Bitcoin Conference Announces Code & Country 2026: Policy Forum Returns for Election Year

  vor 2 Monaten

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Conference Announces Code & Country 2026: Policy Forum Returns for Election Year Nashville, TN — February 10, 2026 — The Bitcoin Conference announced today Code & Country 2026, the flagship policy forum returning for its second year to convene industry leaders, builders and U.S. policymakers for direct discussions on the issues shaping technology, regulation, and legislative priorities. Code & Country 2026 will take place on April 27 at 12:00 PM and will be open to Pro Pass and Whale Pass holders. The forum is scheduled during the 2026 U.S. election year, when congressional agendas, committee priorities, and policy frameworks are actively taking shape. The event is designed to facilitate direct engagement between those building critical infrastructure and those shaping policy – no intermediaries. Discussions will focus on active legislation, administrative priorities, and the real-world implications of regulatory decisions on the industries defining America’s technological future. “Policy decisions affecting Bitcoin are made regardless of industry participation. We finally have an administration and bipartisan Congress seeking guidance from our industry on how to regulate. We can either jump in the game and help craft the next century of the regulatory landscape, or watch from the sidelines as someone else does it for us,” said Brandon Green, CEO of BTC Inc. This year’s programming addresses the convergence of Bitcoin with broader policy areas – from energy infrastructure and stablecoin regulation to civil liberties in a digital age. Policymakers and congressional staff will hear directly from industry participants operating at scale, while attendees will gain insight into how policy development functions in Washington. The Code & Country program builds on policy-focused programming introduced at the Bitcoin Conference in 2024 with President Donald Trump’s speech and formally launched as a branded track in 2025. Featured past participation from senior U.S. political leaders, regulators, and policymakers includes Vice President J.D. Vance, White House AI & Crypto Czar David Sacks, Bo Hines, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, and Senator Cynthia Lummis, reflecting increased engagement between the Bitcoin industry and U.S. policymakers on regulatory and technology issues. Code & Country 2026 is intended for: Industry leaders and builders seeking direct engagement with policymakers on regulatory frameworks Leaders in AI, energy, and adjacent sectors navigating the policy landscape Participants newer to policy discussions looking to understand how legislative decisions affect Bitcoin Policymakers and staff seeking technical and operational perspectives from those building at scale Further details regarding speakers and programming will be announced ahead of the event. For more information visit: https://2026.b.tc/code-country About The Bitcoin ConferenceThe Bitcoin Conference, organised by BTC Media, the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine, is a global event series, featuring notable industry speakers, workshops, exhibitions, and entertainment. These events serve as vital platforms for Bitcoin industry leaders, developers, investors, and enthusiasts to gather, network, and exchange ideas. Bitcoin 2026 is being held in Las Vegas in April 2026. Its international events include Bitcoin Hong Kong(August 27-28, 2026), Bitcoin Amsterdam (November 5-6, 2026) and Bitcoin MENA (Abu Dhabi, December 2026). This post Bitcoin Conference Announces Code & Country 2026: Policy Forum Returns for Election Year first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Weiterlesen

Kalshi Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Khamenei Prediction Market Payout

