A Bitcoin wallet referenced in the alleged ransom demand for Nancy Guthrie has recorded new activity, according to reports from TMZ and Fox News. The update comes as law enforcement agencies expand their efforts to locate the missing 84-year-old near Tucson, Arizona. Visit Website
BitcoinWorld Federal Reserve Independence: Critical Shield Limiting USD Jobs Data Impact – Commerzbank Analysis FRANKFURT, March 2025 – Currency markets demonstrated remarkable restraint following the latest US employment report, as concerns about Federal Reserve independence created a powerful counterweight to traditional economic data reactions, according to comprehensive analysis from Commerzbank economists. The US dollar’s muted response to stronger-than-expected jobs numbers reveals deeper structural tensions within America’s monetary policy framework that could reshape currency valuations throughout 2025. Federal Reserve Independence: The Critical USD Stabilizer Commerzbank’s currency strategists identified Federal Reserve independence as the dominant factor capping US dollar movements despite robust employment figures. Historically, strong jobs data triggered immediate dollar appreciation through interest rate expectations. However, recent political pressures on monetary policy decisions have fundamentally altered this relationship. The Federal Reserve’s operational autonomy faces unprecedented scrutiny from multiple government branches. Consequently, currency traders now weigh institutional stability alongside economic indicators when positioning dollar exposures. Market participants increasingly question whether employment data alone can drive monetary policy decisions. This skepticism stems from visible tensions between the executive branch and central bank officials regarding inflation management priorities. Furthermore, legislative proposals concerning Federal Reserve governance have introduced additional uncertainty. Currency analysts therefore interpret strong employment reports through a dual lens: traditional economic strength versus potential political interference in interest rate decisions. Employment Data Analysis in Political Context The March 2025 jobs report revealed several significant trends that normally would have propelled dollar strength. Non-farm payrolls expanded by 275,000 positions, exceeding consensus estimates of 200,000. Additionally, wage growth maintained a steady 4.2% annual pace despite moderating inflation pressures. Unemployment remained at a historically low 3.8%, marking 28 consecutive months below 4%. These metrics traditionally signal imminent Federal Reserve tightening measures. However, currency markets responded with only modest dollar appreciation against major counterparts. The DXY dollar index gained just 0.3% following the data release, compared to historical averages exceeding 0.8% for similar employment surprises. This muted reaction reflects growing market consensus that political considerations may override data-dependent policymaking. Commerzbank’s analysis suggests traders now discount employment data by approximately 40% when forecasting Federal Reserve actions, a substantial shift from previous decades. Historical Precedents and Institutional Memory Currency markets retain institutional memory of previous challenges to central bank independence. The 2020-2024 period witnessed numerous public disagreements between presidential administrations and Federal Reserve leadership regarding appropriate policy responses to economic crises. These conflicts established precedents that continue influencing currency valuations today. Market participants particularly recall the 2022 episode when explicit pressure was applied regarding interest rate timing. Comparative analysis reveals interesting patterns across developed economies. The European Central Bank maintains stronger institutional protections against political interference, contributing to euro stability during similar employment surprises. Meanwhile, the Bank of England faces challenges comparable to the Federal Reserve, with sterling demonstrating similar muted responses to economic data. This global pattern suggests currency markets increasingly price institutional stability alongside traditional economic fundamentals. Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanisms Federal Reserve independence concerns affect currency markets through multiple transmission channels. First, uncertainty about policy consistency reduces the predictive value of economic indicators. Second, perceived political influence increases risk premiums demanded by international dollar holders. Third, institutional uncertainty may prompt reserve managers to gradually diversify away from dollar-denominated assets. Commerzbank’s research identifies all three mechanisms currently operating in currency markets. The interest rate channel demonstrates particular sensitivity to independence concerns. Normally, strong employment data would immediately shift expectations toward earlier or larger rate hikes. Current market pricing shows only partial adjustment, with futures markets pricing approximately 60% of the traditional policy response. This discount reflects genuine uncertainty about whether employment strength will translate into actual policy changes given political constraints. USD Response to Employment Data: Historical Comparison Period Employment Beat DXY Response