In an interview with CoinDesk, S.Y. Lee pointed to Worldcoin’s extended lockups as precedent for longer runways.
Many view Cardano as undervalued at current market levels, with some highlighting the benefits of leveraging the dip to buy now. Notably, this belief comes from the Cardano network's massive potential, its bullish scalability and growth roadmap, and optimistic technical analysis. Visit Website
What to Know: Institutional analysis confirms the quantum threat to Bitcoin is real but mitigated by long development timelines and potential soft-fork upgrades. The market focus is shifting from theoretical Layer-1 risks to immediate application-layer disruptions, specifically in the $85B creator economy. SUBBD Token uses AI voice cloning and personal assistants to eliminate high platform fees, offering a decentralized alternative for creators. Early traction is evident with over $1.4 million raised in presale, supported by a staking model offering 20% APY in the first year. The existential anxiety surrounding Bitcoin often boils down to a single, catastrophic ‘what if’: a quantum computer eventually cracking the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). It’s the ultimate doomsday script. However, recent analysis highlights that while the quantum threat identified by firms like CoinShares is mathematically valid, the timeline is, frankly, widely overstated. Most institutional researchers agree that ‘Q-Day’ (the moment encryption breaks) is a real eventuality, but it remains decades away. That gives the network plenty of time to implement quantum-resistant soft forks. Traders have largely shrugged off these periodic ‘doom’ reports. Why? Because institutions are growing comfortable with Bitcoin’s technical roadmap, viewing the blockchain not as a static target, but as an evolving protocol capable of defensive upgrades. The real action isn’t in Layer-1 existential risks anymore. It’s shifting to the application layer, where Artificial Intelligence is actively dismantling legacy business models. While the quantum threat remains a distant theoretical battle, the $85B creator economy is undergoing a tangible, immediate overhaul. Legacy platforms still gouge creators with fees as high as 70%, creating a vacuum for decentralized alternatives. This shift from theoretical infrastructure risks to practical solutions is exemplified by projects like SUBBD Token ($SUBBD) , which uses AI to solve the monetization crisis facing digital creators today. Read more about $SUBBD here. Bitcoin’s Quantum Defense vs. The Immediate AI Shift The ‘quantum apocalypse’ narrative often misses the nuance of Bitcoin’s architectural flexibility. CoinShares and similar research bodies have noted that threatening Bitcoin would require millions of physical qubits, technology that current roadmaps from IBM and Google place years in the future. Plus, the risk is primarily concentrated on ‘pay-to-public-key’ (P2PK) addresses from the Satoshi era. Modern address types and potential soft forks (introducing schemes like Lamport signatures) significantly mitigate this risk. The market sees this clearly: Bitcoin’s security model is robust enough to survive the quantum age. Conversely, the disruption in the content creation sector is happening in real-time. The current landscape is fragmented, with creators forcing their fanbases across multiple apps while losing revenue to intermediaries. SUBBD Token addresses this friction by merging an EVM-compatible smart contract architecture with proprietary AI models. Unlike the theoretical defense required for Bitcoin, the utility here is immediate: AI Personal Assistants that automate interactions and AI Voice Cloning tools that let influencers scale their presence without burnout. It represents a distinct shift in investor focus. While capital parked in Bitcoin is a hedge against monetary debasement, capital flowing into the creator economy is a bet on the efficiency of AI. By utilizing the Ethereum network, SUBBD offers a dual-layer value proposition: the security of an established Layer-1 and the explosive growth potential of AI-driven content monetization that bypasses the restrictive policies of Web2 giants. Explore the SUBBD Token ecosystem. Disintermediation Through AI and Tokenomics Current economic inefficiencies in the creator economy are staggering. When platforms take majority cuts of revenue, they inadvertently incentivize the migration to Web3. SUBBD capitalizes on this by offering a decentralized framework where the $SUBBD token serves as the currency of interaction, effectively wiping out the 30-70% fees standard in the industry. The project’s presale data reflects a strong appetite for this model, with $1.47M already raised. The financial structure is designed to retain liquidity and incentivize long-term participation. The platform offers a staking protocol with a fixed 20% APY for the first year, a rate that significantly outpaces traditional DeFi yields. This is coupled with ‘XP multipliers’ and access to token-gated content, creating a closed-loop economy where the token has improved velocity. For investors, the current presale price of $0.0574925 represents an entry point into a sector where AI and crypto aren’t just buzzwords, but functional tools solving the ‘middleman problem.’ Beyond simple payments, the integration of AI allows for novel revenue streams. Through AI Influencer Creation and object recognition, creators can generate passive income, while fans gain access to exclusive, token-gated interactions. This moves the industry beyond the ‘tipping’ model into a robust, asset-based creator economy. As Bitcoin secures the base layer of value against future threats, projects like SUBBD are actively re-engineering how value is generated and distributed right now. Buy $SUBBD here. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are high-risk assets. Always conduct your own due diligence before investing.
BitcoinWorld Bithumb Incident Sparks Urgent Regulatory Scrutiny as South Korean Authorities Prepare Critical Parliament Report SEOUL, South Korea – Financial authorities face mounting pressure to address systemic vulnerabilities in the nation’s cryptocurrency sector. This pressure follows a staggering 60 trillion won erroneous payment incident at Bithumb, one of South Korea’s largest digital asset exchanges. Consequently, regulators will deliver a crucial report to the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee on February 10. This report will likely catalyze significant amendments to the pending Digital Asset Basic Act, aiming to enforce traditional financial-grade controls on crypto platforms. The Bithumb Incident and Its Immediate Aftermath Money Today first reported the scheduled parliamentary briefing. The incident itself involved an erroneous transaction order of monumental scale. While specific technical details remain under investigation, the event exposed critical flaws in internal risk management systems. Financial authorities immediately initiated a review of Bithumb’s operational protocols. Furthermore, they began coordinating with other agencies to assess the broader implications for market stability and investor protection. This proactive response highlights the growing integration of crypto assets into the national financial oversight framework. The scale of the error, equivalent to tens of billions of US dollars, instantly captured the attention of lawmakers and the public. It underscored a persistent concern: cryptocurrency exchanges handle vast sums yet sometimes operate without the stringent safeguards mandatory for banks. The upcoming parliamentary session will serve as a formal accountability mechanism. Regulators must explain both the cause of the failure and their proposed preventative measures. Regulatory Evolution and the Digital Asset Basic Act South Korea’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation has evolved significantly from initial skepticism to structured legislation. The Digital Asset Basic Act represents the culmination of this years-long process. Designed as a comprehensive framework, the act seeks to establish clear rules for issuance, listing, and trading. However, the Bithumb incident has injected new urgency into debates about its specific provisions, particularly those concerning operational integrity. From Reactive to Proactive Oversight Historically, South Korean regulation reacted to market crises. The 2017 boom led to real-name trading rules. Similarly, the 2022 Terra-Luna collapse accelerated legislative efforts. Now, the Bithumb error shifts focus from external market risks to internal exchange governance. Discussions in the Political Affairs Committee will therefore concentrate on mandating controls like real-time transaction monitoring, capital reserve requirements, and independent internal audit functions. These measures are standard in traditional finance but remain inconsistent across crypto platforms. The table below outlines key regulatory milestones leading to the current moment: Year Event/Regulation Primary Focus 2017 Real-Name Bank Account Verification Mandated Anti-Money Laundering (AML), User Identification 2021 Specific Financial Information Act (FATF Travel Rule) Transaction Reporting, International Compliance 2022 Terra-Luna Collapse Stablecoin Regulation, Investor Protection 2023-2024 Drafting of Digital Asset Basic Act Comprehensive Market Framework 2025 Bithumb Erroneous Payment Incident Internal Exchange Controls, Operational Risk Comparative Analysis: Crypto vs. Traditional Finance Controls The core argument emerging from the incident is the need for parity in risk management. Traditional financial institutions in South Korea operate under a dense web of requirements enforced by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Capital Adequacy: Banks must maintain capital ratios against operational risk losses. Crypto exchanges often have no equivalent mandatory buffer. Internal Control Reporting: Listed companies must file annual reports on their internal accounting controls. This is not uniformly required for crypto exchanges. Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS): The national banking system uses KRW RTGS for final, irrevocable settlements. Crypto settlements can lack similar finality and oversight layers. Error Correction Protocols: Traditional payment networks have standardized, immediate recall procedures for erroneous transactions. Crypto transactions are often immutable, making errors potentially permanent. Therefore, the parliamentary report will likely detail how the Digital Asset Basic Act can bridge these gaps. Potential measures include mandatory participation in a financial dispute settlement scheme and stricter licensing requirements tied to proven internal control systems. Expert Perspectives on Systemic Risk and Market Impact Financial technology analysts emphasize that the incident is not merely a one-off error. It is a symptom of an industry scaling faster than its governance. Professor Kim Hyoung-joong, a cybersecurity expert at Korea University, notes that operational risk in fintech increases exponentially with transaction volume and complexity. “An exchange like Bithumb processes thousands of transactions per second,” he states. “Without automated, multi-layer verification systems matching those of a stock exchange, human or software errors can propagate instantly.” Market impact has been twofold. Immediately, the incident shook investor confidence, highlighting counterparty risk. In the longer term, however, it may strengthen the market. Tighter regulations typically increase institutional participation. They provide the legal certainty large asset managers require. Jang Seok-hyun, a partner at a Seoul-based blockchain venture fund, argues, “Stringent operational rules, while increasing compliance costs, act as a quality seal. They separate serious, long-term platforms from less secure ones, ultimately benefiting the entire ecosystem.” International Context and South Korea’s Leadership Role Globally, regulators are grappling with similar challenges. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regime imposes strict custody and governance rules. Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has long required exchanges to maintain robust internal controls and cold wallet storage standards. South Korea’s response to the Bithumb incident will be closely watched as a case study in reactive policy refinement. A swift and decisive regulatory move could position South Korea as a leader in operational security standards for digital assets. Conversely, a weak response could undermine its ambition to be a global digital finance hub. The February 10 report is therefore more than a procedural update. It is a signal of regulatory intent to both domestic consumers and the international financial community. Conclusion The upcoming parliamentary report on the Bithumb incident marks a pivotal moment for South Korea’s cryptocurrency industry. Regulators will detail the causes of the 60 trillion won error and outline necessary reforms to the Digital Asset Basic Act. This process underscores an inevitable shift: as digital assets mature, they must adopt the rigorous internal controls of traditional finance. The outcome will shape not only the future of Bithumb but also set a new security benchmark for crypto exchanges nationwide, influencing investor protection and market integrity for years to come. FAQs Q1: What exactly was the Bithumb incident? It involved an erroneous payment order worth approximately 60 trillion won issued by the Bithumb cryptocurrency exchange. The exact nature is under investigation, but it revealed significant flaws in internal transaction controls. Q2: Why is this report to the South Korean parliament so important? The report will formally present the findings of financial authorities to lawmakers. It is expected to directly influence the drafting of new, stricter regulations within the upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act, particularly regarding exchange operational security. Q3: How does the Digital Asset Basic Act currently address exchange controls? The act, still in development, aims to create a comprehensive framework. The Bithumb incident is pushing lawmakers to explicitly mandate internal control systems, audit requirements, and risk management protocols on par with banks. Q4: What are the potential consequences for Bithumb? Beyond potential fines, Bithumb will likely be required to overhaul its internal systems entirely. It may also face stricter ongoing supervision and could see its license conditional on implementing the new standards set by the amended act. Q5: How will this affect other cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea? Any new regulations stemming from this incident will apply to all licensed exchanges. The entire industry will need to invest in upgrading compliance and internal control infrastructure, potentially raising operational costs but also increasing overall market trust. This post Bithumb Incident Sparks Urgent Regulatory Scrutiny as South Korean Authorities Prepare Critical Parliament Report first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Digital asset manager CoinShares says quantum computing is not an immediate threat to Bitcoin, with only a small share of Bitcoin realistically exposed to a theoretical quantum attack. The firm argues that current machines are far too weak to break core cryptography and that the network has time to adapt. The research, led by CoinShares Bitcoin research head Christopher Bendiksen, estimates that while a pool of older addresses exposes public keys, the number of coins that could be seized and sold quickly is limited, and any attack would not change Bitcoin’s supply cap or proof-of-work. Limited exposure to quantum attacks According to a CoinShares research note, “Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerability is not an immediate crisis but a foreseeable engineering consideration, with ample time for adaptation.” The firm argues that while quantum algorithms could eventually threaten signatures or hashing, today’s capabilities fall far short of a practical danger. CoinShares frames the issue as a process question rather than an emergency. The network has clear upgrade paths if risks materialize, and any changes should be weighed against fundamentals rather than speculative worst-case scenarios. CoinShares estimates about 1.7 million BTC, roughly 8% of supply, sit in legacy pay-to-public-key (P2PK) addresses where public keys are exposed. Bendiksen analyzed a similar pool of about 1.63 million BTC and argued that just 10,230 BTC in that set sit in larger wallets that are actually worth attacking. He said a little over 7,000 BTC are in addresses holding 100 to 1,000 BTC, and roughly 3,230 