Kryptowährungen News - Aktuelle Krypto Kurse

Best Crypto Exchanges of 2026 So Far – Mid-January Market Leaders

vor 6 Tagen

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you click a link and make a purchase or sign up for a service, Bitcoin.com may receive a commission. Our editorial content is independent and based on objective analysis. As 2026 begins, the top crypto exchanges are setting a strong tone for the year ahead, continuing to raise

Crypto whales shift to low-priced BSC, Solana tokens as BTC, ETH consolidate

vor 6 Tagen

Cryptocurrency whales are supposedly rotating capital into low-priced tokens on the Binance Smart Chain and Solana networks, causing short-term price movements in several micro-cap assets, according to blockchain analytics and market data reviewed by Santiment on Friday. While Bitcoin and Ethereum are still locked in consolidation price ranges near their weekly highs, traders are placing their money on altcoins. At the time of this reporting, Bitcoin was trading slightly above $95,000, and Ethereum was holding near $3,300. 🗣️ The stories generating the biggest headlines across social media Thursday, are: ❌ InfoFi Project Ban: X has banned InfoFi crypto projects like Kaito, Cookie, and Xeet from using its API to stop spam and AI-generated low-quality content. Head of Product Nikita Bier revoked… pic.twitter.com/Okq5eCAOFu — Santiment (@santimentfeed) January 15, 2026 Despite Bitcoin briefly surging beyond $97,000, its market structure is more range-bound and does not have a clear trend. Fartcoin struggles to sustain bull run, BSC tokens count 700% price profits Santiment data shows that Fartcoin was the most accumulated token by smart money over the last 24 hours. The Solana-based token, however, failed to sustain its January 14 surge above the $0.45 resistance zone, slipping below both its seven-day and 30-day simple moving averages. According to TradingView’s technical indicators, analysis on the Moving Average Convergence Divergence histogram is flashing sell signals, which could mean its upside momentum is fading. FARTCOIN’s Relative Strength Index reading has clocked 46, a figure that suggests the token was neither oversold nor showing signs of a relief bounce before it fell 2.23% in the last 24 hours, leaving room for further downside. On Binance Smart Chain, memecoins Formula 1, trading under the ticker CHAMPAGNE, and Trump Mog had whopping gains of 1,099% and 719%, respectively, in the 24 hours. According to CoinMarketCap, the top-performing memecoins in the last day included U and BYTE, which posted gains exceeding 117%, while ATLAS and EGL1 climbed more than 50%. RIZZMAS, HOSICO, and SORA advanced with profits from 24% to over 40%. Several wallets are now purchasing low-priced BSC tokens within a narrow time window, although trading volume is modest across the board. Macro crypto backdrop is whale-driven, CryptoQuant analysts say The current market is in a consolidation phase built up by structural rebuilding, according to two CryptoQuant contributors. The underlying bias may be conditionally bullish, but short-term overheating risks are still in play, which may be making traders think twice about following through on a buying spree on large-cap assets. CryptoQuant’s spot and futures taker charts show that retail activity is subdued, while large coin holders are exerting their influence with “Big Whale Orders.” Fewer retail traders mean whales are deploying capital more tactically toward low-liquidity assets, hopeful that smaller inflows will generate disproportionate price moves. The crypto market has added about $120 billion in total capitalization since the start of this business week, aided by a 6% price uptrend in the largest coin by market cap. January has witnessed political impacts that have surprisingly helped digital assets count positives, including the US invasion of Venezuela and the stalling of a Senate-sponsored market bill markup . Bitcoin’s rally has been supported by strong ETF inflows and institutional demand, pushing its market capitalization closer to benchmarks seen in special metals, silver, and gold. At the same time, Ethereum staking reached a record level of 36 million ETH locked. On the derivatives markets side of the analysis, around 25,000 Bitcoin options contracts are set to expire today with a notional value near $2.4 billion. Although the amount is slightly larger than the previous week’s expiry, Crypto Twitter expects a muted impact on spot markets and an even slower day in derivatives trading. The 90-day Spot Taker CVD has changed back to Taker Buy Dominant, showing holders are persistently buying even though most tokens have a moot price appreciation. This behavior implies that sell-side pressure is constrained and available supply is being absorbed at lower levels. “My understanding is that there’s a possibility for us to touch the $93.8K area again, which is the Trader Realized Price at the moment. For a good and healthy market environment, Bitcoin has to hold this level for us to find new highs again. That said, it’s totally healthy and nothing out of the normal if we have this retest, but it may not happen as well,” said Julio Moreno, CryptoQuant head of research. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Premier League Betting with Crypto: Best Sites and Markets for 2026

vor 6 Tagen

The Premier League remains the most liquid and closely watched football betting market in the world. Every match attracts global action, sharp money, and constant market movement. Margins are tight, information is priced in quickly, and execution matters more here than almost anywhere else. That reality explains why betting on football using cryptocurrency is gaining momentum among experienced bettors. Crypto allows faster deposits, quicker withdrawals, and fewer friction points during peak betting hours. For Premier League markets, where timing often decides value, that difference is far from marginal. As we move toward 2026, crypto is no longer just an alternative payment method. For many EPL bettors, it has become part of a more efficient betting workflow. Best Crypto Sportsbooks for Premier League Betting in 2026 Choosing the right platform is critical when betting on the Premier League. Market depth, execution speed, and stability during live action matter more than flashy promotions. Below are crypto sportsbooks that consistently perform well across EPL markets. Dexsport Dexsport approaches Premier League betting from a different angle. Instead of adapting crypto to traditional sportsbook infrastructure, the platform is built around blockchain-native execution from the start. This distinction becomes especially important in fast-moving football markets. For Premier League bettors, Dexsport offers: instant crypto deposits without custodial delays real-time balance updates during active sessions stable execution across pre-match and live EPL markets Because the platform operates without mandatory identity verification, bettors can focus entirely on market timing and decision-making. This structure aligns naturally with soccer betting with crypto, where speed and flexibility often matter more than promotional extras. Cloudbet Cloudbet is built for bettors who prioritize limits and market depth. Premier League coverage is extensive, with strong liquidity across match odds, totals, handicaps, and player props. The platform supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies and processes withdrawals quickly, often automatically. For serious bettors looking for reliability and scale, Cloudbet remains one of the most respected crypto football betting sites in the market. BetPanda BetPanda takes a different approach, focusing on simplicity and privacy. The platform allows fast crypto deposits and withdrawals and operates with minimal friction, making it appealing to bettors who value discretion. Premier League markets are available across major fixtures, and while depth may not match high-limit platforms, the experience is smooth and straightforward. Among modern soccer betting sites, BetPanda stands out for its no-KYC-first model and clean interface. Lucky Block Lucky Block combines aggressive bonuses with a modern user experience. EPL betting is supported alongside a broad sportsbook offering, and crypto payouts are typically processed quickly. The platform is best suited for active bettors who value promotions and flexibility. While some features are still evolving, Lucky Block remains a popular choice for those who enjoy a fast-paced betting environment during Premier League matchdays. BetOnline BetOnline represents a more traditional sportsbook model with added crypto support. Premier League coverage includes early lines, standard markets, and live betting options. While the interface feels less modern, the platform’s consistency and long track record appeal to bettors who prefer familiarity alongside cryptocurrency payments. What to Look for in a Premier League Crypto Sportsbook Premier League betting exposes weaknesses in platforms very quickly. High match volume, intense live action, and global liquidity leave little room for slow execution or unstable markets. When evaluating sportsbooks for EPL betting, experienced users typically focus on: speed of bet confirmation during live play stability of odds close to kickoff consistency of cash-out behavior depth across secondary markets and props In this environment, design and infrastructure matter more than surface-level features. Crypto-native platforms tend to handle these pressures better, especially during high-traffic match windows. What to Look for in a Premier League Crypto Sportsbook Premier League betting quickly separates well-built platforms from average ones. High liquidity and constant market movement leave very little room for technical weakness. Execution speed is the first thing experienced bettors notice. Bets must be accepted instantly, especially close to kickoff or during live play. Even minor delays can turn a value position into a missed opportunity. Market depth matters just as much. A strong EPL sportsbook should offer more than just match odds. Asian handicaps, alternative lines, team totals, and player-related markets allow bettors to adapt strategies rather than force bets. Live betting stability becomes critical during high-traffic matches. Platforms that freeze markets too often or struggle with real-time updates lose trust quickly. Stability under pressure is often more important than flashy features. Finally, cash-out behavior reveals a lot about a sportsbook’s infrastructure. Consistent availability and fair pricing during live matches indicate that the platform can handle dynamic football markets without manual interference. Why Crypto Works Better for EPL Than Traditional Payments Premier League betting is global by nature. Fans and bettors participate from every region, often across multiple time zones and currencies. Crypto removes many of the barriers that come with traditional banking systems. Speed is another decisive factor. Crypto transactions settle faster, allowing bettors to move funds in and out without waiting on intermediaries. This efficiency fits naturally with soccer betting with crypto, where timing often defines success. Just as important is reduced friction. Fewer payment blocks, fewer delays, and fewer manual checks create a smoother experience overall. For active EPL bettors, this consistency often outweighs minor differences in odds or bonuses. Live Betting and Micro-Markets in the Premier League Live betting has become the core of Premier League wagering. Many bettors wait for in-game dynamics rather than committing before kickoff. Micro-markets play a central role: Cards markets react instantly to referee style and match intensity. Corners offer frequent opportunities tied to tactical shifts. Player props reflect form, positioning, and momentum in real time. These markets move quickly and reward platforms that can process bets without hesitation. This is where online crypto football betting consistently outperforms slower systems, offering smoother execution and fewer rejected wagers during key moments. How Premier League Betting Is Evolving Toward 2026 The direction of EPL betting is clear. More action is shifting toward live environments, with bettors reacting to data rather than pre-match narratives. Expect: a heavier focus on in-play betting expanded data-driven markets and player metrics significantly lower tolerance for delays or platform instability As markets become more efficient, infrastructure quality will matter more than promotional incentives. Speed, transparency, and reliability are moving from “nice-to-have” to essential. Conclusion Premier League betting is no longer just about finding the right odds. It’s about how efficiently a platform allows bettors to act on information. This is why football crypto betting is no longer an alternative — it’s becoming the default choice for serious EPL bettors. Crypto-based platforms offer faster execution, smoother live betting, and fewer structural limitations. Looking ahead to 2026, choosing the right sportsbook will depend less on surface-level features and more on how well the platform handles live pressure, market depth, and transaction flow. Bettors who prioritize these fundamentals will be best positioned as Premier League betting continues to evolve.