  vor 2 Monaten

Prediction markets platform Kalshi is facing a class action lawsuit over the resolution of a market tied to the leadership of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Key Takeaways: Kalshi is facing a class action lawsuit over how it resolved a prediction market on Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Plaintiffs claim the platform denied full payouts by applying a “death carveout” rule after Khamenei’s reported death. Kalshi says the rule was designed to prevent traders from profiting directly from a person’s death. The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, accuses the company of misleading traders in a market titled “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” Plaintiffs claim the platform created expectations that contracts predicting Khamenei’s removal by March 1 would pay out at full value if the outcome occurred. Kalshi Traders Dispute Payout After ‘Death Carveout’ Rule Applied According to the complaint, Khamenei’s death was reported by multiple media outlets on Feb. 28. Traders holding contracts predicting he would be out of office by the following day expected their “yes” shares to resolve at $1 each, the standard payout for a correct prediction on the platform. Instead, Kalshi applied a rule known as a “death carveout provision.” The clause states that if the leader leaves office solely due to death, the market outcome will resolve based on the final traded price rather than paying out the full value of winning contracts. The plaintiffs argue that this decision deprived traders of the payouts they believed they had earned. “Plaintiffs and the proposed class members, who correctly predicted the outcome, did not receive the amounts they were promised,” the lawsuit states. The complaint alleges that traders were paid amounts that were “arbitrary” and significantly below the expected contract value. Two named plaintiffs reportedly held roughly $259.84 worth of positions in the market. Overall trading activity in the event exceeded $54 million in volume. The legal filing further argues that the rule used to determine the payout was not sufficiently disclosed to users when they entered their trades. According to the plaintiffs, the death-related clause appeared only in technical market rules that many traders may not have noticed before placing bets. Public criticism intensified on social media following the market’s resolution. In response, Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour addressed the issue in a post on X, explaining that the platform avoids markets that allow traders to profit directly from a person’s death. “We don’t list markets directly tied to death,” Mansour wrote. “When potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death.” We stand by principle and law: 1. Kalshi didn't deviate from its market rules. They were clear that death did not resolve the market to "Yes". 2. Kalshi's rules prevented a 'death market', where traders directly profit from death. This is a good thing (+ we're a US based… https://t.co/gXMeQECFLz — Tarek Mansour (@mansourtarek_) March 6, 2026 He acknowledged that the company could improve how rules are displayed on market pages. Mansour said the situation highlighted the need for clearer user experience design to ensure traders better understand contract conditions before participating. Kalshi Says Traders Didn’t Lose Money After Market Dispute Kalshi also reimbursed all trading fees and net losses associated with the market. According to the company, no traders ultimately lost money as a result of the resolution. Despite the refunds, the plaintiffs are seeking compensatory damages representing the full value of the expected payouts, along with punitive damages intended to deter similar conduct in the future. Mansour said the company followed its established rules and emphasized that Kalshi did not generate profit from the market. The lawsuit arrives as prediction markets gain wider attention. Kalshi recently secured funding at an $11 billion valuation , reflecting the rapid growth of the sector and rising trading activity across event-based markets. The post Kalshi Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Khamenei Prediction Market Payout appeared first on Cryptonews .

Weiterlesen

South Korea’s Bold Move: Financial Authorities to Bar Listed Firms from Stablecoin Investments