Policy Certainty 2015-2019 +75k jobs +0.85% High 2020-2024 +75k jobs +0.52% Medium 2025 +75k jobs +0.31% Low Global Currency Implications and Risk Assessment The muted dollar response to employment data creates ripple effects across global currency markets. Emerging market currencies typically benefit from dollar stability, as reduced volatility facilitates carry trade strategies. Meanwhile, major currency pairs exhibit altered correlation patterns with US economic indicators. The euro-dollar exchange rate now demonstrates stronger sensitivity to European political developments than American employment data, representing a significant structural shift. Commerzbank’s risk assessment framework identifies several concerning developments: Reduced policy predictability increases hedging costs for international corporations Currency volatility compression may mask underlying economic imbalances Reduced signaling effectiveness of economic data complicates investment decisions Institutional uncertainty could trigger sudden repricing events These factors collectively increase systemic risk within global currency markets. Market participants must now monitor political developments alongside economic indicators when managing currency exposures. This dual monitoring requirement increases operational complexity while potentially reducing market efficiency. Expert Perspectives on Institutional Stability Dr. Ulrich Leuchtmann, Head of FX Research at Commerzbank, emphasizes the structural nature of these changes. “We’re witnessing a fundamental repricing of institutional risk within currency markets,” he explains. “The Federal Reserve’s operational independence has been a cornerstone of global financial stability for decades. Any erosion of this independence necessarily alters how markets process American economic data.” This perspective aligns with academic research on central bank credibility. Studies consistently demonstrate that perceived independence correlates strongly with currency stability and reduced volatility. The current market behavior suggests participants are gradually adjusting their assessments of Federal Reserve autonomy. This adjustment process may continue throughout 2025 as political developments provide additional information about institutional constraints. Conclusion The relationship between US employment data and dollar valuations has fundamentally transformed due to Federal Reserve independence concerns. Commerzbank’s analysis reveals currency markets now discount traditional economic indicators by approximately 40% when political interference risks appear elevated. This structural shift has profound implications for currency traders, international corporations, and policymakers worldwide. As 2025 progresses, monitoring institutional developments will prove equally important as tracking economic indicators for understanding dollar movements. The Federal Reserve’s ability to maintain operational autonomy despite political pressures will likely determine whether traditional employment-currency relationships reassert themselves or remain permanently altered. FAQs Q1: How does Federal Reserve independence affect currency markets? Federal Reserve independence affects currency markets by ensuring monetary policy decisions respond primarily to economic fundamentals rather than political considerations. When independence appears compromised, currency traders discount economic data because they question whether strong indicators will translate into appropriate policy responses. Q2: Why did the US dollar show limited reaction to strong jobs data? The US dollar showed limited reaction because markets increasingly factor political risks alongside economic indicators. Strong employment data traditionally signals potential interest rate hikes, but concerns about Federal Reserve independence create uncertainty about whether employment strength will actually influence policy decisions. Q3: What historical precedents exist for political pressure on central banks? Historical precedents include the 2020-2024 period when public disagreements occurred between presidential administrations and Federal Reserve leadership. Earlier examples include the 1970s when political considerations influenced monetary policy during high inflation periods, ultimately requiring institutional reforms to restore central bank independence. Q4: How do other central banks compare regarding independence? The European Central Bank maintains stronger statutory independence protections than the Federal Reserve, while the Bank of England faces similar political pressures. These institutional differences help explain why currency markets sometimes react differently to similar economic data across different countries. Q5: What are the long-term implications of reduced Federal Reserve independence? Long-term implications include increased currency volatility, higher risk premiums for dollar assets, potential reserve diversification away from dollars, and reduced effectiveness of monetary policy transmission mechanisms. These factors could gradually diminish the dollar’s dominant position in global finance if independence concerns persist. This post Federal Reserve Independence: Critical Shield Limiting USD Jobs Data Impact – Commerzbank Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Summary Ethereum (ETH-USD) has declined 2.54% to $1,970 and remains more than 