Solana outperforms Web3 and Web2 platforms in payment volume with 755% growth year

  vor 9 Monaten

Solana network has experienced explosive growth in payment volume, outpacing both Web3 and Web2 platforms. The network’s payment volume grew 755% year on year, according to Artemis data. The Solana network is currently leading all payment platforms across Web2 and Web3 in total payment volume. According to data from onchain data provider Artemis, Solana’s payment processing volume grew 755% year over year across all platforms, with total payment volume exceeding $1.8 billion. Solana Network’s B2B payment volume rises by 9X in 16 months, onchain data shows Solana leads payments growth across all platforms, at +755% YoY. While blockchains are winning growth (+755% on $6.5B), TradFi still owns volume (PayPal processes $1.8T). https://t.co/9bW2qfzIlA pic.twitter.com/k0BlKxdckJ — Artemis (@artemis) February 11, 2026 In comparison, Artemis data showed that stablecoin payment volume increased by over 137% year over year as of August 2025, with B2B accounting for the largest share across all stablecoins. The data also shows that Solana’s B2B payment volume grew by 9X to $3.84 billion in just 16 months. Solana Network has also witnessed massive growth in spot trading volume. A previous report by Cryptopolitan, dated January 5, highlighted that the network recorded $1.6 trillion in spot trading volume in 2025, outpacing major crypto exchanges. Solana’s trading volume accounted for 11.92% of the global spot market according to onchain data. The network’s spot volume ranked it only behind Binance, which led the pack with $7.2 trillion. According to onchain data , Solana outperformed major crypto exchanges such as Bybit, Coinbase, and Bitget in 2025. Data from the open-source DeFi data aggregator DefiLlama shows that SOL’s monthly volume on decentralized exchanges outperformed major rivals such as Ethereum and BSC in most of 2025, peaking in January 2025 at $313.91 billion. In the same month, Ethereum followed in second place with a total trading volume of $85.692 billion, while Base ranked third with $50 billion. Solana ended the year with total trading volume exceeding $1.5 trillion, while Ethereum clocked $950 billion. SOL price dips, sending treasury firms tumbling However, SOL has had a rough start to the year amid the ongoing crypto winter. The crypto asset is down 9% over the last 7 days, according to CoinMarketCap data. SOL has declined by more than 35% year to date and is trading at $82.38 at the time of this publication. The price decline has had a devastating impact on SOL treasury firms. Cryptopolitan recently reported that Solana treasury firms have seen their holdings decline after SOL fell nearly 40% over the last 30 days. According to data from Coingecko, Forward Industries currently ranks first with 6.9 million Solana in its books, valued at $564.38 million. In comparison, Solana Company claims the second spot with 2.3 million SOL, valued at $187.8 million. The report noted that SOL’s price mirrored the massive liquidations that occurred on Friday, wiping out more than $300 million in long positions. Spot SOL ETFs have recorded net outflows of more than $10 million so far in February. Data from Sosovalue shows that these funds recorded inflows worth $478.90k on Wednesday after drawing $8.43 million from investors the previous day. The funds currently hold $673.99 million in net assets under management, which accounts for 1.49% of the crypto asset’s total market capitalization. Solana’s daily validator count has fallen to its lowest level since 2021, below 800. The figures mark a significant decline from the network’s peak validator count of 2,500 recorded in early 2023. The decline in validator count could be a deliberate effort by the Solana Foundation, according to a previous Cryptopolitan coverage . The report noted that the foundation implemented a deliberate behind-the-scenes restructuring to reshape validator conditions and requirements. The pruning phase led the Solana Foundation to offload many underperforming nodes amid efforts to improve the network’s quality and reliability. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

Weiterlesen

Turkey Central Bank Defies Soaring Inflation with Persistent Easing Bias – A Critical 2025 Analysis

