Shiba Inu is seeing some serious outflows, but it might not be enough to ease up the pressure.
On-chain activity metrics reveal whether adoption is functional or speculative.
BitcoinWorld Airbnb AI Features: The Revolutionary Shift to Personalized, Conversational Travel Planning In a strategic move set to redefine digital travel, Airbnb has unveiled plans to deeply integrate artificial intelligence across its platform, fundamentally shifting from simple search to an intuitive, conversational, and deeply personalized journey for guests and hosts alike. Announced by CEO Brian Chesky during the company’s Q4 2024 earnings call, this initiative marks Airbnb’s most significant technological evolution since its inception, aiming to create an “AI-native” experience that understands user preferences and anticipates needs throughout the entire trip lifecycle. This development arrives as the travel industry increasingly leverages generative AI to enhance discovery and operational efficiency, positioning Airbnb to compete not just on listings, but on intelligent service. Airbnb AI Features: Building an “AI-Native” Travel Experience Brian Chesky articulated a clear vision: transforming the Airbnb app into a proactive travel companion. “We are building an AI-native experience where the app does not just search for you. It knows you,” Chesky stated. This represents a fundamental departure from traditional keyword-based filters. The planned Airbnb AI features will utilize large language models (LLMs) to assist guests with holistic trip planning—suggesting not only accommodations but also activities, dining, and logistics based on past behavior, stated preferences, and even conversational cues. For hosts, the AI will function as a business management co-pilot, offering insights on pricing, guest communication, and property upkeep. This dual approach aims to enhance value for both sides of the marketplace simultaneously, thereby strengthening the entire ecosystem. The Core Pillars of Airbnb’s AI Integration Strategy Airbnb’s rollout focuses on three primary areas: discovery, support, and internal operations. Currently, the company is testing a natural language search feature, allowing users to ask complex, multi-faceted questions about properties and destinations. For instance, a user could query, “Find a quiet cabin near hiking trails for a family of four with a dog, available next month,” and the AI would parse this intent to deliver relevant results. Furthermore, Airbnb’s existing AI customer service bot, which already autonomously handles approximately 30% of support tickets in North America, is slated for significant expansion. Chesky confirmed plans to add voice-based support and extend its language coverage globally. Internally, the company is pushing for 100% adoption of AI tools among its engineering team to boost productivity and innovation. Expert Analysis: The Data Advantage and Competitive Landscape The success of these AI-powered trip planning tools hinges on data. Airbnb possesses a unique and vast trove of structured and unstructured data, including detailed property descriptions, millions of guest reviews, host response patterns, and user identity signals. New Chief Technology Officer Ahmad Al-Dahle, formerly of Meta’s Llama AI team, is tasked with harnessing this data to train and refine models. This gives Airbnb a potential edge over generic AI travel tools. However, the company faces a delicate balance. Analysts immediately questioned the monetization of AI search through sponsored listings. Chesky emphasized prioritizing user experience first, noting that any future ad units must fit seamlessly within a conversational flow. This cautious approach reflects lessons from early web search, where ad relevance is critical to maintaining trust. Timeline, Testing, and the Future of Conversational Commerce Airbnb is adopting a measured, iterative launch strategy. The AI search feature is currently live for a “very small percentage” of user traffic, allowing for extensive experimentation. The roadmap, as outlined by Chesky, involves making search more conversational, integrating it deeper into the pre- and post-trip experience, and later exploring sponsored listings. This phased rollout mitigates risk and allows for user feedback to shape the final product. The broader industry trend, evidenced by moves from competitors like Booking.com and Google Travel, suggests conversational AI travel interfaces will become a standard expectation by 2025. Airbnb’s bet is that by deeply integrating AI into its core app experience, it can create a more sticky and valuable platform that reduces planning friction and builds user loyalty. Conclusion Airbnb’s comprehensive push into artificial intelligence signifies more than a feature update; it is a foundational shift towards a contextual and anticipatory service model. By deploying Airbnb AI features across search, support, and operations, the company aims to personalize the travel journey at an unprecedented scale. The focus on a conversational, intuitive interface, backed by its rich proprietary data, could redefine how users discover and book travel. While monetization and perfecting the user experience remain key challenges, this strategic direction firmly aligns with the evolving demands of the digital travel landscape, setting a new benchmark for what a modern travel platform should deliver. FAQs Q1: What exactly are the new AI features Airbnb is planning? Airbnb is developing an “AI-native” experience featuring natural language search for finding listings, AI-powered tools for comprehensive trip planning (including activities and logistics), enhanced AI customer support via chat and voice, and AI assistants for hosts to manage their properties more efficiently. Q2: When will these AI features be available to all users? Airbnb has not announced a public release date. The AI search is currently in a limited testing phase with a small percentage of users. The company is following an iterative rollout strategy, meaning features will likely be introduced and refined gradually throughout 2025. Q3: How will Airbnb’s AI use my data, and is it private? According to the company, the AI will use your identity and review data to personalize recommendations. Airbnb states it will adhere to its existing privacy policies. Users should review these policies to understand how their data is used for personalization and AI training. Q4: Will AI recommendations include paid or sponsored listings? CEO Brian Chesky confirmed that sponsored listings within AI search are a future consideration, but the current priority is perfecting the user experience and design. Any future ad units would be designed to fit naturally within a conversational search flow. Q5: How effective is Airbnb’s current AI customer service bot? The AI customer service bot, launched in North America, currently resolves about one-third of customer support issues without human intervention. Airbnb plans to expand this bot’s capabilities to handle voice calls and support more languages globally. This post Airbnb AI Features: The Revolutionary Shift to Personalized, Conversational Travel Planning first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
LINK holding critical support near 8.2435 at 8.83, resistance at 8.91 to be tested. BTC correlation risky in downtrend, 7.15 downside target.
The Trump administration is under intense criticism after it briefly posted and withdrew an updated list of Chinese companies alleged to be in bed with the Chinese military. The list posted briefly on the Federal Register identifies firms, within American jurisdiction, that are deemed to be “Chinese military companies.” It was up for only a short period on February 13, 2026. US posts and deletes list The Pentagon later reportedly requested its withdrawal without any concrete explanation. Among the high-profile names on the list were BYD, the world’s largest electric car manufacturer, Alibaba , Baidu, biotech company WuXi AppTec, AI-powered robotics tech company RoboSense Technology Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings, and major battery manufacturer, CATL. The list is formally known as Section 1260H “Chinese Military Companies” list and is mandated by Congress to be compiled by the US Department of Defense and consists of companies controlled by the Chinese military or in close ties with the Chinese military. The list does not automatically mean such companies are in any form of legal trouble, but it does some form of reputational harm to such companies because it implies that the US may take punitive measures against them in the future. However, biotechnology company WuXi AppTec will have its operations affected in the US, since it was placed on the list. This is due to the Biosecure Act, passed in December 2025, that prohibits the federal government from doing business with “biotechnology companies of concern”. Any company on the 1260H list happens to fall under this category. In a surprising move, the defense department removed CXMT and YMTC – two memory chipmakers- from the list. Companies like BYD and Baidu have pushed back on the idea that they are in with the Chinese military or the Chinese government. Alibaba says it will explore legal options in response to the Pentagon’s actions. The sudden withdrawal of the PDF from the Federal Register has confounded many, as it gives mixed signals about the Trump administration’s stance on foreign policy and national security challenges. Experts believe that the upcoming summit in April between President Trump and Xi Jinping might have played a role in the sudden withdrawal. Criticism from US lawmakers. Democratic lawmakers like Senator Mark Warner, ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, have accused the Trump administration of undermining US security interests by kowtowing to Beijing’s demands at such a critical juncture. He said : “The Trump administration has subordinated national security concerns to a haphazard and transactional approach, bowing to U.S. companies pursuing deals with (Chinese) companies-of-concern, granting licenses for export of sensitive U.S. technology, and permitting continued access to U.S. markets by (Chinese) national champions so long as it provides opportunities to enrich the president’s family and friends,” In a social media post, Representative Gregory Meeks stated: “This is appeasement, Trump is making Americans less safe by sacrificing technology security. “ China’s response Neither the Chinese government nor the Chinese Embassy has released a statement concerning the Pentagon’s latest moves. However, when the Biden administration caused a similar stir last year, a spokeswoman for China’s Ministry of Commerce criticized the US, saying that the US unjustifiably suppresses Chinese enterprises, and such actions severely disrupt international trade and economic order, and endanger the stability of global industry and supply chains. She continued that China urges the US to respect facts and rules, immediately cease its wrongful actions, and provide Chinese companies with fair, just and non-discriminatory treatment. The Pentagon says a revised list will be released in a few weeks, suggesting the withdrawal was nothing short of an administrative procedure. Whether this spells the beginning of a closer relationship between Beijing and Washington remains to be seen. But one thing is certain, all eyes are on the April summit between President Trump and President Xi. Earn 8% CASHBACK in USDC when you pay with COCA. Order your FREE card.
XMR has risen 6.99% in the last 24 hours to reach $357.60, but the downtrend prevails. Critical supports at $117-$100, resistances around $131 should be monitored; RSI at 38 with weak momentum.
Ripple pushes the Federal Reserve to modernize payment account rules to support stablecoin issuers, arguing targeted reforms could strengthen dollar dominance, reduce systemic risk and accelerate compliant digital asset integration into U.S. financial infrastructure. Ripple Urges Fed to Modify Payment Account Framework for Stablecoin Issuers Regulatory engagement around digital assets continues to expand as companies
BitcoinWorld Dutch Capital Gains Tax Shocker: 36% Levy on Crypto and Stocks Passes Lower House In a landmark move with profound implications for investors, the Dutch House of Representatives has passed a bill to impose a sweeping 36% capital gains tax on cryptocurrencies, stocks, and savings. This pivotal legislation, passed in The Hague on March 15, 2025, fundamentally reshapes the Dutch tax landscape by targeting both realized and, controversially, unrealized profits. Consequently, the financial community now faces a new era of fiscal responsibility and strategic planning. Understanding the Dutch Capital Gains Tax Bill The proposed legislation, formally known as the ‘Box 3 Reform Bill,’ aims to overhaul the Netherlands’ wealth tax system. Currently, the system taxes a notional return on net assets. However, the new bill shifts to taxing actual capital gains. This change represents a significant departure from decades of fiscal policy. The 36% rate will apply to profits generated from a broad range of liquid assets. Specifically, the tax targets: Cryptocurrencies: Including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and all other digital assets. Stock Investments: Shares traded on public exchanges. Savings Accounts: Interest earned above a government-set threshold. Interest-Bearing Products: Bonds and other fixed-income securities. Most notably, the tax applies to unrealized gains . This means individuals must pay tax on the increased value of their assets each year, even if they have not sold them. This provision has sparked intense debate among economists and financial advisors. Key Exemptions and the Legislative Pathway Forward While the scope is broad, the bill includes critical exemptions designed to foster innovation and protect certain asset classes. Lawmakers deliberately excluded shares in qualifying startups to encourage venture capital investment. Furthermore, non-investment physical assets, such as a primary residence or art collections held for personal enjoyment, remain outside the tax’s purview. The legislative journey, however, is only partially complete. The bill must now secure approval from the Dutch Senate, the Eerste Kamer. Following Senate passage, King Willem-Alexander must formally sign the bill into law. Political analysts suggest this process could take several months, with potential amendments likely during Senate review. Expert Analysis on Market and Investor Impact Financial experts are carefully weighing the bill’s potential consequences. “This move aligns the Netherlands with a growing EU trend toward comprehensive crypto and digital asset taxation,” notes Dr. Elara van Dijk, a professor of fiscal law at Leiden University. “The tax on unrealized gains, however, introduces liquidity challenges. Investors may need to sell assets simply to cover their annual tax liability, potentially creating sell pressure in markets.” Comparative data shows the proposed 36% rate positions the Netherlands competitively within Western Europe. Country Capital Gains Tax Rate (Financial Assets) Taxes Unrealized Gains? Netherlands (Proposed) 36% Yes Germany 26.375% (incl. solidarity surcharge) No France 30% (Flat Tax) No Belgium 0% (for most private individuals) No Industry groups have expressed concern about the administrative burden. Crypto exchanges and brokerage platforms may need to develop new reporting tools to help users calculate their annual taxable gains accurately. Meanwhile, tax advisors report a surge in consultations from clients seeking to restructure portfolios before the law potentially takes effect. Historical Context and Global Regulatory Trends This legislative action does not occur in a vacuum. The Dutch government has been gradually tightening regulations around cryptocurrency since the early 2020s. Previously, the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) implemented mandatory registration for crypto service providers. This new tax bill represents the next logical step in formalizing the digital asset economy. Globally, this move mirrors efforts by the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. These frameworks aim to standardize reporting and taxation across borders, reducing loopholes and ensuring fair contribution from the digital economy. Therefore, the Dutch policy may serve as a test case for other nations considering similar reforms. Conclusion The passage of the 36% Dutch capital gains tax bill by the lower house marks a critical juncture for investors and the broader financial market. Its application to unrealized gains on cryptocurrencies and stocks sets a notable precedent within Europe. While the bill must still navigate the Senate, its progression signals a clear governmental intent to modernize tax codes for the digital age. Investors, both domestic and international with Dutch assets, should closely monitor the legislative process and prepare for a new paradigm of fiscal reporting and liability. The final implementation will undoubtedly shape investment strategies and the attractiveness of the Netherlands as a financial hub for years to come. FAQs Q1: When would this new Dutch capital gains tax take effect? If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the new regime is tentatively scheduled to apply from January 1, 2026. The government may provide transitional rules for assets held before this date. Q2: How are unrealized gains on cryptocurrency calculated for the tax? Taxable unrealized gain would likely be the difference between the fair market value of the crypto asset on January 1 and its value on December 31 of the tax year. Specific valuation methods will be detailed in implementing regulations. Q3: Are losses deductible under this new system? Yes, the proposed system includes provisions to offset capital gains with capital losses. This can occur within the same asset class or potentially across different classes, subject to specific rules to prevent abuse. Q4: Does this tax affect non-residents holding Dutch assets? The tax primarily targets fiscal residents of the Netherlands. Non-residents are generally only taxed on specific Dutch-sourced income, but they should consult a tax professional regarding their specific situation, especially if using a Dutch-based exchange. Q5: What happens if I cannot pay the tax on my unrealized gains because I haven’t sold the asset? This is a key criticism of the bill. The tax liability remains due. Investors may need to sell a portion of their assets or use other liquid funds to pay. The government has discussed but not finalized potential payment plan options for demonstrable hardship cases. This post Dutch Capital Gains Tax Shocker: 36% Levy on Crypto and Stocks Passes Lower House first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
In BCH, RSI at 53.72 neutral level, MACD shows bullish momentum with positive histogram. Short-term trend strength above EMA20 supports upward potential with volume confirmation.
Bitcoin continues to struggle below the $70,000 level, with repeated attempts to regain upward momentum meeting persistent selling pressure. The inability to sustain rallies has kept market sentiment cautious, and several analysts are increasingly warning that a deeper correction below $60,000 remains possible if current conditions persist. Volatility has risen in recent weeks, while liquidity conditions appear tighter, contributing to a defensive posture among both retail and institutional participants. Despite this fragile backdrop, a recent CryptoQuant report offers a more nuanced perspective on the current phase. According to the analysis, Bitcoin has been trending downward for roughly four months following its all-time high reached in October 2025. While price action reflects sustained weakness, the report suggests the market may now be approaching what could be considered an undervalued zone from an on-chain valuation standpoint. Such phases have historically emerged during later stages of corrective cycles, when market participants gradually reassess positioning and speculative excesses are reduced. Although this does not necessarily signal an immediate rebound, it introduces the possibility that downside risk may begin to moderate if broader liquidity conditions stabilize. MVRV Signals Bitcoin Approaching Potential Undervaluation Zone The report further notes that valuation metrics are beginning to approach levels historically associated with accumulation phases. The Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio, a widely followed on-chain indicator, is currently near 1.1. Traditionally, readings below 1 have signaled that Bitcoin is trading below its aggregate cost basis, a condition often interpreted as undervaluation. While the indicator has not yet crossed that threshold, its proximity suggests the market may be entering a zone where downside risk gradually compresses. At the same time, analysts emphasize an important structural distinction from previous cycles. Unlike earlier bull markets, Bitcoin did not surge deep into a clearly overheated valuation zone before the recent correction began. This implies the current drawdown may not follow the same capitulation dynamics seen in prior bear market bottoms, complicating direct historical comparisons. From a strategic standpoint, the analysis suggests that periods of market weakness often provide the most effective window for long-term positioning. For assets with a persistent upward macro trajectory, preparation during downturns tends to improve risk-adjusted outcomes. However, this does not eliminate near-term volatility risks, particularly while macro liquidity conditions remain uncertain and sentiment continues to shift. Bitcoin Struggles Below Key Averages As Bearish Momentum Persists Bitcoin price action continues to show persistent weakness, with the chart illustrating a clear sequence of lower highs and lower lows since the late-2025 peak near the $120K–$125K region. The recent breakdown below the $70K level reinforces the bearish structure, particularly as price remains well below the 50-week and 100-week moving averages, both of which are now sloping downward. This alignment typically reflects sustained distribution rather than a temporary correction. The sharp selloff into the mid-$60K area was accompanied by a noticeable spike in trading volume, suggesting forced liquidations or aggressive spot selling rather than routine profit-taking. While price has attempted minor stabilization around the $65K–$68K range, the lack of strong rebound momentum indicates buyers remain cautious. Historically, such muted recoveries after high-volume declines often signal ongoing market uncertainty rather than immediate reversal. From a structural standpoint, the next critical technical focus lies near the $60K psychological level, which could act as interim support if selling pressure continues. Conversely, any sustained recovery would first require reclaiming the $70K zone and stabilizing above key moving averages. Until that occurs, the broader trend remains defensive, with volatility likely to persist as the market searches for a clearer equilibrium. Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com