35% below its recent peak. Technical indicators show continued downside risk, with key support levels between $1,850 and $1,700. Despite short-term weakness, long-term adoption trends and institutional interest could support recovery in the coming years. By Jose Antonio Gastelum Ethereum ( ETH-USD ) is under renewed pressure as the broader crypto market struggles to regain momentum. The second-largest digital asset fell 2.54% to around $1,970, extending losses that have now exceeded 35% from its recent market peak. The decline reflects a mix of technical weakness, fading liquidity and cautious investor positioning, even as some long-term indicators suggest structural support may be forming beneath current levels. Volatility returns as key levels come into focus After forming a short-term base above $1,950, Ether briefly climbed past $2,130 before retreating below $2,050. Analysts note that resistance remains clustered between $2,065 and $2,120, while support sits near $1,950 and then around $1,850. A break below these zones could expose the asset to deeper downside pressure. ETH-USD price action (Source: TradingView) Research director Vetle Lunde of K33 Research said Ethereum’s weakness follows last autumn’s rapid surge, when large inflows into spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds and a sharp rise in open positions left the market overstretched. Assets with higher volatility profiles tend to react more aggressively than Bitcoin during corrections, amplifying price swings. Some market observers warn that recent rebounds lack conviction. Trading activity remains muted, suggesting buyers have not yet returned in force. If support fails decisively, analysts see the possibility of a broader move toward lower historical demand areas, potentially even below $1,000 in an extreme scenario. Longer-term fractals and on-chain data suggest consolidation Historical comparisons between the 2021-2022 and 2024-2025 cycles show similarities in how Ether formed an initial bottom before revisiting lower levels, Cointelegraph writes . On weekly charts, the recent drop toward $1,730 resembles an early phase rather than a confirmed long-term floor. On-chain data indicates that significant supply clusters remain above current prices near $2,800 and $3,100, forming strong resistance. Below spot levels, demand concentrations appear around $1,880 and near $1,237, which analysts identify as potential support zones. Derivative market data shows several billion dollars in long positions concentrated between $1,700 and $1,455, levels that could attract further selling pressure. However, more than $12 billion in short liquidity sits near $3,000, suggesting that once downside pressure is absorbed, a recovery could follow. Institutional adoption still developing Chinese Bitcoin miner Jiang Zhuoer argues that U.S. investors remain in the early stages of understanding Ethereum, BitcoinSistemi reports. He compared institutional awareness of Ether today to the broader crypto market in 2014-2015, noting that Bitcoin’s “digital gold” narrative is easier to grasp than Ethereum’s more complex smart contract framework. Zhuoer believes Ethereum’s next major outperformance against Bitcoin could occur in 2026-2027, driven by the migration of traditional financial assets onto blockchain networks. Why this matters Ethereum’s 2.54% drop to $1,970 highlights ongoing volatility and investor uncertainty. Technical indicators point to potential further downside, but structural demand and exchange outflows suggest accumulation at lower levels. The balance between short-term risk and long-term adoption trends will likely define Ether’s trajectory in the coming months. Read also: Ethereum Foundation partners with SEAL to strengthen network security This material may contain third-party opinions; none of the data and information on this webpage constitutes investment advice according to our Disclaimer . While we adhere to strict Editorial Integrity , this post may contain references to products from our partners. Original Post
Shiba Inu has struggled since the start of February, yet two major pace-setting moving averages have yet to interact on significant timeframes. Notably, this is a rare event, as Shiba Inu typically experiences several crosses between the 200-period and 50-period moving averages (MA) in the past. Visit Website
Bitcoin is attempting to reclaim the $70,000 level after weeks of volatility. Yet repeated failures to hold that threshold with confirmation suggest that demand remains fragile. Each push above this psychological barrier has been met with renewed selling pressure. Reinforcing the view that the market is still navigating a corrective phase rather than establishing a sustained recovery. Sentiment remains cautious as liquidity conditions tighten and traders look for clearer signs of stabilization. Related Reading: Ethereum Supply on Exchanges Mirrors 2016 Levels: What Happens Next? Recent data shared by top on-chain analyst Maartunn highlights a notable shift among large holders. According to the analysis, many whales who entered the market near the $96,000 region are now sitting on significant unrealized losses following the subsequent price decline. After briefly testing those higher levels, Bitcoin reversed sharply, leaving late-cycle entrants exposed to downside pressure. This dynamic suggests that some large investors may be reassessing risk, either reducing exposure or repositioning portfolios amid uncertain macro and crypto-specific conditions. Such behavior often contributes to heightened volatility, particularly when leveraged positions unwind. Whale Capitulation Signals Market Redistribution Phase Recent data shared by on-chain analyst Maartunn highlights a sharp wave of realized losses among large Bitcoin holders, pointing to an evolving market structure rather than a static downturn. According to the figures, realized losses reached approximately $944 million on Feb. 3, $431 million on Feb. 4, $1.46 billion on Feb. 5, and $915 million on Feb. 6. These numbers reflect significant selling activity from investors who accumulated BTC near higher price levels and are now exiting positions under pressure. Such realized losses typically indicate capitulation among late-cycle entrants. When whales sell at a loss, it often means that conviction has weakened or that risk management considerations are taking priority. However, this process also implies redistribution. Coins do not disappear; they transfer from weaker hands to buyers willing to absorb supply at lower prices. Maartunn notes that the estimated cost basis for the newest cohort of large holders is now around $90,000. This suggests that a substantial portion of recent accumulation occurred near that level, creating a potential overhead resistance zone if the price attempts to recover. Markets often evolve through these phases of redistribution. While short-term sentiment may remain fragile, shifts in cost basis and ownership structure can eventually lay the groundwork for stabilization and future trend development. Related Reading: Ethereum Crash Below $2,000 Triggers Record Token Movement: Hinting At Capitulation Bitcoin Price Structure Signals Continued Distribution Phase Bitcoin’s recent price structure reflects a market still dominated by distribution pressure rather than sustained demand recovery. After failing multiple times to consolidate above the $90K–$100K region, BTC entered a persistent downtrend characterized by lower highs and increasingly aggressive selloffs. The latest decline toward the $60K–$70K zone came with a sharp expansion in volume, typically associated with forced liquidations, panic exits, or large portfolio reallocations. From a technical perspective, price now trades clearly below the major moving averages shown on the chart, all of which are trending downward. This configuration usually signals a mature corrective phase rather than a temporary pullback. The inability to reclaim those averages quickly suggests weak spot demand and continued caution among institutional participants. Related Reading: Binance SAFU Fund Adds 3,600 Bitcoin ($233M) As Market Faces Pressure The $60K–$65K region is emerging as a critical support cluster. A sustained hold above this range could stabilize sentiment and allow consolidation. However, failure to maintain this zone would likely expose deeper liquidity pockets below, potentially accelerating volatility. Short term, price action appears reactive rather than directional. Until volume stabilizes and BTC reclaims key trend indicators, rallies may remain corrective. Market structure currently reflects redistribution rather than confirmed accumulation, keeping downside risks structurally elevated. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com
Bitcoin fell to its lowest level since last Friday’s selloff, diverging sharply from Asian equities that climbed to fresh records and highlighting investors’ lack of confidence in a sustained recovery.
BitcoinWorld Gold Price Analysis Reveals Critical Stalemate as Upbeat Risk Tone Battles Weaker Dollar Ahead of Pivotal US Jobs Report Global gold markets entered a state of pronounced equilibrium in early 2025, displaying a remarkable lack of bullish conviction despite favorable currency conditions. This stagnation, observed across major financial centers from London to New York, stems from a complex tug-of-war between a weakening US dollar and surprisingly positive risk sentiment across equity markets. All eyes now turn toward the upcoming US Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report, a data release historically capable of breaking such deadlocks and setting precious metal trends for subsequent quarters. Gold Price Analysis Reveals Underlying Market Tensions Technical charts from leading trading platforms clearly illustrate gold’s current predicament. The precious metal has consistently failed to maintain momentum above key psychological levels, despite multiple attempts throughout the trading week. Market analysts at institutions like Goldman Sachs and Bloomberg Intelligence note that gold’s typical inverse relationship with the US dollar has partially broken down. Normally, dollar weakness provides substantial support for dollar-denominated commodities like gold. However, simultaneous strength in global equity markets has created countervailing pressure that limits gold’s appeal as a safe-haven asset. Historical data from the World Gold Council reveals this isn’t an unprecedented scenario. Similar patterns emerged during specific periods in 2017 and 2021 when synchronized global growth expectations diminished gold’s defensive characteristics. The current environment differs slightly because central bank purchasing programs continue providing underlying support. According to International Monetary Fund (IMF) statistics, central banks added approximately 1,000 metric tons to reserves in 2024, marking the second-highest annual purchase on record. This institutional demand creates a price floor but hasn’t generated sufficient momentum for sustained rallies. The Dual Forces Shaping Precious Metal Sentiment Two primary forces currently dominate gold market psychology, creating the observed stalemate. First, the US dollar index (DXY) has declined approximately 2.3% from its quarterly peak, pressured by shifting interest rate expectations. Federal Reserve communications throughout January 2025 have reinforced a data-dependent approach, with recent inflation metrics suggesting a potential pause in the tightening cycle. Second, global risk appetite has expanded significantly, with major indices like the S&P 500 and MSCI World Index reaching new highs. This optimism stems from better-than-expected corporate earnings and easing geopolitical tensions in several regions. The relationship between these forces creates a mathematical equilibrium that technical analysts quantify using correlation coefficients. Currently, gold’s 30-day correlation with the DXY stands at -0.65, while its correlation with the S&P 500 has shifted to -0.42 from -0.71 just three months prior. This statistical shift explains why dollar weakness alone cannot propel gold prices higher. Investors must weigh opportunity costs carefully, as money flowing into equities reduces capital available for precious metal allocations. Portfolio managers interviewed by Financial Times confirm this reallocation trend, with pension funds decreasing gold exposure from 3.2% to 2.8% of total assets since December 2024. Expert Perspectives on Market Mechanics Leading commodity strategists provide crucial context for understanding this complex environment. Jane Wilson, Head of Metals Research at Standard Chartered, explains: “Gold currently faces competing narratives. Macroeconomic conditions support higher prices through currency channels, but micro-level investor behavior favors risk assets. The upcoming NFP data will likely resolve this tension by clarifying the Fed’s policy path.” Her analysis aligns with CME Group’s FedWatch Tool probabilities, which show markets pricing a 68% chance of rate stability at the next meeting, contingent on employment figures. Historical precedent offers additional insight. During similar periods of conflicting signals, gold has typically experienced increased volatility rather than directional trends. The 20-day average true range (ATR) for gold futures has expanded by 18% compared to December 2024 levels, confirming this volatility pattern. Options market data reveals growing demand for both call and put options at strike prices surrounding current levels, indicating traders anticipate a significant move but remain uncertain about direction. This uncertainty manifests in reduced trading volumes, with COMEX gold futures volume 12% below their 30-day average. Technical Indicators and Chart Patterns Multiple technical indicators converge to illustrate gold’s consolidation phase. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages have narrowed to their tightest convergence since September 2024, typically preceding significant breakouts. Bollinger Band width has contracted to multi-month lows, suggesting compressed volatility that often expands dramatically. Relative Strength Index (RSI) readings hover in the neutral 45-55 range across multiple timeframes, showing neither overbought nor oversold conditions. Key price levels define the current trading range. Resistance clusters around $2,150 per ounce, a level tested unsuccessfully four times in the past month. Support appears firm near $2,050, where both the 100-day moving average and previous consolidation zones converge. Volume profile analysis identifies high-volume nodes at $2,100, explaining why prices frequently revert to this equilibrium point. The following table summarizes critical technical levels: Level Type Price (USD/oz) Significance Primary Resistance 2,150 2024 high & psychological barrier Secondary Resistance 2,125 50% Fibonacci retracement Pivot Point 2,100 High-volume node & current price Secondary Support 2,075 100-day moving average Primary Support 2,050 200-day moving average & consolidation base Chart patterns reveal additional insights. A symmetrical triangle has developed on daily timeframes, with converging trendlines suggesting an impending directional resolution. This pattern typically breaks in the direction of the preceding trend, which in gold’s case was upward throughout late 2024. However, declining volume during the pattern formation raises questions about breakout conviction. Market technicians await confirmation through either a close above $2,150 with expanding volume or a breakdown below $2,050 with similar volume characteristics. The NFP Report’s Potential Impact Scenarios The US Bureau of Labor Statistics will release January 2025 Non-Farm Payrolls data on February 7, creating potential catalysts for gold’s next directional move. Economists surveyed by Reuters anticipate 180,000 new jobs with unemployment holding at 3.7%. Wage growth expectations center around 4.2% year-over-year. Different outcomes could trigger distinct market reactions: Strong Report (NFP >220,000, Wage Growth >4.5%) : Likely strengthens dollar through renewed Fed hawkish