BTC are in addresses with 1,000 to 10,000 BTC, together equating to $719.1 million at current prices. Bendiksen added that such a sale could “resemble a routine trade.” The remaining 1.62 million BTC in that pool are spread across wallets holding under 100 BTC. Bendiksen claimed each would take a millennium to unlock even in the “most outlandishly optimistic” quantum advancement scenario, and CoinShares separately argued that at most around 10,000 BTC could realistically be compromised and sold suddenly. Technology still far from practical risk CoinShares attributes the theoretical risk to algorithms such as Shor’s, which could break elliptic-curve signatures, and Grover’s, which could weaken SHA-256. However, the firm stresses that neither could alter Bitcoin’s 21 million supply cap or bypass proof-of-work. Breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography would require machines with millions of fault-tolerant qubits, far beyond the 105 qubits reported for Google’s latest quantum computer, Willow. Researchers estimate that even the most advanced systems are 10 to 100,000 times too weak, pushing meaningful risk into the 2030s or later, and attacking live transactions would require near-instant computation that is not feasible today. As Bendiksen put it, “Recent advancements, including demonstrations by Google and others, represent progress but fall short of the scale needed for real-world attacks on Bitcoin.” Debate over future upgrades The at-risk coins are unspent transaction outputs tied to addresses with visible keys, many dating back to the Satoshi era. This has sparked debate over whether to implement a quantum-resistant hard fork now or wait. Some, including Strategy’s (formerly known as MicroStrategy) Michael Saylor and Blockstream CEO Adam Back, argue the threat is overblown and unlikely to disrupt the network for decades, a view Bendiksen shares. Others, such as Capriole Investments’ Charles Edwards, see an “existential threat” and say an upgrade now could strengthen security and even lead to a repricing once a solution is in place, with proposals like post-quantum signatures discussed by researchers such as Blockstream’s Jonas Nick. CoinShares cautions that aggressive fixes can introduce risks ranging from software bugs to forced assumptions about dormant coins, potentially eroding Bitcoin’s neutrality. The firm favors gradual, voluntary migration as the pragmatic path. The post CoinShares says quantum computing threat to Bitcoin remains years away appeared first on Invezz
Crypto markets flatlined over the weekend, as investors licked their wounds following the massive $700 billion rout last week. The following several days could see more volatility with more government shutdown data on the way and a key inflation report. US President Trump reiterated his 100,000 target for the Dow Jones as US stock futures rose on Monday morning. Meanwhile, precious metal markets are recovering, with gold reclaiming $5,000 per ounce and silver rising back to $80 per ounce. Economic Events Feb. 9 to 13 The latest partial US government shutdown has already affected key data releases. The delayed December Retail Sales data is due on Monday, shedding light on the state of consumer spending. This is followed by labor market data in the form of the January Jobs Report on Wednesday and Initial Jobless Claims data on Thursday. “The most important thing, believe it or not, is the Labor Department’s nonfarm payroll report on Wednesday,” said CNBC’s Jim Cramer. “If that comes in soft, it means the Fed can keep cutting rates, and that’s great news for the stock market itself.” Another big hitter, January’s CPI Inflation report, is due on Friday. The Consumer Price Index measures the average change over time in the prices paid by consumers for a basket of goods and services. Key Events This Week: 1. December Retail Sales data – Monday 2. January Jobs Report – Wednesday 3. Initial Jobless Claims data – Thursday 4. January Existing Home Sales data – Thursday 5. January CPI Inflation data – Friday 6. 5 Fed speaker events this week More government… — The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) February 8, 2026 These labor market and inflation reports are critical in helping investors and Washington understand what is happening in the US economy, and are a key influence on the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy. “Rate expectations have been remarkably stable over the last couple of weeks,” said Angelo Kourkafas, senior global investment strategist at Edward Jones, as reported by Reuters. “We’ll see if any either weakness in the labor market data or any surprising cool-down in inflation accelerates a bit the timeline for when the market thinks the next rate cut may be delivered.” Crypto Market Outlook Crypto markets barely moved over the weekend, with total capitalization hovering around $2.45 trillion, its lowest level since November 2024. Bitcoin recovered to reclaim $71,000 following its crash to around $60,000 on Friday, but it remains 44% down from its all-time high and in a bear market . Ether prices reclaimed $2,100 but couldn’t advance any further. The asset remains deep in bear market territory, down 58% from its August all-time high. The alcoins saw a minor bounce, but most of them are still on the floor after being obliterated in last week’s market crash. The post 3 Major Things That Could Move Crypto Markets This Week appeared first on CryptoPotato .
What to Know: Bitcoin claiming $70,000 confirms a bull market structure, targeting $100,000 driven by institutional ETF inflows. The main invalidation level for the bullish thesis is a weekly close below $68,000, which could trigger a retest of $60,000. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) uses the Solana Virtual Machine to bring high-speed smart contracts to Bitcoin, attracting over $31M in early capital. Capital rotation from $BTC to L2 infrastructure usually speeds up after Bitcoin breaks all-time highs, favoring early-stage projects. Bitcoin has decisively reclaimed the critical $70,000 level. In doing so, it shattered the bear market narrative that haunted investors throughout 2024’s tedious chop. The world’s leading digital asset isn’t just up, it has fundamentally shifted market structure. Previous resistance? It’s now a support floor. Driven by relentless spot ETF inflows and renewed institutional appetite, this move signals the start of a parabolic phase where price discovery is the norm, not the exception. It’s not just one catalyst. It’s a perfect storm: macro liquidity injections, the supply shock finally hitting home, and a ‘flight to quality’ among TradFi giants. With $BTC firmly above $70k, analysts aren’t asking if the bull market is back. They’re asking how high the ceiling goes. (Frankly, the targets are getting aggressive). Standard Chartered and Bernstein have both revised forecasts upward, eyeing $150,000 to $200,000 as the new cyclical top. But Bitcoin’s dominance creates a liquidity vacuum. As BTC stabilizes, capital historically rotates into high-beta infrastructure plays, specifically those solving scalability. The market is hunting for the ‘ETH of Bitcoin.’ While $BTC offers stability, the aggressive multiples usually hide in the emerging L2 ecosystem. That’s where projects like Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) are positioning themselves to capture spillover demand. Visit the $HYPER presale now. Technical Outlook: Why $70,000 Was the Trap and $100,000 Is the Target Reclaiming $70,000 is technically massive. Why? It kills the ‘double top’ thesis bears clung to for months. Price action has formed a clear higher-high structure on the weekly timeframe, with the 50-week moving average curling up to provide dynamic support near $62,000. Plus, momentum indicators like the RSI have reset from overbought conditions. That suggests there’s plenty of room to push toward the psychological $100,000 barrier without burning out. Institutional flows tell the real story. Sustained buying pressure from BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC created a supply shock miners simply can’t offset. On-chain data shows long-term holder supply remains remarkably sticky despite prices nearing all-time highs. ‘Smart money’ isn’t selling into strength. They’re waiting for higher valuations. Ideally, Bitcoin consolidates between $70,000 and $75,000 to build a base. Then? An impulsive move targeting $85k-$92k, eventually challenging $100k by year-end. Failing to hold $68,000 would invalidate this structure and likely trigger a retest of the $60,000 liquidity pool. But with current macro tailwinds, the path of least resistance is decidedly up. You can buy $HYPER here. Bitcoin Hyper Targets High Beta Upside as L2 Narrative Heats Up As Bitcoin cements its role as ‘digital gold,’ demand for a transactional layer is peaking. Investors looking beyond simple $BTC gains are rotating into Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER). The project addresses Bitcoin’s main headaches: slow transactions, high fees, and zero smart contract programmability. By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) as a Bitcoin Layer 2, Bitcoin Hyper offers Solana’s speed with Bitcoin’s security. The market’s appetite is clear. According to official presale data, Bitcoin Hyper has already raised $31.3M. It’s a massive signal of early validation. Tokens are currently priced at $0.0136753, offering an entry point for investors betting on the ecosystem’s growth. With a decentralized canonical bridge and Rust-based smart contracts, the project is a serious contender to unlock Bitcoin’s $1.5T capital base for DeFi. Smart money is moving. While presale assets carry inherent volatility, Bitcoin Hyper’s risk-reward profile aligns with a historical trend: infrastructure plays often outperform the base asset during aggressive bull cycles. Buy $HYPER here. This article does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly presales and high-beta assets, carry significant risk and volatility. Your should conduct your own independent research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions.
Patrick Bet-David, host of the PBD Podcast and founder of Valuetainment, has revealed that he increased his exposure to XRP during the recent crypto market sell-off. The disclosure came during a recent podcast discussion on market volatility, emotional investing, and the difficulty of executing long-term strategies during drawdowns. Visit Website
The Wall Street investment bank estimates the crypto firm holds at least 148 tonnes of physical gold holdings, joining top 30 global holders of bullion.
Tron's Justin Sun supports TRX's strategic treasury initiative. TRX prices rise, signaling short-term recovery, yet long-term climate is uncertain. Continue Reading: Tron Makes Bold Moves in TRX Tokens Acquisition The post Tron Makes Bold Moves in TRX Tokens Acquisition appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .