curb inflation by making imports cheaper but can hurt US exporters by making their goods more expensive for foreign buyers, potentially reducing corporate profits and affecting sectors reliant on international trade. This post US Dollar Strength Soars: Monthly Gains Fueled by Geopolitical Tensions and Hawkish Fed Stance first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise, has pushed back on claims that trading firm Jane Street is behind Bitcoin’s recent slide, writing on X on February 26 that the downturn is “a classic crypto winter,” not a coordinated attack. His comments come as lawsuits and viral threads revive old fears about market manipulation just as Bitcoin is trading over 46% below its all-time high. Conspiracy Claims Collide With ETF Mechanics Speculation intensified after reports emerged that Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator had sued Jane Street in a Manhattan federal court, accusing the firm of using insider information before the May 2022 Terra-Luna collapse. According to the complaint, Jane Street withdrew 85 million TerraUSD from Curve’s 3pool minutes after Terraform removed 150 million UST, a sequence the suit claims accelerated the $40 billion collapse. Jane Street has denied the allegations, calling the case a “desperate attempt” to recover losses and blaming Terraform’s management for the failure. At the same time, some crypto analysts, including Bull Theory, alleged that Jane Street runs a “10 AM” sell algorithm to push Bitcoin lower and profit from derivatives. Bull Theory also pointed to an interim order from India’s Securities and Exchange Board accusing Jane Street entities of expiry-day index manipulation between January 2023 and March 2025, alleging thousands of crores in unlawful gains. The case is ongoing, and the firm has appealed. However, Hougan dismissed the narrative as misplaced. “The conspiracy theories are wild,” he wrote, arguing that Bitcoin is down because investors unwound long positions, reduced leverage, and rotated capital elsewhere. The Bitwise CIO also amplified colleague André Dragosch’s analysis of intraday Bitcoin performance since the ETF launch in January 2024. Dragosch’s data countered the viral 10 AM slam narrative by showing pronounced weakness around midnight ET, pointing to non-U.S. trading hours as the actual vulnerability period. Macro strategist Alex Krüger also echoed Hougan’s skepticism, calling the Jane Street theory “yet another viral and flawed conspiracy theory.” He noted that basis traders and authorized participants (APs) simply close gaps between ETFs, futures, and spot markets. “Too many doomer narratives and conspiracy theories looking for villains circulating right now,” Krüger posted. “Historically, that’s the kind of sentiment you see at bottoms.” Structural Questions Linger Beyond the Blame The controversy has also revived debate about ETF plumbing. ProCap CIO Jeff Park wrote on February 25 that concerns are less about a single firm and more about how APs operate under regulatory exemptions that allow in-kind creations and redemptions. In theory, APs can hedge ETF exposure with futures instead of buying spot Bitcoin directly, which critics argue could dull spot demand. None of the lawsuits or regulatory filings so far establish coordinated misconduct in Bitcoin markets. Still, the overlap between large quantitative firms, derivatives strategies, and ETF mechanics has fueled suspicion during a downturn. For Hougan, the explanation is simpler. Bitcoin’s four-year cycle, leverage resets, and shifting investor priorities are enough to explain the pullback. “This is a classic crypto winter and there will be a classic crypto spring,” he wrote. “People want someone to blame — I get it — but the reality is far more boring than that.” The post Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan Rejects Jane Street Blame for Bitcoin Dip appeared first on CryptoPotato .
The Financial Conduct Authority has selected four firms to join its stablecoin sandbox as the UK moves closer to finalizing rules for digital assets pegged to fiat currencies. The regulator said the cohort will test proposed requirements in a controlled environment before a broader regime takes effect. The four firms chosen are Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, Revolut and VVTX. The FCA received 20 applications and narrowed the list to projects it said reflect different stablecoin use cases, including payments, settlement and crypto trading. Testing is scheduled to begin in the first quarter of 2026. Participants will operate under their existing permissions and registrations while the regulator observes how issuance, custody and reserve management function under draft rules. Stablecoin models and use cases under review Monee Financial Technologies plans to focus on settlement infrastructure. The firm aims to support cross border issuance, trading and settlement of digital securities using stablecoin rails. It also takes part in wider industry initiatives linked to financial market infrastructure. ReStabilise is developing a UK based issuance and custody platform for pound sterling and other currency stablecoins. The company targets institutional clients and offers stablecoins as a service, allowing financial firms to issue tokens backed by reserves. Revolut intends to test a pound denominated stablecoin designed to maintain a one to one value with sterling. The token would be backed by pound reserves and integrated into the firm’s existing financial and crypto ecosystem. Regulatory goals and broader UK context VVTX is building a UK based ecosystem that connects traditional finance with blockchain infrastructure. Its project includes a pound stablecoin and payment functionality tied to consumer card services. The FCA said the sandbox will help it assess consumer protection, financial stability and operational resilience before final rules take effect. The regulator has outlined plans to supervise issuers, require appropriate reserve backing and set standards for safeguarding client funds. The UK government has signaled support for a regulated stablecoin framework as part of its broader digital asset strategy. Through the sandbox, the FCA will collect data and practical feedback to refine its approach before stablecoins move into full scale deployment under UK law.
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $67,000 Amidst Market Uncertainty Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant correction on March 25, 2025, as the flagship digital asset, Bitcoin (BTC), saw its price fall decisively below the $67,000 threshold. According to real-time data from Bitcoin World market monitoring, BTC is currently trading at $66,954.91 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market. This movement represents a notable shift in the short-term trajectory of the world’s largest cryptocurrency, prompting analysis from traders and institutions worldwide. Consequently, market participants are scrutinizing liquidity flows and macroeconomic indicators for directional clues. Bitcoin Price Action and Immediate Market Context The descent below $67,000 marks a key psychological level for Bitcoin traders. Furthermore, this price point had previously acted as both support and resistance throughout early 2025. Market data reveals increased selling volume on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase during the Asian trading session. Simultaneously, the global cryptocurrency market capitalization dipped by approximately 2.5% in the last 24 hours. Technical analysts immediately noted the breach of several short-term moving averages. However, long-term trend indicators remain in a neutral to cautiously optimistic state for many observers. Several concurrent factors provide context for this price movement. Firstly, traditional equity markets showed weakness, with the S&P 500 futures indicating a lower open. Secondly, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) experienced a modest rally, often creating headwinds for dollar-denominated assets like Bitcoin. Additionally, blockchain analytics firm Glassnode reported a slight increase in Bitcoin moving from ‘illiquid’ to ‘liquid’ entities, suggesting some profit-taking or repositioning by longer-term holders. This on-chain data provides evidence of changing holder behavior during volatility. Historical Volatility and Comparative Analysis Bitcoin’s current volatility fits within its established historical pattern. For instance, a 5-10% intraday move is not uncommon for the asset. A comparative analysis against previous cycles is instructive. In the 2021 bull market, similar corrections of 20-30% occurred regularly before the asset resumed its upward trend. The table below illustrates recent notable Bitcoin corrections and their subsequent market behavior: Date Price Drop Key Trigger Recovery Time Jan 2023 -20% FTX Contagion 4 months Aug 2023 -15% SEC Delay on ETF 6 weeks Jan 2024 -12% GBTC Sell Pressure 3 weeks Mar 2025 -8% (ongoing) Macro Uncertainty TBD This historical perspective demonstrates that pullbacks are a common feature of Bitcoin’s market structure. Moreover, each correction has unique catalysts and recovery profiles. The current dip appears milder in magnitude compared to previous events driven by specific crypto industry crises. Therefore, many analysts categorize this as a healthy market consolidation. Expert Insights on Market Structure and Liquidity Market microstructure experts point to derivatives market activity for clues. Open Interest (OI) in Bitcoin futures declined slightly during the move, which typically suggests the unwind of leveraged positions rather than the initiation of aggressive new short bets. Funding rates across perpetual swap markets also normalized from slightly positive to neutral. This data indicates a cooling of excessive bullish speculation. Veteran trader and analyst, whose commentary often appears in CoinDesk and The Block, noted, ‘The market is efficiently clearing out weak leverage. This is a necessary process for establishing a stronger foundation for the next leg.’ Such analysis aligns with the view that controlled corrections prevent larger, more destabilizing crashes. On-chain analyst Willy Woo’s metrics, often cited for assessing investor cohorts, show miner outflow has remained stable. This suggests no forced selling from this foundational network group. Additionally, exchange net flows have been relatively balanced, avoiding the massive inflow spikes that often precede steeper declines. The evidence from these multiple data layers paints a picture of a technical correction within an ongoing macro trend, not a fundamental breakdown. Macroeconomic Backdrop and Regulatory Developments The broader financial ecosystem inevitably influences cryptocurrency valuations. Recently, Federal Reserve commentary has leaned slightly more hawkish regarding inflation persistence. Bond yields have ticked upward, pressuring risk assets across the board. Bitcoin, increasingly viewed as a ‘risk-on’ asset by institutional portfolios, often correlates negatively with real yields in the short term. This macroeconomic pressure provides a plausible external catalyst for the current price weakness. Simultaneously, the regulatory landscape continues to evolve. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations are now fully implemented, providing clarity but also imposing new compliance costs. In the United States, legislative progress on a comprehensive crypto framework remains slow. This regulatory uncertainty can contribute to investor caution. Key developments to monitor include: ETF Flows: Daily net flows into U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs. Fed Policy: Upcoming Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings and statements. On-Chain Metrics: Realized Price, MVRV Z-Score, and Supply in Profit. These factors collectively create the environment in which Bitcoin’s price discovery occurs. The Impact on Altcoins and Broader Crypto Sector Bitcoin’s dominance rate, its share of the total crypto market cap, often increases during market downturns. This phenomenon, known as a ‘flight to quality,’ was observed during the recent move. Major altcoins like Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Cardano (ADA) generally experienced larger percentage declines than Bitcoin. This pattern highlights Bitcoin’s role as the benchmark reserve asset for the digital economy. Consequently, traders watch BTC’s stability as a precursor to altcoin market recovery. The deleveraging in derivatives markets also affected altcoin futures, with some experiencing more pronounced liquidations due to their inherently higher volatility profiles. Conclusion The Bitcoin price falling below $67,000 represents a meaningful but historically consistent market event. Analysis of derivatives data, on-chain metrics, and macroeconomic conditions suggests this is a technical correction within a complex financial landscape. The move has effectively reduced excessive leverage and realigned short-term sentiment. For long-term investors, such volatility underscores the importance of robust risk management and a focus on Bitcoin’s fundamental network strengths—its decentralized security, predictable monetary policy, and growing institutional adoption. The market now watches for a consolidation phase and the development of a new support level, which will be critical for determining the next directional trend for the flagship cryptocurrency. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin fall below $67,000? The decline appears driven by a combination of technical selling after failing to hold higher levels, a slight shift toward hawkish Federal Reserve expectations, and the unwinding of leveraged long positions in derivatives markets. Q2: Is this a good time to buy Bitcoin? Investment timing depends on individual strategy. Some view corrections as potential accumulation zones, while others wait for confirmed trend reversal signals. Always conduct personal research and consider risk tolerance. Q3: How does this drop compare to past Bitcoin crashes? This is a relatively mild correction in historical terms. Past crashes, often triggered by specific exchange failures or regulatory shocks, have exceeded 50% declines. The current move is within the range of typical bull market pullbacks. Q4: Will altcoins recover if Bitcoin stabilizes? Historically, altcoin markets tend to stabilize and rally after Bitcoin establishes a clear support level and its dominance stops rising. However, each cycle and altcoin project has unique fundamentals. Q5: What key price levels should traders watch now? Traders are monitoring the previous support zone around $65,000. A hold above this area could suggest strength, while a break below might target the next significant support near $60,000. Resistance is now seen near the $69,000 to $70,000 region. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $67,000 Amidst Market Uncertainty first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
US spot BTC ETFs recorded a weekly inflow of 1.02 billion $, reversing the 5-week outflow. BlackRock IBIT leads, ETH/SOL/XRP also positive. BTC at $66,912 on supports; PERP recovered, GD Culture wi...