Republicans called a digital asset market structure bill a bipartisan effort despite pushback from some Democrats on certain provisions.
Pakistan has signed a memorandum of understanding with a firm linked to World Liberty Financial (WLF) to explore the use of its USD1 stablecoin. The agreement represents one of the first publicly announced collaborations involving WLF, and it comes as ties between Pakistan and the United States show signs of warming. Details From the Agreement According to a Reuters report, the Pakistan Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority signed the agreement with SC Financial Technologies, an entity affiliated with WLF. The regulator explained that the memorandum is meant to support dialogue and technical understanding around emerging digital payment architectures. Under the agreement, SC Financial Technologies will work with Pakistan’s central bank to explore integrating the USD1 stablecoin into a regulated digital payments structure, according to a source involved in the deal. This would allow the token to function alongside the country’s digital currency infrastructure. Zach Witkoff, the chief executive of WLF and SC Financial Technologies, made the announcement during a visit to Pakistan. While there, he met with senior local stakeholders to discuss digital payment systems, cross-border settlement, and foreign exchange processes. SC Financial Technologies is registered in Delaware and co-owns the USD1 stablecoin brand with U.S. President Donald Trump’s family’s crypto business, based on documentation related to the stablecoin’s reserves from July 2025. Commenting on the agreement, Pakistan’s Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said, “Our focus is to stay ahead of the curve by engaging with credible global players, understanding new financial models, and ensuring that innovation, where explored, is aligned with regulation, stability, and national interest.” Pakistan’s Digital Strategy Stablecoins have experienced rapid growth in the last year, partially due to the United States passing the GENIUS Act, a federal law that set clear rules for dollar-backed digital assets. The regulatory clarity has encouraged other countries to assess how they could be used within their own financial systems. USD1 launched on Ethereum and Binance’s BNB Chain in March 2025, and went live on DWF Labs’ market maker platform just over two months later. World Liberty recently proposed using up to 5% of its unlocked native WLFI tokens, valued at around $120 million at the time, to boost the asset’s growth. This came after the stablecoin flexed its growing stature in the global financial space when the state-controlled Abu Dhabi Investment company MGX used it to acquire a $2 billion stake in Binance. Meanwhile, Pakistan has also been advancing its own digital currency efforts as it seeks to reduce cash usage and improve cross-border payments such as remittances, which are a key source of foreign exchange. In July last year, the central bank governor said the nation was preparing to launch a CBDC pilot and was finalizing legislation to regulate virtual assets. The post Pakistan Partners With World Liberty Financial to Pilot USD1 Stablecoin for Cross-Border Payments appeared first on CryptoPotato .
Eric Adams said he did not profit from the launch of the NYC Token memcoin he is promoting, which initially soared in value before crashing following its debut on Monday, prompting crypto market observers to draw parallels to a “rug pull.”
The Sui blockchain recovered from a nearly six-hour outage Wednesday, marking the network's second major downtime since its 2023 launch.
Bitcoin’s latest recovery above $94,000 raises up the question of whether it is the next leg for the continuation of a bull cycle or the final rally before a deeper reset. However, an interesting technical outlook shared on TradingView by crypto analyst Xanrox suggests the bullish path many traders are watching could ultimately end lower than expected, even if price strength is strong in the near term. Elliott Wave Setup Leaves Room For One More Push Higher Technical analysis of Bitcoin’s price action on the weekly candlestick timeframe chart shows the cryptocurrency has completed a five-impulse wave that goes as far back as early 2023. This impulse wave count ended with Bitcoin’s peak above $126,000 in October 2025 and the cryptocurrency is now playing out corrective waves ABC. Related Reading: Next XRP Wave Shows Where Price Is Headed Next, But There’s A Catch Based on the Elliott Wave theory, Xanrox noted that Bitcoin may already have completed a sharp decline from a projected 2025 peak near $125,000 down to the low-$80,000 range, labeling that move as a corrective wave A. The price action is now viewed as being in a bullish counter-trend phase, commonly referred to as wave (B) or (X), which is known to retrace a portion of the prior decline before rolling over. In this scenario, Bitcoin could still advance to as high as the $100,000 to $103,000 range over the coming weeks or months and even encourage a brief rotation into altcoins during the advance. That upside, however, is corrective and not impulsive, and the next move is a larger move lower once the structure is complete. Bitcoin Weekly Candlestick. Source: TradingView Long-Term Structure Points To A Painful Reset Window Xanrox’s analysis places Bitcoin within a long-term linear structure stretching from 2017 into 2026, highlighting how previous market cycles ended with deep corrections after euphoric peaks. The analysis uses the 2018 and 2022 drawdowns, which erased more than three-quarters of Bitcoin’s value each time, as anchors for what could unfold next for the leading cryptocurrency. Related Reading: Get Ready For An XRP Price Explosion Once This Happens; Analyst According to this framework, the next major corrective phase is projected to play out in 2026, when Bitcoin could fall into the sub-$60,000 region, with $57,000 as the most important area of interest where the correction might end. The $57,000 price correction target is based on the location of the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement when projected from the recent 2025 peak and is going to be just above the 200-week moving average. The projected move would still represent a correction of roughly 54% from the 2025 high if this actually turns out to be the cycle peak. However, it is important to note that the presence of Spot Bitcoin ETFs introduces a stabilizing force compared to earlier cycles in 2018 and 2022, and so any high correction might find a strong support level before falling as low as $57,000. Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com