Ethereum On Fire: User Growth Sparks Massive Activity Spike

vor 6 Tagen

Ethereum’s on-chain activity has jumped sharply, driven by a wave of first-time users and heavier transaction flow across the network. According to Glassnode, new activity retention roughly doubled this month — rising from about 4 million to around 8 million addresses — a move that points to a fresh cohort of wallets interacting with Ethereum rather than just repeat users. Related Reading: Bitcoin’s New Power Buyers: Companies Bought 3 Times What Miners Produced Surge In New Users Daily transactions hit a record high of 2.8 million on Thursday, a figure that is up 125% from the same period last year. Based on reports from Etherscan, active addresses have more than doubled year-over-year, moving from roughly 410,000 accounts to over 1 million as of Jan. 15. Those numbers suggest real, broad-based engagement is increasing, not merely short-lived spikes. Ethereum’s Month-over-Month Activity Retention shows a sharp spike in the “New” cohort, indicating a surge in first-time interacting addresses over the past 30 days. This reflects a notable influx of new wallets engaging with the Ethereum network, rather than activity being… pic.twitter.com/h8Zw7hXOSX — glassnode (@glassnode) January 15, 2026 Transaction Boom And L2 Effects Observers link the transaction growth in part to rising stablecoin activity and lower fees. Reports have disclosed that many transfers are migrating execution to Layer 2 networks while settlement stays on Ethereum’s main chain, which keeps finality secure and helps push down gas costs. Staking has also climbed, reaching nearly 36 million ETH, adding another layer to the network’s tightening supply dynamics. At the same time, market behavior remains careful. Strength in US equities has helped stabilize crypto prices, yet money flowing into Ethereum looks selective rather than broad. It seems that positioning is rather conservative; traders prefer waiting for more accurate signals regarding ETH prices instead of attempting to predict a breakout. In turn, ETH is consolidating around a correction, but there is not enough momentum-driven buying. Analyst Views & Price Movement There were also those who cited optimism based on improvements to on-chain fundamentals. For instance, LVRG Research reported that the increasing number of transactions and staking activities encouraged a positive network. Some traders argue the compression in price action could precede a breakout. Ether traded near a two-month high of $3,400 on Wednesday and was around $3,300 in early trading on Friday, reflecting the tug of war between renewed demand and persistent caution. Despite the stronger metrics, technical hurdles remain. Reports and recent analysis suggest the market is in a repair phase, not a confirmed uptrend. Overhead supply still constrains sustained advances, and many market participants want to see ETH reclaim key long-term resistance levels, such as the 200-day EMA, before committing large-scale capital. That explains why short-term traders operate inside a defined range while longer-term players hold back. Related Reading: Ethereum Staking Hits Record Levels As Buterin Urges Builders To Deliver Real Apps What This Means For Traders And Investors Network health has improved materially — more users, more transactions, and higher staking — but price action has not yet matched those gains. Based on the data presented, cautious optimism is reasonable. Traders may find chance to trade the range, while investors looking for conviction should wait for cleaner technical confirmation before assuming a sustained rally. Featured image from Blockzeit/EthBurn, chart from TradingView

Senators Signal Progress On Crypto Market Structure Bill Amid Key Vote Delay

vor 6 Tagen

Despite a surprising postponement of the markup for the crypto market structure bill known as the CLARITY Act, lawmakers are maintaining a hopeful outlook for the passage of the legislation. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott announced the delay on Wednesday, stating that bipartisan negotiations are ongoing. He characterized the pause as tactical rather than indicative of failure. Coinbase CEO Voices Alarm Over CLARITY Act’s Potential Impact In a message on social media platform X (previously Twitter), Scott expressed confidence, noting , “I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith.” In an interview with Fox News prior to the cancellation of the markup, Scott noted that the Republican Party has made significant efforts to incorporate bipartisan support into the legislation. “We’ve taken over 90 of the Democrats’ priorities and filtered them,” he explained. Scott highlighted key issues, such as anti-money laundering (AML) measures, which are important to both parties, aligning on national security concerns. However, the momentum faced a setback when Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew the company’s support for the CLARITY Act in its current form. Armstrong raised concerns that the bill could prohibit tokenized equities, impose restrictions on decentralized finance (DeFi), and expand government access to financial data at the expense of individual privacy. The executive also cautioned that the legislation could shift power from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and eliminate stablecoin rewards, potentially sidelining crypto competition. Crypto Czar Urges Industry To Resolve Differences Following the postponement of the vote, White House crypto czar David Sacks urged the industry to use this delay to address any remaining disagreements. “Passage of market structure legislation remains as close as it’s ever been,” Sacks stated on X. The Trump administration continues to express a commitment to collaborating with Scott, the Senate Banking Committee, and industry stakeholders to advance bipartisan crypto legislation as swiftly as possible. Although the specifics of the bill are still under negotiation, there is widespread consensus among both asset managers and experts that federal intervention is crucial not only for the growth of cryptocurrency but also for consumer protection . Kyle Wool, CEO of Dominari Securities, shared his perspective, stating, “As newer, more fringe industries grow and capital increases, there will be a greater need for oversight from regulators.” He outlined that proper regulations should not stifle innovation but instead ensure that markets remain fair, honest, and efficient for all investors. Wool added that such measures would also make the crypto market accessible to a broader audience, enhancing liquidity and depth. Pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis, who has been an advocate for the growth and development of the digital asset industry, asserted that lawmakers are now “closer than ever,” with ongoing negotiations leaning toward a bipartisan agreement. Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Moldova Crypto Legislation: A Strategic Leap Toward EU’s MiCA Framework Compliance

vor 6 Tagen

BitcoinWorld Moldova Crypto Legislation: A Strategic Leap Toward EU’s MiCA Framework Compliance CHISINAU, Moldova – In a significant regulatory development, Moldova announces plans to enact comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation this year, strategically aligning with the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. This move positions the Eastern European nation at the forefront of regional digital asset regulation while maintaining crucial distinctions about cryptocurrency’s legal status. Moldova’s Strategic Crypto Legislation Framework Moldovan Finance Minister Andrian Gavrilita confirmed the government’s commitment to creating a legal structure for cryptocurrency activities. The legislation specifically enables citizens to legally hold and trade crypto assets. However, Minister Gavrilita clarified that the framework will not recognize cryptocurrencies as official payment methods. This distinction maintains alignment with European regulatory approaches while providing essential legal clarity. The government currently collaborates with financial regulators to develop appropriate implementation mechanisms. Although the exact legislative timeline remains uncertain, authorities emphasize their dedication to completing the process this year. This regulatory development represents Moldova’s proactive approach to emerging financial technologies rather than reactive prohibition. Understanding the EU’s MiCA Regulatory Framework The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation establishes Europe’s first comprehensive cryptocurrency framework. MiCA creates uniform rules across EU member states for crypto-asset service providers and issuers. The regulation specifically addresses consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability concerns. MiCA’s implementation timeline spans 2024-2025, with full application expected by December 2025. Moldova’s alignment demonstrates strategic foresight despite its non-EU membership status. The nation maintains a European Union Association Agreement since 2014, creating natural regulatory convergence incentives. This legislative move potentially facilitates future economic integration while addressing immediate domestic cryptocurrency market needs. Comparative Analysis: Moldova’s Approach Versus Regional Models Country Regulatory Status Payment Recognition EU Alignment Moldova Legislation in Development Not Recognized MiCA Framework Romania Existing Regulations Limited Recognition MiCA Implementation Ukraine Legalized 2021 Not Legal Tender Independent Framework Georgia Liberal Approach Tax Clarifications Non-EU Model This comparative perspective highlights Moldova’s distinctive regulatory positioning. The nation balances innovation facilitation with consumer protection priorities. Regional analysis reveals varying approaches to cryptocurrency integration within national financial systems. Economic Implications for Moldova’s Financial Ecosystem Moldova’s cryptocurrency legislation carries substantial economic implications. The framework potentially attracts digital asset businesses seeking regulatory certainty. Furthermore, the legislation may enhance financial inclusion for Moldova’s substantial diaspora community. Remittance flows constitute approximately 15% of Moldova’s GDP according to World Bank data. The regulatory clarity could stimulate fintech investment and innovation within Moldova’s growing technology sector. However, authorities must balance innovation promotion with systemic risk management. The National Bank of Moldova previously expressed concerns about cryptocurrency volatility and potential financial stability impacts. Expert Perspectives on Regulatory Implementation Financial technology analysts emphasize Moldova’s strategic positioning. Dr. Elena Popa, Chisinau-based fintech researcher, notes: “Moldova’s MiCA alignment demonstrates regulatory sophistication. The approach acknowledges cryptocurrency’s economic reality while establishing necessary safeguards.” This perspective highlights the legislation’s balanced nature. International observers recognize Moldova’s proactive stance within Eastern European cryptocurrency regulation. The legislation development process involves consultations with European regulatory bodies and domestic stakeholders. This collaborative approach enhances regulatory effectiveness and implementation feasibility. Technical Implementation and Compliance Requirements Moldova’s cryptocurrency legislation will establish specific compliance requirements for market participants. The framework likely includes: Licensing regimes for cryptocurrency exchanges and service providers Anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) protocols Consumer protection measures including disclosure requirements Market conduct rules preventing manipulation and abuse Operational resilience standards for service providers These technical elements ensure comprehensive regulatory coverage. The legislation must address both centralized and decentralized finance aspects. Implementation will require coordinated efforts across multiple government agencies and regulatory bodies. Historical Context: Moldova’s Digital Transformation Journey Moldova’s cryptocurrency legislation continues the nation’s digital transformation trajectory. The government launched its Moldova Digital Transformation Strategy 2023-2030 to enhance technological infrastructure and digital services. Previous initiatives include electronic governance platforms and digital identification systems. The National Bank of Moldova explored central bank digital currency (CBDC) possibilities through research partnerships. These developments demonstrate Moldova’s systematic approach to financial technology integration. Cryptocurrency legislation represents the next logical step in this comprehensive digital strategy. Conclusion Moldova’s cryptocurrency legislation development marks a pivotal moment in Eastern European financial regulation. The strategic alignment with EU’s MiCA framework demonstrates regulatory foresight and economic integration commitment. While excluding payment recognition, the legislation provides essential legal clarity for digital asset holding and trading. This balanced approach positions Moldova advantageously within regional cryptocurrency markets while maintaining necessary consumer protections and financial stability safeguards. FAQs Q1: What is Moldova’s main objective with cryptocurrency legislation? Moldova aims to create legal certainty for cryptocurrency holding and trading while aligning with European regulatory standards through the MiCA framework, ensuring consumer protection and market integrity. Q2: Will Moldova recognize Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as legal payment methods? No, Finance Minister Andrian Gavrilita explicitly stated the legislation will not recognize cryptocurrencies as means of payment, maintaining distinction from traditional currency systems. Q3: How does Moldova’s approach differ from neighboring countries? Moldova uniquely aligns with EU’s MiCA framework despite non-membership status, while neighbors like Ukraine developed independent frameworks and Georgia maintains more liberal approaches. Q4: What timeline exists for Moldova’s cryptocurrency legislation implementation? Authorities commit to enacting legislation this year, though specific month remains uncertain, with implementation likely following European MiCA application timelines. Q5: How will cryptocurrency legislation affect Moldova’s economy? The legislation potentially attracts fintech investment, enhances diaspora remittance mechanisms, and stimulates technological innovation while requiring balanced risk management approaches. This post Moldova Crypto Legislation: A Strategic Leap Toward EU’s MiCA Framework Compliance first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

XMR loses $2.1B in market cap – Trouble ahead for Monero?

vor 6 Tagen

Monero retraced from a recent rally as holders and traders rushed into the market and cashed out

Why High-Volume Horse Racing Bettors Prefer Crypto Sportsbooks

vor 6 Tagen

High-volume horse racing bettors operate in a very specific environment. They place frequent wagers, react to late market movement, and work with amounts that quickly expose weaknesses in traditional betting systems. In this context, convenience and bonuses mean very little. This is where crypto horse betting becomes less of an alternative and more of a practical upgrade. Cryptocurrency removes payment friction, shortens execution time, and allows active bettors to focus on markets instead of account mechanics. For those operating at scale, these differences compound fast. Horse racing has always rewarded speed and precision. Crypto simply aligns the betting infrastructure with that reality. What Defines a High-Volume Horse Racing Bettor High-volume bettors are not defined by a single large wager. They are defined by consistency and frequency. Typically, this type of bettor: places multiple bets across race cards works close to post time, where odds are most sensitive adjusts positions quickly based on late information treats execution quality as part of the strategy In horse racing, even small delays can be costly. When a bettor is placing dozens of wagers per session, a few seconds lost on each transaction quickly becomes a structural disadvantage. This is why platform behavior under pressure matters more than surface-level features. Why Traditional Horse Racing Platforms Break Under Volume Most traditional racebooks are not designed for sustained high activity. They perform adequately for casual users but begin to show cracks once betting volume increases. Common friction points include: manual risk reviews triggered by frequent wins delayed bet confirmations near race start sudden limits applied without warning withdrawals slowed by additional verification steps These systems rely heavily on manual controls and centralized oversight. For high-volume bettors, this creates uncertainty at the exact moment when speed and reliability are critical. Over time, these interruptions disrupt workflow and reduce the effectiveness of otherwise sound betting strategies. Dexsport as a Practical Example for High-Volume Horse Racing Dexsport illustrates how crypto-native design benefits high-volume horse racing bettors in real conditions. The platform operates on a non-custodial model, which removes many of the bottlenecks that slow down traditional sportsbooks. Key advantages include: stable bet execution without manual intervention no dependency on custodial balance management uninterrupted access during high-frequency betting sessions This structure aligns closely with the needs of high-volume users, making Dexsport a practical reference point among the best crypto horse racing betting sites. Instead of reacting to betting behavior with restrictions, the platform’s design allows volume to flow naturally. For bettors who prioritize rhythm and reliability, this difference is immediately noticeable. How Crypto Sportsbooks Change Horse Racing Betting Crypto sportsbooks approach betting infrastructure differently. Instead of layering digital payments onto legacy systems, they build execution around automation and direct settlement. This shift matters most in markets where timing and repetition define success. For crypto horse racing betting, the advantages show up immediately: faster bet acceptance close to post time fewer manual checks during active sessions consistent balance updates after each wager Because transactions are handled on-chain and without traditional custody, the system scales more naturally with activity. As betting volume increases, friction does not increase at the same rate — a key difference for serious horse racing bettors. In practice, this means fewer interruptions and a more predictable betting environment, even during peak race hours. Speed and Execution Matter More Than Marginal Odds High-volume bettors understand a simple truth: execution beats headline odds. A slightly better price means very little if: the market freezes before confirmation odds shift after the bet is submitted late wagers are rejected or delayed Horse racing is particularly sensitive to these issues. Odds often move rapidly in the final moments before a race, and that window is where experienced bettors focus their activity. In this context, reliable execution becomes part of the edge. Crypto-based platforms reduce this friction by keeping markets accessible longer and processing bets faster. For active bettors, this consistency often outweighs small differences in theoretical pricing. Risk Management Without Friction One of the least discussed advantages of crypto sportsbooks is how they handle risk — not from the bettor’s side, but from the platform’s. Traditional racebooks rely heavily on manual oversight. When a bettor’s activity increases, it often triggers reviews, delayed settlements, or silent limits. For high-volume players, this creates uncertainty and breaks rhythm. Crypto-based platforms operate differently. Because transactions are transparent, automated, and less dependent on centralized controls, risk management becomes more structural than reactive. Instead of flagging activity after it happens, systems are designed to handle volume from the start. For high-volume horse racing bettors, this means: fewer unexpected interruptions more predictable platform behavior less friction between sessions In a market as fast-moving as horse racing, that consistency becomes a competitive advantage in itself. Conclusion High-volume horse racing betting exposes every weakness in a platform’s infrastructure. Delays, manual checks, and restrictive controls may be tolerable for casual users, but they quickly become obstacles at scale. This is why horse racing crypto betting continues to gain traction among serious bettors. Crypto sportsbooks offer faster execution, smoother scaling, and a betting environment that remains stable even under sustained volume. Dexsport serves as a clear example of how this model works in practice. By removing custodial friction and prioritizing execution, it aligns naturally with the needs of high-volume horse racing bettors. As betting activity grows and markets become more competitive, platforms built around crypto are likely to define the standard rather than follow it.

Jefferies Bitcoin Allocation Removal Sparks Critical Debate on Quantum Computing’s Crypto Threat

vor 6 Tagen

BitcoinWorld Jefferies Bitcoin Allocation Removal Sparks Critical Debate on Quantum Computing’s Crypto Threat NEW YORK, March 2025 – A significant shift in institutional cryptocurrency strategy unfolded this week as investment bank Jefferies removed its recommended 10% Bitcoin allocation from a key model portfolio. This decisive move, reported by Bloomberg, directly stems from growing apprehension about quantum computing’s potential to undermine the foundational security of Bitcoin and similar digital assets. Consequently, the decision highlights a pivotal moment for institutional adoption, forcing a rigorous re-examination of long-term digital store-of-value propositions against emerging technological threats. Jefferies Bitcoin Allocation Removal: A Strategic Reversal Christopher Wood, the Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies, executed the portfolio adjustment. For several years, Wood maintained a bullish stance on Bitcoin within the firm’s Asia ex-Japan relative-return portfolio. He consistently advocated for the cryptocurrency as a hedge against monetary debasement. However, the latest portfolio update marks a stark reversal. The reported rationale centers not on short-term price volatility or regulatory hurdles, but on an existential technological risk. Specifically, Jefferies’ analysis suggests that advances in quantum computing could eventually break the cryptographic algorithms that secure the Bitcoin network. This vulnerability, the firm argues, critically weakens Bitcoin’s core function as a reliable long-term store of value for its institutional client base. This action follows a broader trend of institutional recalibration in early 2025. Major asset managers are increasingly conducting deep due diligence on the technological longevity of their digital asset holdings. The Jefferies decision provides a concrete case study in this evolving risk assessment framework. It moves the conversation beyond market cycles and into the realm of cryptographic integrity. The Quantum Computing Threat to Cryptocurrency Security Quantum computing represents a paradigm shift in processing power. Unlike classical computers using bits, quantum computers use qubits. This allows them to solve certain complex mathematical problems exponentially faster. Crucially, Bitcoin’s security relies on two such cryptographic problems: the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for digital signatures and the SHA-256 hash function. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically break ECDSA. This would allow a malicious actor to forge transactions and steal funds. The SHA-256 function faces a different, though still significant, threat from Grover’s algorithm, which could speed up certain attacks. The timeline for this “cryptographically relevant” quantum computer remains hotly debated. Estimates range from a decade to several decades. Nonetheless, the theoretical risk is now influencing present-day investment decisions at the highest levels. ECDSA Vulnerability: Quantum algorithms like Shor’s algorithm could derive a private key from its corresponding public key, breaking wallet security. Mining Impact: Quantum speedups could also disrupt the mining process and consensus mechanism, though this is considered a secondary concern. Post-Quantum Cryptography: The cryptographic community is actively developing new algorithms designed to be secure against both classical and quantum computers. Transitioning a decentralized network like Bitcoin to such standards, however, presents immense technical and governance challenges. Expert Perspectives on the Institutional Calculus Financial analysts and cryptographers offer nuanced views on Jefferies’ risk assessment. “Portfolio managers have a fiduciary duty to consider long-tail risks,” notes Dr. Anya Petrova, a fintech researcher at the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. “While the quantum threat may be years away, its potential impact is catastrophic. Therefore, some institutions may choose to de-risk preemptively.” Conversely, other experts highlight the proactive work within the crypto ecosystem. “To frame this as an insurmountable problem is misleading,” argues Marcus Tan, lead developer for a Bitcoin scalability protocol. “Several Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs) related to post-quantum signatures are in active discussion. The network has a proven history of adapting to existential challenges.” The table below contrasts the immediate portfolio rationale with the broader technological context: Jefferies’ Portfolio Rationale Cryptographic Community View Quantum computing presents an unmitigated long-term risk to Bitcoin’s value proposition. The threat is recognized, but a multi-year transition pathway exists via soft forks and new signature schemes. The timeline is uncertain, but the risk is too great for a strategic 10% allocation. Focus is on ‘cryptographic agility’—building systems that can easily replace vulnerable algorithms. Institutional clients require absolute security guarantees for a store of value. Security is probabilistic and comparative; the quantum risk must be weighed against risks in traditional systems. Impact on Institutional Cryptocurrency Adoption The Jefferies move sends a powerful signal to other traditional finance institutions. It elevates quantum risk from a technical footnote to a boardroom-level discussion. In the short term, this may cause other risk-averse institutions to pause or scale back direct Bitcoin exposure in their model portfolios. They might instead favor indirect exposure through equities of crypto-related companies or funds with active risk-management strategies. Furthermore, the decision underscores the importance of investment horizons. A pension fund with a 30-year outlook must weigh this risk differently than a hedge fund with a quarterly focus. Simultaneously, the announcement creates a clear market incentive. It pressures blockchain developers and core protocol teams to accelerate research and communicate roadmaps for post-quantum resilience. Projects that can demonstrate a credible, executable transition plan may gain a competitive advantage in attracting institutional capital. This event, therefore, acts as a catalyst for the entire industry to mature its long-term security planning. Conclusion The removal of the Jefferies Bitcoin allocation represents a sophisticated, forward-looking risk management decision. It moves beyond typical market analysis to confront a fundamental technological uncertainty. While the practical timeline for quantum threats remains debated, the action itself has immediate consequences. It forces a crucial dialogue between the financial and cryptographic worlds regarding the future-proofing of digital assets. Ultimately, the long-term health of the cryptocurrency ecosystem will depend on its ability to navigate this challenge, proving its resilience not just to market forces, but to the next generation of computing power. The Jefferies decision is a stark reminder that for institutional adoption to be durable, trust in cryptographic security must be as solid as trust in the asset’s monetary policy. FAQs Q1: What exactly did Jefferies change in its model portfolio? Jefferies’ Global Head of Equity Strategy, Christopher Wood, removed the firm’s longstanding recommendation to allocate 10% of its Asia ex-Japan model portfolio to Bitcoin. This capital was reportedly reallocated to other assets. Q2: How soon could quantum computers break Bitcoin? Most experts estimate that a quantum computer powerful enough to break Bitcoin’s ECDSA encryption is at least 10-15 years away, possibly much longer. It is a long-term, not imminent, threat, but one with severe consequences. Q3: Are other cryptocurrencies vulnerable to quantum computing? Yes, most existing cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, that use similar elliptic curve cryptography are theoretically vulnerable. The risk is not unique to Bitcoin, though its size and store-of-value role make it a primary focus. Q4: Can Bitcoin be upgraded to resist quantum computers? Yes, through a process called a soft fork, the Bitcoin network could integrate post-quantum cryptographic signatures. This requires broad community consensus and is complex but is the subject of active research and proposals. Q5: Should retail investors be worried about this Jefferies decision? The decision reflects a specific, long-term risk assessment for large institutional portfolios. Retail investors with different time horizons and risk tolerances may weigh this factor differently. It highlights the importance of understanding the technological foundations of any crypto investment. This post Jefferies Bitcoin Allocation Removal Sparks Critical Debate on Quantum Computing’s Crypto Threat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Bitcoin Price at $95K Crossroads: Does It Break $94,500 Support or Surge to $100K? – BTC TA January 16, 2026

vor 6 Tagen

The Bitcoin price rose to nearly $98,000 on Tuesday, but since then the price has sunk nearly all the way back down to the $94,500 breakout level. A distribution phase has taken place over the last couple of days. Will Bitcoin now head up to $100,000, or are we going to get some more sideways or downwards price action first? $BTC price consolidates after breakout Source: TradingView While some on social media are already calling for a failed $BTC rally and a descent back into a bear market that is still in its early stages, the short-term chart is possibly suggesting a different directional path. While the $94,500 horizontal support holds, the current breakout is still perfectly valid. Many might have wanted to see the price rocket up to $100,000 as soon as it had broken out, but the situation was that the bulls had expended a lot of effort in the breakout, and there needed to be a decent phase of consolidation in order for upside price momentum to start to build again. Yes, the $BTC price has fallen through the ascending trendline , but this has served to allow the froth to dissipate and the price to regain itself before climbing higher. As can be seen at the bottom of the chart, the 4-hour Stochastic RSI has now reset. The 8-hour and 12-hour have started their descents. By the weekend the price could once more have a good head of steam behind it. RSI breakout by end of January? Source: TradingView The daily chart shows what could be the first consolidation phase on the way to $100,000. This time though the key to price is in the Relative Strength Index at the foot of the chart. It can be observed that the indicator line appears to be rejecting from a 14-month trendline that stretches all the way back to November 2024. It also has to be borne in mind that bearish divergence has built up as this trend has descended, while the price action has risen. With the relatively recent rally to the upside, it can be noted that an uptrend line is forcing the indicator into a tightening space against the descending trendline, where the indicator will go one way or the other, possibly before the end of January. If it’s to the upside, it could cause an explosion in the $BTC price action, but if it’s to the downside, it could spell the end of this rally. Another week needed to confirm breakout on high time frame Source: TradingView The weekly time frame for $BTC is painting a bullish picture. Yes, there are all sorts of indicators that might suggest that this is no more than a bear market rally, but it’s usually best to keep things simple. The price is breaking out of an ascending triangle (a bullish pattern) and should it remain above by the end of the week, the following weekly candle can confirm the breakout on this high time frame. At the bottom of the chart, the Stochastic RSI indicators are signalling strong upside price momentum . As long as they both stay above the 20.00 line by the end of the week, this momentum should begin to make itself felt in the price. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.