  vor 2 Monaten

BitcoinWorld South Korea’s Bold Move: Financial Authorities to Bar Listed Firms from Stablecoin Investments SEOUL, South Korea – In a significant development for digital asset regulation, South Korean financial authorities are drafting guidelines that will likely prohibit publicly listed companies from investing in stablecoins. This policy, first reported by The Herald Business, aims to curb corporate exposure to dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) during the market’s formative stages. Consequently, this move signals a cautious, protective approach by regulators overseeing one of the world’s most active cryptocurrency economies. South Korea’s Stablecoin Ban for Corporate Investors Financial authorities in South Korea are preparing explicit corporate investment guidelines. These guidelines will notably exclude stablecoins from the list of permissible assets for listed firms. The primary objective is to prevent what regulators term “reckless investment” during the early, volatile phases of the stablecoin market. This decision directly impacts how domestic corporations can engage with major global stablecoins, which are essential for trading and liquidity across crypto exchanges. However, the reported guidelines create a distinct separation between corporate and personal investment. While companies face restrictions, individuals retain the ability to buy and sell stablecoins. They can use personal wallets or access overseas exchanges, including platforms like Coinbase’s over-the-counter (OTC) service. This distinction underscores a regulatory philosophy focused on systemic risk management rather than a blanket prohibition on the asset class. The Regulatory Context Behind the Decision South Korea’s financial ecosystem has maintained a notoriously strict stance on cryptocurrency. The government implemented the Travel Rule in 2022, requiring exchanges to collect and share sender and receiver data for transactions over 1 million KRW (approximately $750). Furthermore, the Virtual Asset User Protection Act came into effect in July 2024, establishing a comprehensive legal framework for investor protection and market oversight. The proposed stablecoin restriction aligns with this existing regulatory trajectory. It acts as a preemptive measure ahead of broader global stablecoin regulations currently under discussion by bodies like the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). South Korean authorities are particularly wary of the potential for stablecoin de-pegging events, like the temporary collapse of TerraUSD (UST) in 2022, to trigger contagion within the traditional corporate sector. Expert Analysis on Market Protection Financial policy analysts interpret this move as a classic macroprudential tool. “By walling off listed companies—which have fiduciary duties to shareholders and can impact broader market stability—from stablecoin speculation, regulators are insulating the traditional economy from crypto-specific volatility,” explains a Seoul-based fintech policy researcher. This approach mirrors historical measures where regulators limited corporate investment in other nascent or high-risk asset classes until markets matured and safeguards were established. The table below outlines the key differences in permitted access under the expected guidelines: Entity Type Access to Stablecoins (e.g., USDT, USDC) Permitted Channels Listed Corporations Barred for investment Not applicable Individual Investors Permitted Personal wallets, overseas exchanges (e.g., Coinbase OTC) Financial Institutions (Banks) Subject to separate, stricter capital and licensing rules Highly restricted, case-by-case approval Immediate and Long-Term Market Impacts The immediate impact of this policy is likely to be symbolic and directional rather than causing massive sell-offs. Most large, listed South Korean firms have not made significant direct investments in stablecoins, partly due to existing regulatory uncertainty. The larger effect is setting a clear boundary for corporate treasury strategies. Companies exploring crypto will now need to focus on other digital assets or entirely different blockchain-based services, potentially slowing institutional adoption within the country. In the long term, this policy could influence other jurisdictions considering similar rules. It also places pressure on South Korean exchanges and fintech companies to develop compliant, regulated stablecoin alternatives that might eventually meet corporate investment criteria. The Bank of Korea’s ongoing central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot project may also receive increased attention as a potential future cornerstone for institutional digital settlement. Global Stablecoin Regulation Landscape South Korea’s action occurs within a complex global regulatory mosaic. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, fully applicable from mid-2025, establishes a rigorous licensing regime for “asset-referenced tokens” (stablecoins). In the United States, the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act remains pending, creating a patchwork of state-level regulations. Meanwhile, Japan has approved the issuance of stablecoins under strict banking laws. South Korea’s corporate-focused ban represents a distinct, conservative entry in this global playbook, prioritizing traditional financial stability above early innovation adoption by institutions. Conclusion South Korea’s move to bar listed firms from stablecoin investment is a deliberate regulatory step. It aims to protect corporate balance sheets and the broader financial system from the unique risks of an emerging asset class. While it restricts one channel of institutional capital, it explicitly preserves access for retail investors, reflecting a nuanced approach to risk management. This development underscores South Korea’s continued role as a cautious yet influential regulator in the global cryptocurrency landscape, setting precedents that other nations may observe as they draft their own stablecoin policies. FAQs Q1: What exactly are South Korean regulators proposing? South Korean financial authorities are drafting new corporate investment guidelines that will exclude stablecoins like USDT and USDC from the list of assets in which publicly listed companies can invest. Q2: Can individual investors in South Korea still buy stablecoins? Yes. The reported guidelines only restrict corporate investment. Individuals can continue to buy, sell, and hold stablecoins using personal cryptocurrency wallets or through overseas exchanges. Q3: Why is South Korea taking this action? Regulators state the goal is to prevent “reckless investment” by corporations in the early stages of the stablecoin market, aiming to shield the traditional economy from potential crypto-market volatility and de-peg risks. Q4: Does this mean stablecoins are banned in South Korea? No. This is not a blanket ban. It is a specific restriction on one type of investor (listed corporations). Trading and use of stablecoins on exchanges for individuals and other entities continues under existing regulations. Q5: How does this compare to stablecoin regulation in other countries? South Korea’s approach is more restrictive for corporations than the EU’s MiCA framework, which licenses stablecoin issuers, and the current U.S. state-by-state model. It is a proactive, preventative measure focused specifically on institutional exposure. This post South Korea’s Bold Move: Financial Authorities to Bar Listed Firms from Stablecoin Investments first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Weiterlesen

What 2,000 XRP Could be Worth by December 2026

  vor 2 Monaten

Crypto commentator Steph recently examined how much 2,000 XRP could be worth by the end of 2026 under different market scenarios. His projections rely on assumptions about the broader crypto market and potential growth in XRP’s share of total market cap. Visit Website

Weiterlesen

Pundit Describes How $10,000 In XRP Could Become $1,000,000

  vor 2 Monaten

Interest in the long-term potential of XRP continues to center on a common investor question: what level of growth would be required for a modest position to reach seven-figure value? A recent analysis shared on X explored a scenario in which a $10,000 investment could theoretically grow to $1 million depending on future price levels and market capitalization. The explanation focused on the numerical thresholds involved and the scale of global financial activity that supporters believe could influence long-term demand for XRP. In presenting the figures, crypto enthusiast X Finance Bull emphasized that the post was not intended as a prediction but as a breakdown of the calculations and infrastructure developments often cited in discussions about the asset’s future valuation. People ask if $10K in $XRP can become $1M At ~$1.33, $10K gets you about 7,520 XRP. XRP at $16 = ~$1T market cap. Your position is worth ~$120K. Requires sustained ETF inflows and real institutional settlement volume. XRP at $133 = ~$8T market cap. Your 7,520 XRP hits… pic.twitter.com/valOAffuTY — X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) March 5, 2026 Calculating the Path From $10,000 to $1 Million According to X Finance Bull, an investment of $10,000 in XRP at approximately $1.33 would purchase about 7,520 XRP. From that starting point, he calculated how different price levels would impact the value of that holding. He stated that if XRP were to reach $16 per coin, the implied market capitalization would approach roughly $1 trillion. At that level, the initial $10,000 investment would be worth about $120,000. He explained that reaching such a valuation would likely require sustained inflows from exchange-traded funds, including significant institutional settlement activity using the asset. The post then outlined the level required for a $1 million portfolio outcome. If XRP were to reach $133 per coin, the 7,520 XRP position would be valued at approximately $1 million. However, X Finance Bull noted that this price would imply a total market capitalization near $8 trillion. Rather than presenting this outcome as a forecast, he emphasized that the figures illustrate how price, supply, and valuation interact. Global Payment Infrastructure and Institutional Activity X Finance Bull also mentioned several developments that he believes illustrate the scale of financial activity linked to the XRP ecosystem. He pointed to the global foreign exchange market, which processes an estimated $7.5 trillion in transactions per day, as well as cross-border payment flows that exceed $150 trillion annually. These figures were presented as examples of the large financial markets that blockchain-based settlement systems aim to address. The commentator also mentioned several institutional elements tied to the ecosystem, including the planned Ripple National Trust Bank and the launch of the stablecoin RLUSD . He further cited exchange-traded funds (ETFs)that have reportedly attracted around $1.25 billion. He also referenced the clearing activity involving Hidden Road through the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation that he said exceeds $3 trillion. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Community Reactions to the Valuation Discussion Several users responded to the post with their own perspectives on XRP’s potential valuation. A commenter identified as Crypto_Luke argued that traditional market capitalization metrics may not fully capture the value of a network designed to facilitate global liquidity. He wrote that once XRP is viewed as a liquidity layer moving money worldwide, investors begin to question whether conventional market-cap comparisons are the right framework for evaluating it. Another user, ChainVision, offered a more aggressive outlook. He stated that when factors such as transaction velocity, total supply, and institutional adoption are considered, XRP could eventually reach a value above $1,000 per coin . X Finance Bull concluded his post by reiterating that he was presenting numerical possibilities rather than making predictions. He encouraged readers to review the calculations and infrastructure factors themselves before deciding how they view the asset’s long-term potential. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Pundit Describes How $10,000 In XRP Could Become $1,000,000 appeared first on Times Tabloid .

Weiterlesen

The Hormuz Standoff: Why Bitcoin’s Liquidity Drain Is Defying The Global Energy Shock

  vor 2 Monaten

Bitcoin is attempting to hold the $70,000 level as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East intensify, injecting fresh uncertainty into global financial markets. The asset began the week trading above $74,000 but experienced a sharp repricing as investors reacted to escalating developments around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global energy supply. As the conflict appeared likely to persist, markets quickly adjusted expectations, triggering volatility across risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. According to a recent CryptoQuant report, energy-related geopolitical shocks can act as a transmission channel for broader macroeconomic disruptions. Escalations that threaten global oil supply often reinforce inflationary pressures and increase capital costs across the financial system. These dynamics force investors to reassess monetary policy expectations, particularly regarding the trajectory of interest rates and liquidity conditions. On Thursday, March 5, the Hormuz-related escalation triggered a sudden repricing across markets. Bitcoin, which had been trading comfortably above the $74,000 level earlier in the week, dropped sharply as the market digested the implications of a potentially prolonged conflict and its impact on the global macro environment. Despite the volatility, Bitcoin’s internal market structure appears to be showing a degree of resilience. While macro risks are being priced across global markets and influencing Federal Reserve expectations, on-chain flows suggest that underlying demand remains active, indicating that market participants are approaching the current environment with increasingly selective capital allocation strategies. Energy Shock Triggers ETF Outflows While On-Chain Data Shows Resilience The report further explains that the geopolitical escalation surrounding global energy supply has triggered immediate reactions across both traditional and crypto markets. Several macro indicators illustrate the scale of the shock. Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net outflow of approximately $139.2 million on March 5, reflecting a rapid shift toward risk aversion among institutional investors. At the same time, energy markets reacted strongly: Brent crude climbed to $85.41 while WTI reached $81.01, signaling that traders are pricing in potential logistical disruptions. The ripple effects extend beyond energy markets. US gasoline prices rose by roughly $0.27 per gallon during the week, demonstrating how quickly supply shocks pass through to consumers. Meanwhile, fertilizer prices have also begun to climb, creating a dual cost shock that threatens to pressure global food supply chains. Despite this macro-driven liquidity drain, Bitcoin’s on-chain structure shows signs of resilience. The report highlights the Bitcoin Exchange Netflow (Total) metric as a key indicator of market liquidity. When adjusted using a 7-day moving average to filter daily noise, exchange flows remain clearly negative even amid global risk-off sentiment. Recent daily data shows a net balance of approximately -501 BTC leaving exchanges, while weekly cumulative withdrawals reached around -6,469 BTC. This suggests that long-term holders are not seeking immediate liquidity. Instead, coins continue moving into cold storage, reducing available supply and limiting near-term selling pressure as the market navigates the broader macro shock. Bitcoin Tests Long-Term Support After Market Repricing The weekly chart shows Bitcoin trading near $69,700 as the market attempts to stabilize following a sharp correction from the late-2025 highs. After reaching levels above $110,000 during the peak of the rally, BTC entered a corrective phase marked by lower highs and increasing volatility. The recent decline pushed price toward the $65,000 region before buyers stepped in, producing the current rebound attempt around the $70,000 level. Technically, Bitcoin is now positioned between several key moving averages that define the broader trend. The price is currently trading below the 50-week moving average, which sits near the $90,000 region and is now acting as dynamic resistance. Meanwhile, the 100-week moving average is positioned around the mid-$80,000 zone, reinforcing the overhead pressure that emerged after the breakdown earlier this year. On the downside, the 200-week moving average continues to trend upward near the $58,000–$60,000 range, forming a major long-term support level for the current cycle. Historically, this moving average has served as a structural floor during major market corrections. From a macro perspective, Bitcoin remains within a broader multi-year uptrend despite the recent drawdown. The current consolidation around $70,000 suggests the market is attempting to establish a new support base before determining whether the next move will be a deeper correction or a renewed attempt to reclaim higher levels. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

Weiterlesen

Pi Network’s PI Taps 3-Month High, Bitcoin (BTC) Fights for $68K: Weekend Watch

  vor 2 Monaten

Bitcoin’s price failed to maintain the $70,000 level and has dropped by an additional two grand since then, currently fighting for the $68,000 support. The altcoins are bleeding out as well daily, with ETH going below $2,000, and BNB dipping beneath $630. PI is among the few exceptions today with a notable price surge. BTC Drops to $68K Last Saturday was quite eventful as the US and Israel initiated air strikes against Iran. The Middle Eastern country retaliated immediately against numerous nations in the region, even though its Supreme Leader was killed during the attacks. BTC reacted with an immediate price drop from $67,000 to $63,000 after the initial strikes, but rebounded to $68,000 on the same day. Its fluctuations continued as other financial markets opened on Monday morning, but the bulls seemed in control. By Wednesday, they had driven the cryptocurrency to its highest level in a month at $74,000. After gaining $11,000 since the Saturday low, BTC was due for a correction that began on the same day and culminated earlier on Saturday. As reported yesterday, bitcoin lost the $70,000 level following a weak US jobs report and Trump’s latest remarks on Iran and Cuba. It kept dropping to a multi-day low of $67,500 marked on Saturday morning. It has rebounded to roughy $68,000 since then, but it’s still 4% down daily. Its market cap has declined to $1.360 trillion, while its dominance over the alts is at 56.6%. BTCUSD Mar 7. Source: TradingView PI Defies the Market The graph below will clearly demonstrate that the bears continue to dominate the altcoin market. ETH is down by nearly 5% to under $2,000 now, SOL has lost a similar percentage to $84, while BNB, XRP, DOGE, BCH, and XMR are down by 2-3%. Even more painful losses are evident from SKY, ZEC, SUI, and AAVE. In fact, the only notable exception from the top 100 alts is Pi Network’s native token. PI has soared by another 13% daily and now trades close to $0.23 for the first time in three months. Perhaps the most probable reason behind this impressive performance is the ongoing protocol updates . Nevertheless, the total crypto market cap has shed over $50 billion in a day and is down to $2.4 trillion on CG. Cryptocurrency Market Overview Mar 7. Source: QuantifyCrypto The post Pi Network’s PI Taps 3-Month High, Bitcoin (BTC) Fights for $68K: Weekend Watch appeared first on CryptoPotato .

Weiterlesen

Florida stablecoin plans clash with Washington crypto controversy

  vor 2 Monaten

Florida is moving closer to establishing its own state-level stablecoin regulatory framework after the State Senate approved Senate Bill 314 on Friday, March 6. Reacting to the development, Samuel Armes, founder and president of the Florida Blockchain Business Association, described the vote as a historic milestone in a post on X. The longtime crypto advocate added that he expects Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, another supporter of digital assets, to sign the bill into law sometime next month. In response to this anticipation, a spokesperson for DeSantis claimed that the legislature has not yet sent the bill to the governor, assuring individuals that once the bill arrives on the governor’s desk, he will review the final draft. At the same time, with the US state edging closer to a milestone in its quest to become the latest jurisdiction to adopt local stablecoins regulation, the US federal regulatory approach to cryptocurrency is widely criticized. This occurred after Senator Elizabeth Warren said she opposed the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s settlement with Tron founder Justin Sun. The federal agency issued Sun a free pass, Warren said, though the crypto billionaire allocated substantial funds to initiatives connected to US President Donald Trump and his family. Florida seeks to become a leading hub for digital asset investment in the US SB 314 and Florida House Bill 175 seek to establish a regulatory framework to streamline the payment system for stablecoin issuers in the state. In this framework, sources noted that authorities will uphold consumer protection rules and regulations governing financial stability, which are in line with the federal GENIUS Act , citing information from Senator Colleen Burton, a member of the Florida House of Representatives for the 40th district. Notably, the GENIUS Act was enacted into law on July 18 last year. In the meantime, regarding Florida’s stablecoin bill, sources acknowledged that it plays a crucial role in the state’s financial system by updating the Florida Control of Money Laundering in Money Services Business Act to include payment stablecoins. Moreover, this bill requires stablecoin issuers to strictly adhere to the regulations and restrictions that mandate a license to operate. Another role is that the proposed regulation excludes certain payment stablecoins from securities classification. Following this clarity, reports highlighted that the Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) must receive written notification from any out-of-state qualified payment stablecoin issuer, according to the bill summary . The SB 314 further stresses that the OFR will only supervise certain payment stablecoins. In contrast, others will fall under joint oversight by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, an independent bureau within the US Department of the Treasury. At this point, several analysts commented that Florida’s new rules demonstrate a trend of state-level stablecoin regulation while broader federal crypto market laws remain stalled. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that a key component of Florida’s proposed legislation concerns whether stablecoin issuers may pay interest to token holders. Regarding this component, reports stated that the bill forbids qualified stablecoin issuers from offering interest, provided that such payments are prohibited under federal law. In response to this statement, several analysts claimed that interest-bearing stablecoins have ignited heated discussions in Washington. In this debate, the banking group flagged yield-bearing tokens as a direct threat to regulated banks’ deposits, citing potential risks to both financial stability and fair oversight. These concerns have had significant effects, hindering the passage of broader crypto regulations in Congress. To support this claim, reports noted that, despite the GENIUS Act providing a framework for federal stablecoin issuance, broader crypto-market structure legislation, known as the Clarity Act, is pending Senate approval. Florida embraces the importance of safeguarding confidential information As Florida seeks to solidify its position as a leading digital asset investment hub in the US, reports discovered that the state’s lawmakers approved CS/CS/SB 1440, a bill related to SB 314. This bill improves the confidentiality safeguards of information held by authorities overseeing digital asset service providers. The regulation applies particularly to virtual currency firms, trust companies that serve as stablecoin issuers, and qualified payment stablecoin issuers. Meanwhile, when reports reached out to sources familiar with the situation for comment on the matter, speaking on conditions of anonymity, they alleged that the new safeguards were introduced with a view to protecting trade secrets and other sensitive operational data issued to the Florida Office of Financial Regulation. Supporters, on the other hand, argued that those safeguards are key to persuading digital asset firms to embrace regulated frameworks while protecting their sensitive information. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Weiterlesen

Copyright © 2026 Aktuelle Krypto Kurse. - Impressum