Here's why $95k price could still be cheap for BTC
In the crypto markets, the big cryptos can provide consistent value and rarely provide explosive value gains off of current levels because of their size. In this case, some investors switch attention to smaller assets when they are close to major protocol milestones in hopes of gaining bigger growth potential before utility becomes visible. This cheap crypto with a current price of around $0.04 is being mentioned due to a potential 800% appreciation as it nears some of the most tracked protocol launches ever. Solana (SOL) Solana (SOL) is trading at approximately the $140 mark at a market capitalization of over 78billion current making it among the largest cryptocurrencies. This valuation indicates a high level of network activity and widespread implementation in the smart contract applications and decentralized systems. Analysts appreciate SOL because of its throughput, low charges and broad application in the decentralized projects. Nonetheless, current market action indicates that it has become resistant around the $150 area, where the market has developed stagnation in several consecutive sessions. The price charts have shown that SOL has failed to maintain a breakthrough beyond this scale and it is possible that the buyers are reluctant to act without a new trigger. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is one of those tracked new altcoins that is in presale. The sale began at a low price of $0.01 early in 2025 and it has since gone through a number of pricing stages. During Phase 7 MUTM is valued at approximately $0.04. The actual launch price is confirmed at $0.06 that the early backers can use to get a clear reference point when the liquidity becomes publicly available to support its valuation. The protocol is now developed to establish ordered lending and borrowing markets in which users may provide liquidity and acquire yield or borrow by placing collateral through regulated rules. Security is one of the priorities: Mutuum Finance underwent a full audit of its smart contract by Halborn Security and achieved a 90/100 Token Scan rating on CertiK and a $50,000 bug bounty program to minimize the risk before it goes live. Structural Differences and Upside Potential The primary distinction between Solana and Mutuum Finance is the stage of each asset. Solana is already a huge capital network that has significant liquidity. Moving large assets require heavy inflows to move and, as such, it makes fast multiples more challenging. Mutuum Finance is in a new crypto stage. MUTM is a nascent product and the price is based on progress of development and not on complete use. Since it is at the last stage of its pricing before introduction, token has an additional space to move after borrowing, lending, and mtToken policies generate quantifiable activity. As an example of the variance, a stock holding of $500 in SOL at present can give small rewards in case the resistance is taken off and the general situation is positive. The same $500 dollars invested in MUTM at $0.04 would obtain approximately 12,500 tokens. A number of analysts that simulate early-stage lending tokens envisage possible events that result in MUTM falling within a $0.18 to $0.24 band within the initial major usage period as long as borrowing demand and mtToken yields progress as planned. This would have approximately a 4.5x -6x upside versus the 10x -20x estimates found in hypothetical stories. Protocol Launch and Phase 7 Importance The second significant trigger to Mutuum Finance is V1 protocol release, which will enable live lending and borrowing markets, including collateral controls, interest logic, and liquidation logic. This shift between development and usage usually narrows the expectation gap and causes revaluation as the metrics of usage and revenue flows begin to emerge. The fact that Phase 7 is immediately lower than the set price of the confirmed launch at $0.06 is vital to the participants. With the approach of the presale closing and the approach of the protocol being activated, allocation at lower pricing becomes narrower. A closing out stage (phase) can be an indicator of momentum and can create the liquidity period post-launch setting. That is why analysts who talk about structural token pricing have an 800% upside scenario on MUTM at current levels where usage rises, liquidity gets consumed upon launching and demand based on revenue reinforces. This is a model using adoption curves like successful lending protocols of the early days. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://www.mutuum.com Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance
BitcoinWorld Sui Network Triumphantly Restored After Critical Latency Issues: A Deep Dive into Blockchain Resilience On March 15, 2025, the Sui blockchain network successfully restored normal operations following significant latency issues that affected its mainnet for approximately five hours. This swift resolution demonstrates the evolving resilience of modern Layer-1 blockchain infrastructures. Network administrators announced the restoration via official channels, advising users to refresh applications for seamless functionality. Consequently, this incident provides valuable insights into decentralized system maintenance and user communication protocols. Sui Network Latency Incident: Technical Analysis and Resolution The Sui network experienced measurable latency across its mainnet infrastructure beginning in the early UTC hours. Network validators initially detected transaction processing delays and increased confirmation times. The development team promptly identified the root cause through coordinated monitoring systems. They implemented a targeted solution that optimized network consensus mechanisms and data propagation pathways. This technical intervention restored normal block production rates and transaction finality within the projected timeframe. Blockchain networks occasionally face performance challenges during peak usage periods or protocol updates. The Sui Foundation’s transparent communication during this event followed established industry best practices. They provided regular updates through official X accounts and developer channels. Network participants received clear instructions regarding potential temporary service impacts. This approach minimized user confusion and maintained trust throughout the resolution process. Blockchain Network Stability in 2025: Comparative Context Network stability remains a critical metric for evaluating blockchain performance and reliability. The Sui incident occurred amidst growing adoption of Move-based smart contract platforms. Other major networks have faced similar challenges during their growth phases. For instance, Ethereum experienced congestion issues before implementing scaling solutions. Solana encountered multiple network halts between 2021 and 2023 before achieving greater stability. Recent Blockchain Network Performance Incidents (2023-2025) Network Incident Type Duration Primary Cause Sui Latency Issues ~5 hours Consensus optimization Aptos Performance degradation 2 hours Validator configuration Solana Partial outage 7 hours Resource exhaustion Avalanche Delayed finality 3 hours Network upgrade Modern blockchain architectures incorporate sophisticated fault detection and recovery mechanisms. The Sui network’s parallel transaction processing capabilities typically provide superior throughput compared to sequential blockchains. However, all distributed systems require occasional maintenance and optimization. Network operators continuously monitor key performance indicators including: Transaction per second (TPS) rates Block propagation times Validator participation percentages Memory pool congestion levels Expert Perspectives on Blockchain Incident Response Industry analysts emphasize the importance of transparent incident reporting and rapid resolution. Dr. Elena Rodriguez, a distributed systems researcher at Stanford University, notes: “Network incidents provide valuable stress tests for blockchain architectures. The response methodology often reveals more about a project’s maturity than the incident itself. Teams that communicate clearly and resolve issues systematically demonstrate stronger long-term viability.” Blockchain security auditors similarly highlight the significance of post-incident analysis. Comprehensive reviews typically examine validator coordination, client software implementations, and network monitoring tools. These analyses contribute to improved protocols and preventive measures. The Sui development team has committed to publishing a technical post-mortem, continuing a trend toward greater transparency in the blockchain ecosystem. Impact on SUI Cryptocurrency and Ecosystem Participants The latency incident generated measurable effects across the Sui ecosystem during the five-hour period. Decentralized applications experienced varying degrees of performance impact depending on their transaction requirements. However, most user-facing services maintained basic functionality through the implementation of graceful degradation protocols. Market data indicates minimal price volatility for the SUI token during the incident window, suggesting mature market responses to temporary technical issues. Network validators played a crucial role in maintaining stability throughout the resolution process. Their coordinated efforts ensured consistent block production despite the latency challenges. Validator operators reported implementing contingency plans developed during previous network stress tests. This preparedness reflects the growing professionalization of blockchain infrastructure operations. Ecosystem participants generally expressed satisfaction with the communication timeline and restoration speed. Technical Infrastructure and Future Prevention Measures The Sui network’s architecture employs several innovative features designed to enhance performance and reliability. Its parallel execution engine typically processes transactions across multiple logical partitions simultaneously. The object-centric data model differs substantially from account-based systems used by earlier blockchains. These technical choices influence both performance characteristics and potential failure modes during unusual network conditions. Development teams typically implement multiple preventive measures following network incidents. Common enhancements include: Improved monitoring and alerting systems Additional validator redundancy requirements Enhanced client software error handling More comprehensive stress testing protocols Updated documentation for node operators The blockchain industry has developed increasingly sophisticated tools for network health assessment. Real-time dashboards now provide granular visibility into transaction flows, validator performance, and resource utilization. These monitoring capabilities enable faster incident detection and more targeted responses. The Sui ecosystem benefits from these industry-wide advancements in operational tooling and best practices. Conclusion The Sui network restoration demonstrates significant progress in blockchain operational resilience. The five-hour latency incident concluded with minimal ecosystem disruption through coordinated technical response. This event highlights the maturing infrastructure supporting next-generation blockchain platforms. Network stability remains paramount for user trust and ecosystem growth. The Sui development team’s transparent handling of this challenge reinforces confidence in their technical capabilities and commitment to network reliability. As blockchain technology evolves, incident response protocols continue to improve across the industry. FAQs Q1: What caused the Sui network latency issues? The exact technical cause remains under analysis, but initial reports indicate optimization requirements in consensus mechanisms during specific network conditions. The development team has committed to publishing a detailed technical post-mortem. Q2: How did the latency affect SUI token transactions? Transactions experienced delayed processing and confirmation during the incident, but the network maintained basic functionality. Most wallet providers implemented user notifications about potential delays. Q3: What should users do if they continue experiencing issues? The Sui team recommends refreshing applications or browser interfaces. Persistent problems may require clearing local caches or updating to the latest wallet software versions. Q4: How does this incident compare to other blockchain outages? The five-hour resolution timeframe compares favorably to historical blockchain incidents. The transparent communication approach followed current industry best practices for incident management. Q5: What measures prevent future latency issues on Sui? The development team typically enhances monitoring systems, implements additional stress testing, and refines validator coordination protocols following such incidents to improve network resilience. This post Sui Network Triumphantly Restored After Critical Latency Issues: A Deep Dive into Blockchain Resilience first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Jensen Huang’s Nvidia (the most valuable company on earth) has been getting slapped around on Wall Street for weeks, and it’s starting to get weird. The NVDA stock is down 2.6% in 2026 so far, and even though it’s still up 38% over the last year, it’s clearly lost its grip compared to the rest of the AI gang. And that’s with constant announcements and new gear flooding out of the pipeline. Earlier in the year, Cryptopolitan reported that Nvidia rolled out its Vera Rubin platform at CES, made a big noise about demand staying strong, and has continued pitching new AI products like it’s on a mission. Q4 earnings season has officially kicked in, as you likely know, and Nvidia Day is coming on the 26th of February. Investors are blaming weak AI sentiment for stock crash, not Nvidia itself Freedom Capital Markets’ veteran tech analyst Paul Meeks says he still backs Nvidia hard and sees it going to $250 per share in the next two years. For anyone not holding the stock, he says it’s time to start buying. Meeks also said that a major boost could come from Nvidia signing deals outside tech, like with General Motors or Johnson & Johnson, and also AI capex plans for 2026 from the cloud giants. Chris Caso, an analyst at Wolfe Research, also still sees Nvidia as a leader, calling it his “favorite AI idea”. He pointed to the aforementioned Vera Rubin platform’s leap over the older Blackwell chips, saying the tech improvements let Nvidia keep pricing power and protect profit margins. But Caso says the recent slump came from three main things: the late launch of Blackwell, fears about how long AI spending will last, and Nvidia possibly losing ground to custom AI chips built in-house by big players. Rotation away from growth stocks added pressure on Nvidia’s stock Hank Smith, head of strategy at Haverford Trust, says Nvidia’s weakness doesn’t mean any other company can overtake it, at least not anytime soon anyway. The analyst is waiting for the stock to crash around $150 to $160, where he expects tons of investors (both retail and institutional) to “rapidly buy the dip.” Smith added that Nvidia is currently trading around 25–27 times forward earnings, which he says means it’s no longer in “nosebleed territory.” But not everyone’s been scared off. On Wednesday, NVDA fell another 2%, but analysts doubled down on their bullish takes. Tristan Gerra at Baird called Nvidia one of his top ideas for 2026, citing its low multiple compared to other AI names and its dominant spot in AI data centers. He set a $275 price target, saying Nvidia has no serious competition in the medium term. Gerra also rejected the view that Nvidia’s market share will fall once inferencing becomes more popular. “Hyperscalers own their custom chip designs,” he wrote, “but Nvidia owns all of its own IP.” That, to him, is a huge edge. Stacy Rasgon at Bernstein also called Nvidia a top pick this week. He pointed to steady AI spending and a stock price that’s now far more reasonable than it was during the hype surge. Rasgon said the valuation is “extremely attractive” given Nvidia’s scale and tech pipeline. Data from TradingView shows Sundar Pichai’s Alphabet has surged by 77% YTD, Lisa Su’s AMD has exploded 91%, and even Hocky Tan’s Broadcom is sitting on a 51% gain, all outperforming Nvidia. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
Bitcoin finds renewed strength as inflows to the spot BTC ETFs resume, but data questions whether bulls can push the price to $105,000.