  vor 9 Monaten

BitcoinWorld Turkey Central Bank Defies Soaring Inflation with Persistent Easing Bias – A Critical 2025 Analysis In Ankara, Turkey, the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) continues to signal a commitment to monetary easing, a policy stance that financial analysts at ING highlight as increasingly contentious against a backdrop of revised and rising inflation forecasts for 2025. This persistent easing bias presents a complex challenge for policymakers balancing growth objectives with price stability. Turkey Central Bank Maintains Course Amidst Economic Crosswinds The CBRT’s current policy direction emphasizes supporting economic growth and employment. Consequently, the bank has maintained a cycle of interest rate reductions. However, recent data and projections complicate this narrative. Official inflation readings have consistently exceeded targets, prompting institutions like ING to revise their year-end forecasts upward. This creates a tangible tension between the bank’s stated easing bias and the accelerating pace of consumer price increases. Economists point to several structural factors fueling inflation. Firstly, currency depreciation exerts significant pressure. The Turkish lira has faced volatility, increasing the cost of imported goods and raw materials. Secondly, persistent supply-side constraints and rising global energy costs contribute to core inflation. Finally, robust domestic demand, partly fueled by earlier expansive fiscal policies, adds to price pressures. The central bank’s challenge, therefore, is multifaceted. Deciphering the Inflation Forecast Revisions Financial institutions globally recalibrate their economic models regularly. ING’s recent adjustment of Turkey’s inflation forecast reflects this ongoing analysis. Their revised outlook incorporates several real-world data points from the first quarter of 2025. These include monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) reports, currency exchange rate trajectories, and commodity price shifts. The forecast revision is not merely speculative; it is evidence-based, drawing from verifiable public data published by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). For context, consider the following comparison of recent inflation trends and policy rates: Period Annual CPI Inflation Policy Rate (CBRT) Primary Driver Q4 2024 High Single-Digits Significantly Reduced Lira Depreciation Q1 2025 Revised Upward Maintained Low Combined Demand & Cost-Push Projected Q4 2025 Above Official Target Subject to Debate Policy Credibility This data illustrates the widening gap between price growth and the cost of borrowing. Maintaining an easing bias in this environment signals a prioritization of other economic indicators over immediate inflation containment. Analysts scrutinize this approach for its long-term sustainability. The Credibility and Communication Challenge Central banking relies heavily on market trust and forward guidance. When inflation forecasts rise consistently, the credibility of a dovish policy stance faces tests. Market participants and international investors monitor the alignment between central bank rhetoric and economic reality. A persistent easing bias amidst climbing inflation can lead to several outcomes: Currency Pressure: It may exacerbate lira weakness, creating a feedback loop for inflation. Capital Flows: It could deter foreign investment seeking stable real returns. Inflation Expectations: It risks de-anchoring public and business expectations, making future disinflation more costly. Therefore, the CBRT’s communication strategy becomes as critical as its rate decisions. Each policy statement is parsed for hints of a pivot or reaffirmation. The bank must manage expectations while navigating political and social imperatives for growth. Global Context and Domestic Realities Turkey’s monetary policy dilemma does not exist in a vacuum. Many emerging markets grapple with similar trade-offs between growth and stability. However, Turkey’s situation is distinct due to its specific geopolitical position, energy dependency, and the unique structure of its economy. The CBRT’s actions are compared with peers like Brazil or Mexico, which have often taken more aggressive stance against inflation. Domestically, the policy impacts everyday citizens profoundly. High inflation erodes purchasing power, particularly for fixed-income households. Conversely, very high interest rates can stifle business investment and increase unemployment. The central bank’s easing bias, therefore, aims to stimulate credit and economic activity. Yet, if it fuels inflation further, it may ultimately hurt the very consumers it intends to support. This is the delicate balancing act at the heart of modern monetary policy. Expert Analysis and Forward-Looking Scenarios Institutions like ING provide scenario-based analysis. A baseline scenario might assume the CBRT maintains its course with minor adjustments, leading to a gradual moderation of inflation through administrative measures and base effects. A more cautious scenario involves a sudden policy shift if lira depreciation accelerates dramatically or inflation spikes beyond a critical threshold. The timing of any potential pivot is a key subject of market speculation. Evidence from past cycles shows that delayed responses to inflation often require more severe corrective measures later. Historical data from Turkey’s own economic history underscores this pattern. Consequently, analysts watch for subtle shifts in the CBRT’s monthly reports or meeting minutes—changes in phrasing regarding inflation risks or the future policy path can signal important directional changes before any actual rate move. Conclusion The Turkey central bank’s decision to maintain an easing bias while inflation forecasts rise defines a critical juncture for the nation’s economy in 2025. This policy stance, analyzed in depth by experts at ING, reflects a complex calculation between stimulating growth and controlling prices. The evolving situation underscores the challenges of monetary management in an emerging market facing global headwinds and domestic pressures. The path forward for the Turkish lira and overall economic stability hinges on the CBRT’s ability to navigate this tension, adapt to incoming data, and maintain its credibility in the eyes of both international markets and the Turkish public. FAQs Q1: What does “easing bias” mean for a central bank? An easing bias indicates that a central bank’s stated policy inclination is toward making monetary conditions looser, typically by lowering interest rates or using other tools to increase money supply and encourage borrowing and spending. Q2: Why are ING’s inflation forecast revisions important? Forecast revisions from major financial institutions like ING are important because they influence global investor sentiment, affect currency markets, and provide an independent assessment that can contrast with official projections, offering a more complete market picture. Q3: How does a weak Turkish lira contribute to inflation? A weaker lira increases the cost in local currency of all imported goods, including essential items like energy, raw materials, and machinery. These higher costs are often passed on to consumers, raising overall price levels in the economy. Q4: Can a central bank focus on growth and ignore high inflation? While possible in the short term, persistently high inflation typically undermines sustainable growth by creating uncertainty, distorting investment decisions, and eroding consumer purchasing power. Most central banks view price stability as a prerequisite for long-term economic growth. Q5: What tools does the CBRT have besides interest rates? The CBRT can use reserve requirements for banks, liquidity management operations, foreign exchange interventions, and macroprudential measures (like loan-to-value limits) to influence credit conditions and financial stability without directly changing the policy rate. This post Turkey Central Bank Defies Soaring Inflation with Persistent Easing Bias – A Critical 2025 Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Weiterlesen

Spot crypto trading on crypto exchanges see 10% boost in January

  vor 9 Monaten

Spot crypto trading on centralized and decentralized exchanges expanded in January. Binance was once again the leading market, boosting the growth to 10% compared to December 2025. Spot crypto trading on centralized exchanges remains active, even after the drawdown of leveraged liquidity. On average, activity expanded by 10% in January, compared with December 2025. The top growth was noted on Uniswap , up by 84%. Bitfinex added 70% to its volumes, and Upbit expanded its activity by 44%. The biggest outflows happened on HTX, down 19%, and Bybit, down 16%. KuCoin lost 7% of its January volume. Derivative crypto trading slowed down in January The crypto market still has sufficient liquidity, though concentrated into BTC and ETH, as Cryptopolitan reported . The crypto space has a record supply of stablecoins capable of ensuring active spot trading. Derivative activity has lost its momentum, meaning exchanges operate with lower leverage. In January 2026, derivatives trading volumes declined by 5% on average. MEXC led the decline, down 36%, followed by Aster (down 24%). Coinbase showed an increase of 49% for derivatives, while Hyperliquid recovered 19% of its volumes. Binance remained the top spot and derivative exchange, up by 12.5% for spot trading activity. However, Binance only saw a 0.7% increase for its derivative trading, reflecting the cautious market sentiment. Trading data may be inaccurate by including bot-driven orders and wash trading. Web traffic to exchanges remained mostly unchanged, though South Korean markets like Upbit and KuCoin saw increased visits. MEXC continued to slow down, losing 8% of its site visits. Traders searched for short-term resolution Crypto trading in January saw an uptick in volumes, while most assets took a downturn. For some DEXs and markets, activity reached peak levels, as traders divested their positions. A part of the volume expansion was due to selling, as well as some spot accumulation. Without a clear directional move and greed sentiment, the current spot-driven market may mean a period of sideways trading for major assets. DEXs retained a relatively high share of 16.9% of centralized activity. Those markets were also more widely used by retail and for meme token trading. Centralized market orders also diminished in size. The size of spot orders declined in January, while smaller whales and retail reappeared in February. | Source: Cryptoquant In the past weeks, retail orders returned, alongside orders from smaller whales. Larger whales continued with silent accumulation, but did not add to active daily trading volumes. While the market moves sideways, smaller wallets were noticed buying back BTC, as well as ETH, while whales continued to sell. Crypto trades with peak uncertainty and higher volatility, as questions were raised on whether BTC could go lower in an extended bear market. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Weiterlesen

Shiba Inu (SHIB) Plunges by 20% in 2 Weeks: Another 80% Crash Comes Next?

  vor 9 Monaten

Shiba Inu (SHIB) has lately been a pale shadow of its former self, with its valuation tumbling by double digits in a matter of weeks. According to some analysts, the bad days for the bulls might be just starting. Devastating Crash Ahead? As of press time, SHIB trades at around $0.000006127, representing a 20% decline on a 14-day scale. Its market cap slipped to around $3.6 billion, making it the 30th-biggest cryptocurrency. Recall that it ranked much higher in the spring of last year when the capitalization neared $10 billion. One popular analyst who touched upon the meme coin’s downfall is Ali Martinez. He claimed that the recent drop below $0.00000667 could have opened the door to a much deeper collapse to as low as $0.00000138. Such a move south would represent a whopping 77% crash from current levels. Several key indicators also suggest that SHIB’s price could be headed for a further plunge. Over the past 24 hours, the Shiba Inu team and community have burned a negligible 483 coins, representing a 99% decline from yesterday’s figure. The ultimate goal of the mechanism, adopted in 2022, is to reduce the meme coin’s overall supply, potentially making it more valuable in time (assuming demand remains constant or heads north). Data shows that the current circulating supply is roughly 585.46 trillion tokens after more than 410.7 trillion SHIB have been scorched over the years. SHIB Supply, Source: shibburn.com Meanwhile, Shibburn – the X account spreading information about the recent token burns – has been inactive lately. The last update on the matter, from January 9, showed that the daily and weekly burn rates have been unimpressive. Shiba Inu’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) supports the bearish scenario. Over the past few hours, the metric’s ratio exceeded 70, indicating the asset is overbought and could be gearing up for a pullback. The technical analysis tool ranges from 0 to 100, where readings between 30 and 70 are considered neutral, whereas anything below 30 may be viewed as a buying opportunity. SHIB RSI, Source: RSI Hunter Can the Bulls Return? Contrary to Martinez’s grim prediction, the analyst who goes by the X moniker Vuori Trading argued that SHIB may explode in the foreseeable future. They claimed that the asset remains in the “bear trap” stage, characterizing the setup as “pure manipulation before shooting higher.” The analyst set a target of “at least” $0.00014, which would be an all-time high and represent a staggering 2,200% increase from the ongoing valuation. Despite the recent price plunge, SHIB investors don’t appear to be rushing to sell. In fact, CryptoQuant’s data shows that the number of coins stored on exchanges has declined over the past month. This trend signals a shift toward self-custody and reduces immediate selling pressure. SHIB Exchange Reserves, Source: CryptoQuant The post Shiba Inu (SHIB) Plunges by 20% in 2 Weeks: Another 80% Crash Comes Next? appeared first on CryptoPotato .

Weiterlesen

Weekly Jobless Claims Surge to 227K, Sparking Crucial Federal Reserve Policy Debate

  vor 9 Monaten

BitcoinWorld Weekly Jobless Claims Surge to 227K, Sparking Crucial Federal Reserve Policy Debate WASHINGTON, D.C. — February 13, 2025. The latest U.S. labor market data delivered a significant signal this week, as weekly jobless claims climbed to 227,000 for the period ending February 7th. This figure notably surpassed economist forecasts of 222,000, injecting fresh uncertainty into the Federal Reserve’s ongoing battle to balance inflation control with economic stability. The increase marks the highest level in over a month and provides a critical, real-time snapshot of American economic resilience as policymakers chart their course for the remainder of the year. Weekly Jobless Claims Analysis and Immediate Market Impact Released every Thursday by the Department of Labor, the initial jobless claims report serves as a high-frequency pulse check on the nation’s economic health. The rise to 227,000 represents an increase of approximately 12,000 from the prior week’s revised figure. Consequently, financial markets reacted with immediate sensitivity. Treasury yields dipped slightly as investors priced in a marginally higher probability of future Federal Reserve interest rates cuts. Meanwhile, equity markets exhibited mixed reactions, reflecting the complex interplay between cooling labor data and corporate earnings expectations. This specific report covers the first full week of February, a period often scrutinized for post-holiday employment adjustments. Historically, claims tend to normalize during this timeframe after seasonal volatility. Therefore, the above-forecast reading carries added weight for analysts seeking to discern underlying trends from temporary noise. The four-week moving average, a more stable metric favored by economists, also edged higher, suggesting the single-week increase may reflect a developing pattern rather than a statistical anomaly. Recent Weekly Jobless Claims Trend (January – February 2025) Week Ending Jobless Claims Forecast Variance Jan 10 218,000 220,000 -2,000 Jan 17 215,000 218,000 -3,000 Jan 24 221,000 219,000 +2,000 Jan 31 215,000 220,000 -5,000 Feb 7 227,000 222,000 +5,000 The Federal Reserve’s Delicate Balancing Act in 2025 The US labor market remains the central pillar in the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability. For over a year, the Fed has maintained a restrictive monetary policy stance, holding the federal funds rate at a multi-decade high to combat persistent inflation. However, officials have repeatedly stated their decisions remain “data-dependent,” with employment figures carrying paramount importance. A sustained increase in unemployment claims could signal the first meaningful softening in a remarkably tight job market, potentially giving the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) the confidence to consider pivoting toward rate cuts without reigniting inflationary pressures. Conversely, a single week of data rarely dictates policy. The Fed closely monitors a suite of indicators, including: Non-farm payrolls and the unemployment rate Job openings (JOLTS report) and quit rates Wage growth metrics, particularly the Employment Cost Index Productivity and unit labor costs Therefore, while the claims data provides a timely input, policymakers will seek confirmation from these broader datasets before making any significant shift. The upcoming February jobs report, due in early March, now carries even greater significance for setting the monetary policy tone for the spring. Expert Analysis on Labor Market Cooling Signals Economists from major financial institutions have begun to weigh in on the implications. “The claims data is a canary in the coal mine,” noted Dr. Anya Sharma, Chief Economist at the Brookings Institution. “While one week does not make a trend, crossing above the 225,000 threshold is psychologically important. It suggests the cumulative effect of high interest rates and slowing demand is finally permeating the labor market’s defensive armor.” Dr. Sharma emphasizes that the Fed will look for consistency, wanting to see if claims stabilize at this higher level or continue to drift upward. Meanwhile, analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDPNow model suggests that first-quarter economic growth projections may see slight downward revisions following this data. The connection is direct: more claims can lead to reduced consumer spending, which accounts for nearly 70% of U.S. economic activity. This creates a feedback loop where softening labor conditions can dampen economic growth, which in turn may lead to further labor market softening—a cycle the Fed aims to manage carefully. Historical Context and Sector-Specific Pressures To fully understand the 227,000 figure, historical context is essential. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, weekly claims soared into the millions. The subsequent recovery saw claims plummet to historic lows, consistently below 200,000 for much of 2022 and 2023, illustrating an exceptionally tight labor market. The current level, while elevated relative to those lows, remains below the historical average of approximately 350,000 claims seen in the decade preceding the pandemic. This indicates a labor market that is potentially normalizing rather than collapsing. Digging deeper, sector-specific data reveals where pressures are mounting. Continuing claims, which measure the total number of people already receiving unemployment benefits, have also shown a gradual uptrend. This suggests that individuals who lose their jobs are finding it slightly more difficult to secure new employment quickly. Industries sensitive to interest rates, such as technology, finance, and real estate, have shown higher levels of layoff announcements in recent months. In contrast, sectors like healthcare, hospitality, and government have demonstrated more resilience, highlighting the uneven nature of the current economic transition. Broader Economic Indicators and the Inflation Outlook The jobless claims report does not exist in a vacuum. It interacts dynamically with other key economic releases. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index—the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge—have shown gradual but uneven progress toward the central bank’s 2% target. A moderating labor market could help ease wage-driven inflationary pressures, often called “wage-price spiral” risks. However, if labor costs remain elevated due to persistent worker shortages in key sectors, the Fed’s path becomes more complicated. Furthermore, global economic conditions play a role. Slowing growth in Europe and China affects U.S. export demand, which can influence domestic hiring decisions. Geopolitical tensions continue to disrupt supply chains, contributing to input cost volatility. The Federal Reserve must synthesize this complex global and domestic data mosaic. Each piece, including the weekly claims report, helps complete the picture of an economy in transition from a period of overheated growth to a more sustainable, stable expansion. Conclusion The rise in weekly jobless claims to 227,000 serves as a pivotal data point in the 2025 economic narrative. It provides tangible evidence that the historically tight U.S. labor market may be entering a phase of moderation. For the Federal Reserve , this data supports the patient, observant stance communicated in recent FOMC statements. While not decisive on its own, a continuation of this trend would significantly increase the likelihood of a policy pivot toward interest rate cuts in the latter half of the year. Ultimately, the health of the US labor market remains the cornerstone of both economic prosperity and monetary policy, making each week’s claims report a critical chapter in an ongoing story of economic rebalancing. FAQs Q1: What are weekly jobless claims and why are they important? A1: Weekly jobless claims, or initial unemployment claims, represent the number of individuals who filed for unemployment benefits for the first time during a given week. They are a leading, high-frequency indicator of labor market health. A rising trend suggests increasing layoffs and potential economic softening, while a falling trend indicates strength. Q2: How does this data directly influence Federal Reserve interest rate decisions? A2: The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate: maximum employment and stable prices. Strong jobless claims data (low numbers) suggest a tight labor market, which can fuel wage growth and inflation, potentially justifying higher interest rates. Weak data (high numbers) suggests cooling, which can reduce inflationary pressure and open the door for rate cuts to support the economy. Q3: Is one week of higher-than-expected claims data a cause for significant concern? A3: Not necessarily. Weekly data is volatile and can be influenced by holidays, weather, or administrative backlogs. Economists and the Fed focus on the four-week moving average and longer-term trends. A single data point is a signal to watch closely, but it requires confirmation from subsequent reports and other labor market indicators. Q4: What other economic reports should I watch alongside jobless claims? A4: Key complementary reports include the monthly Employment Situation Report (non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate), the JOLTS report (job openings and labor turnover), the Employment Cost Index (wage growth), and inflation reports (CPI and PCE). Together, these provide a comprehensive view of labor market conditions. Q5: What does a “cooling” labor market mean for the average person? A5: For job seekers, a cooling market may mean slightly fewer openings and less leverage in salary negotiations. For employed individuals, it may reduce the likelihood of rapid wage gains but also signal lower inflation and potentially lower interest rates on loans in the future. For the overall economy, it represents a shift from overheated, inflationary growth toward more sustainable, stable expansion. This post Weekly Jobless Claims Surge to 227K, Sparking Crucial Federal Reserve Policy Debate first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Weiterlesen

WGMI: High Correlation To Bitcoin, Significant Downside Remaining

  vor 9 Monaten

Summary The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF offers pure-play exposure to North America's leading Bitcoin mining companies, crucial for blockchain transaction verification. WGMI is highly concentrated, with over 82% in its top ten holdings, notably Cipher Mining and IREN Ltd. The ETF exhibits high beta and volatility, with a standard deviation of 85% and annualized volatility of 80%, closely tracking Bitcoin price movements. Recent correlation to Bitcoin has decreased to 63%, but WGMI remains sensitive to further downside in the crypto market. Thesis The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF ( WGMI ) is an equities exchange-traded fund. In particular, the ETF aims to: Gain pure-play access to North America's leading Bitcoin mining industry, a crucial component of the Bitcoin ecosystem. WGMI provides targeted exposure to the companies at the forefront of transaction verification, ensuring transparency and security on the blockchain. The ETF is dedicated to companies in the bitcoin mining industry and comes with a high beta to the S&P 500. Given the recent volatility in bitcoin and downward momentum for the crypto universe, we are going to take a closer look at this fund and its outlook in today's macro. Fund composition Let us start by looking at the holdings in this ETF: Holdings (ETF website / Author) The above table has been extracted by the author from the list present on the ETF's website . Note that the top ten holdings make up over 82% of the ETF, with a large concentration in Cipher Mining ( CIFR ) and IREN Ltd. ( IREN ). The fund is actively managed, with a reported 40% portfolio turnover; however, do note the universe of crypto miners is fairly limited. Before we take a close look at the balance sheets and income statements of some of the largest exposures here, let us establish the correlation to bitcoin for this ETF. Correlation to Bitcoin Let us look a little closer at how the ETF does versus an outright play on bitcoin via the largest ETF in the space, namely the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF ( IBIT ): Correlations (testfol.io) It is interesting to notice the very high correlation of 70% during 2025, a correlation that has now moved down to 63%. While the correlation has diminished, the high-beta nature of the ETF is nonetheless there: Data by YCharts In the past three months, the S&P 500 ( SPX ) via its SPY ETF proxy is up 1.57%. Conversely, WGMI is down -20%, while bitcoin is down -35%. WGMI has a very high standard deviation and volatility, with the following metrics extracted from the Seeking Alpha ' Risk ' tab: Volatility (Seeking Alpha) The standard deviation is an astounding 85%, while the annualized volatility is 80%. While as of late the correlation to bitcoin has diminished, the fund beta and volatility are still very high and generally follow the bitcoin movement. If there is further downside in bitcoin, there is also substantial downside left in WGMI. Some financials and a potential transformation Let us look now at some financials for CIFR and IREN to better understand their revenue streams and profitability. Let us start with the CIFR balance sheet: CIFR Balance Sheet (SEC Financials) As of the latest financials posted to the SEC website, we can see the company running a high outright balance of roughly $170M in bitcoin, up from the prior year. A significant decrease in bitcoin prices would result in a lower asset value, thus a direct hit to income (unrealized, just like with Strategy). The CIFR income statement looks as follows: Income Statement (SEC Financials) For the nine months ending September 2025, the company's only source of revenue was bitcoin mining, which brought in $164M, but not enough to generate a positive net income given the cost structure. In fact, Cipher has never posted a positive operating income figure: Operating Income per Year (Seeking Alpha) However, the company is trying to change this by adjusting its long-term business model. Recently, the company has signed a deal with Amazon to provide data center computing power: Cipher Mining is shifting its focus from pure bitcoin mining to AI enabled data center infrastructure. The company has entered a 15-year lease agreement with Amazon, positioning its facilities for long term data center services. While this is a positive long-term, we are yet to see that cash flow hit the revenue line in the income statement and make a difference. Bitcoin is still the dominant force both on the asset side and on the income side. Now let us take a look at IREN. The balance sheet looks as follows: Balance Sheet (SEC Filings) IREN has a much larger balance sheet, with no bitcoin on the asset side as per the disclosures above. IREN is actually known for selling its bitcoin as it gains it, making it more of a pure miner rather than an accumulator of the cryptocurrency. The income statement for IREN is also different: IREN Income Statement (SEC Filing) IREN has a large revenue stream from bitcoin mining but also an AI cloud services revenue stream. Cloud is only 10% of the revenue stream as of the last quarter, but it is increasing. When looking historically, we can also see that IREN was operationally profitable just one year during its life as a company: Historic Operating Income (Seeking Alpha) The only time the company was profitable operationally was for the fiscal year ending June 2025, which coincides with the top in bitcoin prices. IREN has also signed a deal with one of the Magnificent 7 in terms of providing cloud infrastructure services: IREN Limited (NASDAQ: IREN) announced a multi-year agreement with Microsoft valued at approximately $9.7 billion to deliver GPU cloud infrastructure powered by NVIDIA GB300 GPUs. The partnership represents one of the largest AI infrastructure deployments announced this year and reflects the growing demand for high-performance compute. Under the agreement, IREN will deliver large scale GPU clusters accommodated within IREN’s liquid cooled data centers under construction at its 750 MW campus located in Childress, Texas. The GPUs will be deployed in 4 phases through 2026 (Horizon 1-4) and will collectively provide 200MW of critical IT load. The five-year contract includes a 20 percent prepayment and is expected to contribute roughly $1.94 billion in annualized run rate revenue once fully commissioned. While it is clear that IREN is diversifying, the operational income picture is not quite there yet in terms of seeing cloud revenues exceed the bitcoin mining ones. Bitcoin technical take There are two large bearish technical patterns forming on bitcoin: Bearish Flag From a technical standpoint, bitcoin is forming a bearish flag pattern: A bearish flag is a technical chart pattern signaling a brief pause in a strong downtrend, suggesting the downward trend will likely continue, acting as a continuation pattern where a sharp price drop (flagpole) is followed by a small, upward-sloping consolidation channel (the flag) with decreasing volume, before breaking lower again. A visual representation of a bearish flag pattern is as follows: Bear Flag (Technical Analysis) Now, let us take a look at what Bitcoin has been doing: Bear Flag Bitcoin (TrendSpider) While not every reader might be a fan of technical analysis, patterns usually are correct, especially when they present such a 'clean' take on a theoretical graph. Head and shoulders This is another technical trading pattern that can be 'seen' on the bitcoin charts: The Head & Shoulders pattern is a key chart formation in technical analysis that signals a potential market reversal from an uptrend to a downtrend. It consists of three peaks: a higher middle peak (the "head") flanked by two lower peaks (the "shoulders") and a support line called the "neckline." From a visual standpoint, the head-and-shoulders pattern looks like this: H-n-S Pattern (Corporate Finance Institute) The pattern is a bearish one, with most analysts anticipating a decline equal to the change from the neckline to the top. So if the security experienced a +20% gain from the neckline to the top of the head-and-shoulders pattern, then a forecasted -20% loss is penciled in when the neckline is broken. Currently the bitcoin chart looks as follows: Bitcoin price (Seeking Alpha) In our view, now that the $75,000 level neckline is broken, the bearish pattern is fully validated. On the downside, some analysts use the difference between the neckline and the top as a downside target. Conclusion WGMI is an equities ETF. The name aggregates bitcoin miners in an active portfolio, and its top ten holdings represent over 80% of the fund exposure. IREN and CIFR are currently 20% of the fund each, and the article discusses their income statement and balance sheets. WGMI is highly correlated to bitcoin and is set to follow the cryptocurrency lower, even as the underlying companies are trying to diversify away. We are a 'Sell' for this name, which will continue to follow bitcoin lower.

Weiterlesen

E-Estate Group Inc. tokenizes $100M in real estate as tokenization market heats up

  vor 9 Monaten

E-Estate Group Inc. has announced that it has tokenized more than $100 million worth of premium property assets, marking an early milestone for the digital real estate platform as the broader tokenization market continues to gain momentum. E-Estate’s 2025 annual report puts the platform’s tokenized real estate portfolio value at $104.62 million by year-end, spanning 11 tokenized property projects across multiple jurisdictions. The company also reported 2,039,787 EST tokens sold out of 10,462,000 issued, indicating roughly 19.5% distribution across the active portfolio. Beyond the year-end snapshot, E-Estate’s report states the portfolio’s “actual value” stood at $152.32 million as of January 1, 2026, up from $104.62 million, with the change attributed to real asset appreciation and development-stage progress, particularly in Dubai-linked projects. Real estate portfolio value growth. Source: E-Estate Group Inc Tokenization strategy and early expansion The firm was officially registered in Panama in November 2024 and later secured an international Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), positioning itself within recognized compliance frameworks. It also confirmed that its native Estate Token (EST) has been verified on the Binance Smart Chain , aligning the platform with established blockchain infrastructure. E-Estate says its model focuses on fractional ownership, allowing investors to gain exposure to traditionally illiquid real estate assets through blockchain-based token issuance. By converting property value into digital tokens, the platform aims to streamline cross-border access, improve liquidity, and lower capital barriers that have historically limited participation in premium real estate markets. The $100 million figure reflects the cumulative value of tokenized properties onboarded to date, according to the company’s disclosures. Broader roadmap through 2034 Beyond its initial portfolio, E-Estate’s roadmap outlines plans for global expansion, additional asset categories, and deeper institutional integration over the coming years. In 2026, the company intends to host a Miami Summit aimed at attracting investors and agents from over 30 countries, while also expanding into new property classes including apartments and villas. Longer-term goals include quarterly financial reporting, expansion into the U.S. and European regulatory jurisdictions, and the potential issuance of corporate shares under a hybrid equity-token structure. The roadmap also references preparations for a future listing on major stock exchanges, including Nasdaq and European markets, though no timeline has been formally confirmed. Tokenization market gains traction E-Estate’s announcement comes amid growing interest in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, a sector that seeks to bring traditional financial and physical assets onto blockchain networks. Industry observers have noted increasing institutional experimentation with tokenized bonds, funds, and real estate, driven by the promise of improved transparency, programmability, and settlement efficiency. Real estate, in particular, has emerged as one of the most discussed use cases due to its high capital requirements and historically low liquidity. While the sector remains in its early stages, platforms such as E-Estate are positioning themselves to capture demand from both retail and cross-border investors seeking fractional exposure to global property markets. The post E-Estate Group Inc. tokenizes $100M in real estate as tokenization market heats up appeared first on Finbold .

Weiterlesen

Russia extends firewall to limits amid censorship of Telegram, WhatsApp, and YouTube

  vor 9 Monaten

The full blocking of WhatsApp in Russia is linked to the nation’s firewall running out of capacity amid attempts to slow down Telegram, experts in the field suggest. Besides the two messengers, Russian authorities are also cutting traffic to YouTube, overloading the technology employed by the state to censor internet for its citizens. Russia extends itself to block massive online content and communication The sudden and complete restriction of access to the popular messenger WhatsApp and YouTube in Russia is likely related to efforts to slow down Telegram, local media unveiled, quoting specialists with knowledge of how the system works. Russia’s telecom watchdog, Roskomnadzor, removed the WhatsApp domain from its DNS servers on Wednesday, effectively preventing the use of Meta’s messaging service in the country. It appears it did that also with Google’s video sharing platform a day earlier. The domains have been deleted from the National Domain Name System (NDNS), established after the adoption of the so-called “sovereign internet” law. Under the legislation, the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor) is responsible for enforcing the Russian equivalent to the Chinese framework for internet control. The strategy is the same in both case, so is the reason which is of technical nature, according to Dzhemali Avalishvili, managing director of the infrastructure integrator Ultimatek, who commented on the latest developments for RBC. Quoted by the Russian business news portal, Avalishvili explained further: “There’s only one reason, and it’s technical – the TSPU equipment is operating at the limit of its capacity.” The TSPU (Technical Means of Counteracting Threats) devices are deployed at internet service providers to allow them to throttle or block internet traffic to targeted platforms. In comparison with China’s “Great Firewall,” which operates on a national level, Russia’s solution allows for more precise, highly targeted and geographically defined restricting. However, the Russian system isn’t built to last, Avalishvili pointed out, and is running out of resources now when it has to deal with multiple and widely used platforms. He elaborated: “The infrastructure simply can’t handle simultaneously squashing YouTube, Telegram, and WhatsApp. It’s like trying to run three heavy apps on an old laptop.” Targeting Telegram is harder and requires resources that Russia doesn’t have Slowing down Telegram is much harder than in the case of all of the other affected services and websites, the expert emphasized. He highlighted that tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov’s messenger has stronger security and more experience with previous attempts to block it in other countries. Avalishvili added that Telegram’s unique architecture relies on a distributed infrastructure of mirrors and content delivery networks (CDNs). “Its encryption protocol is designed to make deep packet inspection (DPI) as difficult as possible. To slow down Telegram, you need to deploy colossal computing power,” he detailed. The privacy-oriented messenger has tens of millions of users in Russia, and not only among citizens and businesses, but also government institutions and other organizations. Almost everyone in the country has the messenger installed on their smartphones, logging in several times a day to read and write, chimed in Alexey Uchakin, an independent telecom market specialist. “This represents a huge amount of traffic and a huge number of connections from end-user devices to Telegram servers. The messenger has learned to bypass many standard blocking mechanisms.” While WhatsApp used to be more popular in the Russian Federation, it never significantly modernized its infrastructure to successfully circumvent Moscow’s restrictions, he noted, agreeing that blocking Telegram is definitely harder. He is convinced that Roskomnadzor is removing the domains of previously restricted services to “clear up resources to slow down Telegram.” In a broad interview with the official TASS news agency, the Kremlin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted that the messenger must comply with Russia’s laws and ensure protection for its citizens, before the restrictions are removed, although some say Moscow has already made up its mind about its future. President Putin’s press secretary set similar conditions for resuming WhatsApp’s full services in Russia, where its parent company, Facebook’s owner Meta, has been designated as an “extremist” organization. He accused the latter of lacking the willingness to engage in dialogue with Russian authorities on the matter. Roskmonadzor limited voice calls through both apps in August, alleging they were increasingly being used by fraudsters and extremists. The measures against them seem to be part of a campaign to make Russians use a state-approved alternative called Max , which critics say can be used for surveillance and censorship. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

Weiterlesen

Copyright © 2026 Aktuelle Krypto Kurse. - Impressum