expectations, pressuring gold below support levels. Risk assets might initially rally but could reverse on rate concerns. Moderate Report (NFP 160,000-220,000, Wage Growth 4.0-4.5%) : Maintains current equilibrium with limited volatility. Gold likely continues range-bound trading awaiting additional catalysts. Weak Report (NFP : Weakens dollar through reduced rate hike expectations, potentially triggering gold breakout above resistance. Risk assets might decline, enhancing gold’s safe-haven appeal. Historical analysis reveals gold’s sensitivity to NFP surprises. During the past five years, gold has moved an average of 1.8% on NFP release days when data deviated significantly from expectations. The magnitude of reaction correlates strongly with revisions to Fed policy expectations, as measured by changes in 2-year Treasury yields. Options pricing indicates traders expect a 1.5% move in either direction following this particular report, with slightly higher implied volatility for downside protection. Structural Factors Influencing Long-Term Outlook Beyond immediate technical and fundamental factors, structural elements shape gold’s intermediate trajectory. Central bank demand patterns show no signs of abating, with emerging market institutions continuing diversification away from dollar reserves. Mining supply faces constraints due to declining ore grades and reduced exploration investment throughout 2022-2024. Meanwhile, inflation expectations embedded in Treasury breakeven rates remain elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, preserving gold’s appeal as an inflation hedge despite recent moderation in headline CPI figures. Investment flow data reveals nuanced positioning. While speculative futures positions have decreased according to CFTC Commitments of Traders reports, physical ETF holdings have stabilized after outflows throughout much of 2024. This divergence suggests different investor segments approach gold with varying time horizons and objectives. Retail coin and bar demand, tracked by the US Mint and international refiners, shows seasonal strength typical for early calendar years, providing additional support around current price levels. Conclusion Gold markets currently exhibit a pronounced lack of bullish conviction despite favorable currency conditions, trapped between dollar weakness and positive risk sentiment. This equilibrium reflects competing narratives about economic trajectories and monetary policy paths. The upcoming US Non-Farm Payrolls report represents a potential catalyst for directional resolution, with outcomes likely determining gold’s trajectory through Q1 2025. Technical indicators suggest compressed volatility preceding significant moves, while structural factors provide underlying support. Market participants should monitor employment data closely alongside subsequent Fed communications, as these elements will likely determine whether gold breaks from its current stalemate or continues range-bound trading within established parameters. FAQs Q1: Why isn’t gold rising despite dollar weakness? Gold typically benefits from dollar declines, but current positive risk sentiment in equity markets creates countervailing pressure. Investors allocate capital to risk assets instead of defensive positions like gold, limiting upward momentum despite favorable currency conditions. Q2: How important is the NFP report for gold prices? Extremely important. The employment data significantly influences Federal Reserve policy expectations, which directly impact the US dollar and broader financial markets. Historically, NFP surprises have triggered average gold moves of 1.8% on release days. Q3: What technical levels are most critical for gold currently? Primary resistance sits at $2,150 per ounce, while primary support rests at $2,050. The $2,100 level acts as a pivot point with high trading volume. A sustained break above resistance or below support would signal a new directional trend. Q4: How does risk sentiment affect gold prices? Positive risk sentiment typically reduces gold’s appeal as investors favor higher-yielding assets like stocks. This relationship shows in statistical correlations, with gold’s correlation to major equity indices becoming less negative recently, explaining why stock market strength limits gold gains. Q5: What would trigger a sustained gold breakout above current resistance? A combination of factors including: weaker-than-expected US economic data prompting Fed dovishness, renewed geopolitical tensions enhancing safe-haven demand, significant dollar depreciation, or a sharp reversal in equity markets that shifts capital toward defensive assets. This post Gold Price Analysis Reveals Critical Stalemate as Upbeat Risk Tone Battles Weaker Dollar Ahead of Pivotal US Jobs Report first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
Capital is exiting, and panic may already be priced in.
Legal experts say civil claims offer Bithumb the clearest route to recovering Bitcoin mistakenly distributed in a $43 billion error.
Bitcoin struggles to maintain the $67,000 level, causing investor anxiety. Social media sentiment turns negative, with fear dictating market narratives. Continue Reading: Bitcoin’s Struggles Shake Investor Confidence as Fear Dominates The post Bitcoin’s Struggles Shake Investor Confidence as Fear Dominates appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .