Binance Refutes Claims Of Regulatory Missteps And Staff Dismissals

  vor 8 Monaten

Binance and news reporters are locking horns over a set of serious claims that have put more heat on the exchange’s compliance record. The matter centers on alleged transfers tied to Iran and on the treatment of staff who flagged those moves. At stake is how a giant platform handles risk when past missteps still hang over it. Allegations And Denials Collide According to reporting by Fortune , internal teams found more than $1 billion in transfers linked to Iranian entities that moved through the exchange between March 2024 and August 2025. The pieces named stablecoin flows on the network run by Tron and pointed to a familiar issuer, Tether. Reports say several investigators who documented those flows were later let go. That claim, if true, would raise questions about how warnings from inside a company are handled. Binance pushed back hard. The platform, represented by its leadership, called the claims false and said a full internal review with outside counsel found no sanctions breaches. The record must be clear. No sanctions violations were found, no investigators were fired for raising concerns, and Binance continues to meet its regulatory commitments. We’ve asked for corrections to recent reporting. pic.twitter.com/glA9bdGaw1 — Richard Teng (@_RichardTeng) February 16, 2026 “This is categorically false. No investigator was dismissed for raising compliance concerns or for reporting potential sanctions issues as there are no violations,” the exchange disclosed in an email circulated by Binance CEO, Richard Teng. “The record must be clear. No sanctions violations were found, no investigators were fired for raising concerns, and Binance continues to meet its regulatory commitments,” Teng said in an X post. The response noted that none of the wallets in question were sanctioned at the time the activity took place. Still, critics say the real test is evidence and outside oversight, not statements from either side. Questions Around Internal Reviews A separate set of reporting by Financial Times added fuel to the debate last December by showing internal data that, according to that outlet, suggested suspicious accounts continued to move big sums after Binance’s 2023 settlement with US authorities. That 2023 agreement led to a $4.3 billion penalty and to changes in leadership. The firm’s founder, Changpeng Zhao , later faced legal consequences. Legal experts say there is a meaningful legal line between knowingly processing funds tied to sanctioned entities and handling transactions that later turn out to be problematic. Records and timestamps matter. So do who knew what, and when they knew it. In this case, the exchange says internal checks found no violations and that monitoring continues under the terms of its US settlement. Regulators Watch Closely Reports note that the story adds to an ongoing narrative: big crypto firms operating under close scrutiny, where any hint of lax controls draws attention. This dispute may end with more documentation, an independent probe, or simply with each side standing by its version. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView

Weiterlesen

XRPL Validator: XRP Used $73K in Electricity, While Bitcoin Burned $8B-$12B

  vor 8 Monaten

Recent disclosures from the XRP Ledger community have brought renewed focus to the stark contrast in energy usage between major blockchain networks. Data shared by Vet , a long-standing validator on the XRP Ledger, outlines how XRP’s underlying infrastructure operates at a fraction of the energy cost associated with Bitcoin. According to the figures presented, the XRP Ledger’s total electricity consumption over the past year amounted to roughly $73,000. By comparison, Bitcoin’s annual power demand is estimated to translate into electricity expenses ranging between $8 billion and $12 billion, based on industrial energy pricing. The comparison underscores how fundamentally different design choices result in vastly different operational footprints. How XRP’s Energy Use Is Calculated Vet’s analysis draws from recent XRP Ledger network metrics as of mid-February 2026. These figures indicate that the XRPL consumed slightly over 400,000 kilowatt-hours across the entire year. XRP used $73,000 in electricity to run the entire network for 1 year. Bitcoin used $8,000,000,000 – $12,000,000,000 in electricity to run the entire network for 1year. (Industrial electricity rate, not residential) On per transaction basis this results in $0.0000028 per XRP Tx… pic.twitter.com/pVFWpC9b7p — Vet (@Vet_X0) February 15, 2026 When distributed across total transaction throughput, the energy requirement per transaction is measured in fractions of a watt-hour, translating to a negligible cost measured in millionths of a dollar per transfer. This low consumption reflects the XRPL’s validator-based consensus system, which does not rely on competitive computation. Instead of expending energy to solve cryptographic puzzles, validators agree on transaction order through a coordination process that requires minimal processing power. Bitcoin’s Power Demand Remains Orders of Magnitude Higher By contrast, Bitcoin’s electricity usage continues to scale with its Proof-of-Work mining model. Estimates from the University of Cambridge Judge Business School Centre for Alternative Finance place Bitcoin’s lower-bound energy demand near 100 terawatt-hours per year. This level of consumption rivals that of some mid-sized countries. When converted into monetary terms using industrial electricity rates, the resulting cost aligns with Vet’s estimate of multi-billion-dollar annual spending. On a per-transaction basis, this implies energy costs that can reach tens of dollars, depending on network conditions and mining efficiency. Developer Perspectives on Infrastructure and Sustainability Additional context came from Wietse Wind, founder of XRPL Labs, who emphasized that XRPL’s efficiency becomes even more pronounced when focusing strictly on electricity usage rather than hardware investments. He noted that a large portion of XRPL Labs’ infrastructure is powered by solar energy, including stored power used outside daylight hours. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Another XRPL developer, Bird, added that the energy difference between the two networks translates into significant avoided consumption. In his assessment, XRP transactions are effectively millions of times cheaper from an electricity standpoint, representing billions of dollars in power usage that never had to occur. The divergence in energy demand comes from architecture rather than scale alone. Bitcoin’s security model is intentionally energy-intensive, relying on mining competition to prevent network manipulation. XRP, on the other hand, achieves consensus through validator agreement without requiring energy-heavy computation. Historical estimates have shown Bitcoin accounting for a measurable share of global electricity usage, while XRPL’s annual consumption has consistently remained within the range of hundreds of megawatt-hours. The latest figures suggest that the trend has not changed. Who Pays Bitcoin’s Energy Bill Vet also addressed the economic implications of Bitcoin’s electricity demand. Miners absorb energy costs directly and typically offset expenses by selling part of their block rewards. During periods of market weakness, this can introduce sustained selling pressure because operating margins tighten. While Bitcoin supporters argue that high energy use underpins network security, critics maintain that more efficient alternatives can support global payments without comparable environmental or financial costs. The data reinforces a long-standing argument within the digital asset space, which is that network design choices carry lasting consequences. XRP’s low-energy model continues to position it as a candidate for large-scale payments infrastructure, while Bitcoin’s power usage remains a defining and controversial feature of its system. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRPL Validator: XRP Used $73K in Electricity, While Bitcoin Burned $8B-$12B appeared first on Times Tabloid .

Weiterlesen

XRP Ledger Positioned At The Heart Of Japan’s Next Financial Transformation

  vor 8 Monaten

With a strong regulatory environment, proactive institutional participation, and a growing appetite for blockchain-powered financial solutions, Japan is positioning itself at the forefront of next-generation finance, and XRPL is increasingly becoming central to that vision. Japan is placing a huge bet on the XRP Ledger identity and leading protocol. Crypto analyst Stellar Rippler revealed on X that a senior banker from the Bank of Japan (BoJ), Kazuo Ueda, reportedly stated that SBI holdings has invested in XRP, XRP Ledger-native identity protocols, compliance, and lending projects. Meanwhile, that backdrop became even more significant when SBI Holdings CEO Yoshitaka Kitao said the firm holds hidden assets worth more than its officially disclosed 9% stake, which is valued at over $10 billion. Why Japan Is Looking Beyond Payments To XRPL Infrastructure Interestingly, the strategic direction becomes clearer when viewed through the lens of identity. Ripple’s president, Monica Long, has described decentralized identity on XRPL as a way to turn personal information into a secure, portable digital token that users can carry globally and selectively share, replacing reliance on centralized platforms. Related Reading: XRP Ledger DEX Metrics Flash Strong Growth As Activity Touches New Key Levels This vision is already taking shape at the infrastructure level. DNAOnChain’s XDNA applies this model with zero-knowledge proofs to transform identity and compliance data into verifiable zk-credentials. Also, these allow institutions to confirm eligibility and regulatory status without exposing sensitive information. However, the SBI’s hidden asset has extended beyond XRP, and it’s pointing toward the XRPL’s identity and zero-knowledge credential layer, where XDNA fits in as the infrastructure institutions needed. XRP is actively used as a bridge currency for liquidity on the XRP Ledger, alongside stablecoins, which are complementary. An analyst known as Vet on X has noted that recent activity on the XRPL DEX shows that RLUSD is being exchanged for EUROP, a euro-denominated stablecoin, with XRP acting as the bridge asset. By serving as an intermediary layer, XRP increases the liquidity of issued assets across the network. Furthermore, this design results in a proven, robust financial infrastructure that maximizes capital efficiency for everyday users and institutions. At the same time, market makers can make markets between the respective XRP pairs; they can hold the token because it is counterparty-free, which makes it the most efficient way to make markets. The Role Of The XRP In A Tokenized FX Future According to RippleBullWinkle, founder of Lux Lions NFT, the global foreign exchange market is moving roughly $9.6 trillion in daily volume. Related Reading: XRP Price Falls Below $1.6: You Won’t Believe What Institutions Are Doing Amid The Crash In the meantime, industry insiders are projecting an on-chain FX system for local currency stablecoins from countries around the world, in which they can settle directly on-chain against the dollar stablecoins. This is where XRP’s original design becomes relevant, because XRP was literally built to function as a bridge asset between currencies. Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com

Weiterlesen

Gold Forecast: Researchers See Prices Hovering Near $5,000 in Q1 2026

  vor 8 Monaten

Gold is expected to trade around current prices through the first quarter, according to Sucden Financial market strategists, even as prices pulled back modestly on Feb. 16 amid thin holiday liquidity and profit-taking. Gold Prices Cool but Analysts Maintain $5,000 Q1 View In its Q1 2026 Quarterly Metals Report, Sucden Financial’s Head of Research Daria

Weiterlesen

Steak 'n Shake sales jump after accepting bitcoin payments

  vor 8 Monaten

Steak ‘n Shake says its sales have climbed sharply since it started letting customers pay with Bitcoi n ni ne months ago, marking one of the most aggressive cryptocurrency pushes in the fast-food industry. The national burger restaurant announced the sales increase on Tuesday, saying its decision to accept digital currency payments has paid off. The company started taking Bitcoin in May 2025 and now holds about $15 million worth of the cryptocurrency in what it calls a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. “Our same-store sales have risen dramatically ever since,” the company said in a statement marking the nine-month anniversary of its Bitcoin program launch. The chain, which operates hundreds of locations across the United States and several European countries including France, Italy, Portugal, and Monaco, reported saving almost half its usual transaction costs within just two weeks of accepting Bitcoin. That’s compared to traditional credit card processing fees that typically eat into restaurant profits. Industry-first Bitcoin reserve established By the end of October 2025, Steak ‘n Shake became the first big U.S. restaurant chain to set up a dedicated Bitcoin reserve. The company said it saw a 15 percent jump in sales at existing stores thanks to cryptocurrency-friendly customers. The restaurant accepts Bitcoin through something called the Lightning Network, which lets transactions happen faster and cheaper. Block co-founder Jack Dorsey backed the move when i t la unched. All Bitcoin payment s cu stomers make for burgers and shakes go straight into the company’s reserve fund. That mone y th en gets used to pay employee bonuses in Bitcoin, creating what the company calls a “decentralized, cash-producing operating business.” Steak ‘n Shake has kept adding to its cryptocurrency stash. After an initial $10 million position, the chain bought another $10 million worth on January 16 and $5 million more on January 27. That bring s to tal holdings to roughly 168.6 Bitcoin. The company ran promotions like the “Bitcoin Burger” that gave customers small amounts of Bitcoin when they bought certain menu items. For every “Bitcoin Meal” sold, the chain donated 210 satoshis, tiny fractions of a Bitcoin, to support open-source Bitcoin software development. Employee bonuses draw mixed reactions In late January, Steak ‘n Shake announce d it would give hourly workers at company-owned stores a Bitcoin bonus worth 21 cents per hour starting March 1. But the offer drew complaints because employees can’t touch the money for two years, and franchise workers don’t get it at all. The restaurant’s owner, Biglari Holdings, hasn’t said whether Bitcoin will become part of its overall corporate money strategy. That suggest s th e cryptocurrency push is specific to the Steak ‘n Shake brand rather than a company-wide financial plan. Sales numbers back up the strategy so far. The chain reported 18 percent growth at existing stores in 2026 and “double digits” growth last year, beating most competitors. Steak ‘n Shake plans to open locations in El Salvador , where Bitcoin i s le gal money. The company attended Bitcoin events in San Salvador last November and announced expansion plans shortly after. The chain briefly asked customers if it should accept Ethereum, another cryptocurrency, but quickly pulled the survey afte r an gry responses. “Our allegiance is with Bitcoiners,” the company said. The transaction fee savings alone could justify the move, restaurants operate on thin profit margins where every percentage point counts. The strategy works because it creates a loop. Bitcoin payments fund employee bonuses, which might attract tech-savvy workers, which improves service, which brings in more customers willing to pay with Bitcoin. It’s a bet that cryptocurrency users will become loyal customers if given reasons to keep coming back. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Weiterlesen

Bank Indonesia’s Crucial Choice: Prioritizing Rupiah Stability Over Growth Signals Regional Shift

  vor 8 Monaten

BitcoinWorld Bank Indonesia’s Crucial Choice: Prioritizing Rupiah Stability Over Growth Signals Regional Shift JAKARTA, Indonesia – March 2025: Bank Indonesia faces mounting pressure as global monetary conditions tighten, forcing the central bank to make a pivotal decision that could reshape Southeast Asia’s largest economy. According to recent analysis from BNY Mellon, Indonesia’s monetary authority now prioritizes foreign exchange stability over economic growth, marking a significant policy shift with far-reaching implications for regional markets and investors. Bank Indonesia’s Monetary Policy Dilemma in 2025 Central banks worldwide confront complex challenges in 2025’s volatile economic landscape. Bank Indonesia specifically navigates conflicting objectives between supporting domestic growth and maintaining currency stability. The Indonesian Rupiah faces persistent pressure from multiple directions, including Federal Reserve policies, commodity price fluctuations, and regional economic dynamics. Consequently, BNY Mellon’s research indicates a clear strategic pivot toward exchange rate management. This policy shift represents a substantial departure from previous approaches. Historically, Bank Indonesia balanced growth objectives with inflation targeting. However, current global conditions necessitate stronger emphasis on currency defense. The central bank’s foreign exchange reserves, while substantial, require careful management amid capital outflow risks. Furthermore, Indonesia’s current account position influences these policy decisions significantly. The Mechanics of Rupiah Stability Operations Bank Indonesia employs multiple tools to stabilize the national currency. Foreign exchange intervention remains the primary mechanism, involving direct market operations to smooth volatility. Additionally, interest rate adjustments serve as complementary measures, though they carry growth implications. The central bank also utilizes macroprudential policies to manage capital flows without disrupting domestic credit conditions. Recent data reveals specific intervention patterns. During February 2025, Bank Indonesia reportedly intervened more aggressively during Asian trading hours. This timing strategically addresses regional currency movements. Moreover, coordination with regional central banks enhances intervention effectiveness. The Monetary Authority of Singapore and Bank Negara Malaysia face similar challenges, creating opportunities for synchronized responses. BNY Mellon’s Analytical Framework BNY Mellon’s foreign exchange research team provides detailed insights into Indonesia’s policy environment. Their analysis incorporates multiple data streams, including real-time transaction flows, reserve movements, and policy statements. The team identifies three key indicators of Bank Indonesia’s priorities: intervention frequency, reserve adequacy metrics, and forward guidance language. According to their latest report, Bank Indonesia’s actions demonstrate clear prioritization. Foreign exchange stability now receives precedence over traditional growth-supporting measures. This assessment stems from observable policy patterns rather than official statements. The central bank’s operational framework has evolved to address emerging market vulnerabilities in the current global context. Regional Implications and Comparative Analysis Indonesia’s policy shift reflects broader emerging market trends. Several Asian central banks face similar trade-offs between growth and stability. The table below illustrates comparative approaches across Southeast Asia: Country Primary Focus Key Tools Recent Actions Indonesia FX Stability Direct Intervention, Rate Policy Aggressive USD/IDR defense Thailand Growth Support Tourism Stimulus, Fiscal Policy Baht management with growth focus Philippines Inflation Control Rate Hikes, Supply-side Measures Prioritizing price stability Malaysia Balanced Approach Managed Float, Capital Controls Ringgit defense with growth measures This comparative perspective highlights Indonesia’s distinctive position. While neighboring countries maintain different priorities, Bank Indonesia’s focus on currency stability reflects specific national circumstances. Indonesia’s external debt profile, import dependency, and investor sentiment all contribute to this policy orientation. Economic Impacts and Market Reactions Financial markets respond to Bank Indonesia’s policy stance with measured reactions. The Rupiah demonstrates relative stability compared to regional peers, though volatility persists during global risk-off episodes. Domestic bond markets experience mixed effects, with short-term instruments benefiting from stability while longer-dated securities face growth concerns. Several sectors feel immediate consequences from this policy environment: Export Industries: Competitive advantages from stable exchange rates Import-Dependent Businesses: Reduced currency volatility benefits Financial Institutions: Improved hedging environment Foreign Investors: Enhanced predictability for portfolio decisions However, growth-sensitive sectors face challenges. Consumer spending may moderate as monetary conditions tighten indirectly. Investment decisions could delay amid uncertainty about future policy directions. The government’s fiscal policy must therefore complement monetary measures to sustain economic momentum. Historical Context and Policy Evolution Bank Indonesia’s current stance reflects lessons from previous crises. The 1997 Asian Financial Crisis demonstrated vulnerabilities from currency mismatches and inadequate reserves. Subsequent reforms strengthened the central bank’s institutional framework and policy toolkit. The 2013 Taper Tantrum episode further highlighted the importance of proactive currency management. These historical experiences inform today’s policy decisions. Bank Indonesia maintains substantial foreign exchange reserves as a defensive buffer. Regular stress testing evaluates reserve adequacy under various scenarios. Additionally, coordination with fiscal authorities ensures policy coherence across economic management domains. Future Outlook and Policy Considerations Looking forward, Bank Indonesia faces evolving challenges. Global monetary conditions continue shifting as major central banks adjust policies. Commodity price cycles affect Indonesia’s terms of trade and currency fundamentals. Regional integration initiatives create both opportunities and complexities for exchange rate management. The central bank must balance several considerations: Sustaining adequate reserve levels for confidence Managing inflation expectations amid currency stability efforts Supporting economic recovery where possible Maintaining financial system stability throughout Policy communication remains crucial during this period. Clear forward guidance helps anchor market expectations. Transparent intervention frameworks reduce uncertainty for market participants. Regular policy reviews ensure responsiveness to changing conditions while maintaining consistency with stated objectives. Conclusion Bank Indonesia’s monetary policy prioritization represents a pragmatic response to current global economic realities. The focus on Rupiah stability over immediate growth objectives reflects careful risk assessment and strategic planning. BNY Mellon’s analysis provides valuable insights into this policy shift and its implications for Indonesia’s economic trajectory. As global conditions evolve, Bank Indonesia’s approach may serve as a reference for other emerging market central banks facing similar dilemmas between growth and stability objectives. FAQs Q1: Why is Bank Indonesia prioritizing currency stability over economic growth? Bank Indonesia faces external pressures including global monetary tightening, capital flow volatility, and commodity price fluctuations. Maintaining Rupiah stability prevents imported inflation, preserves foreign exchange reserves, and supports overall economic stability, which ultimately creates better conditions for sustainable growth. Q2: How does Bank Indonesia intervene to support the Rupiah? The central bank employs direct foreign exchange market operations, buying Rupiah when it weakens excessively. It also uses interest rate adjustments and macroprudential measures to influence capital flows. These interventions aim to smooth volatility rather than target specific exchange rate levels. Q3: What are the risks of focusing too much on currency stability? Excessive focus on exchange rate management could lead to higher domestic interest rates, potentially slowing economic growth. It might also deplete foreign exchange reserves if interventions prove unsustainable. Additionally, it could divert policy attention from other important objectives like financial stability and inflation control. Q4: How does Indonesia’s approach compare to other Southeast Asian countries? Indonesia takes a more explicit currency stability focus compared to neighbors like Thailand (growth-oriented) and the Philippines (inflation-focused). Malaysia maintains a more balanced approach. These differences reflect varying economic structures, external vulnerabilities, and policy frameworks across the region. Q5: What indicators should investors watch regarding Bank Indonesia’s policy effectiveness? Key indicators include foreign exchange reserve levels, Rupiah volatility measures, current account balance trends, and inflation expectations. Additionally, market-based measures like forward premiums and option-implied volatility provide insights into policy credibility and effectiveness over time. This post Bank Indonesia’s Crucial Choice: Prioritizing Rupiah Stability Over Growth Signals Regional Shift first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Weiterlesen

France earns crypto kidnapping capital title as 2026 starts with violent streak

  vor 8 Monaten

France is famous for things like the Eiffel Tower and fashion, but now crypto kidnapping has also joined that list. Following a persistent series of crypto-linked kidnappings, media outlets are now referring to France as the “global crypto kidnapping capital.” France, the cryptokidnapping capital of the world France has been getting a bad rap lately, and 2026 has seen a continuation of that trend. It has just been named the leading hub for crypto-related kidnappings aka wrench attacks, a new form of crime that has been growing in frequency in recent times. Wrench attacks often involve getting physical or resorting to threats and abduction to compel victims to transfer their digital assets. According to a recent Gravitas special report by WION, there were up to 19 wrench attacks in France last year, the highest of any country globally. This year alone, the country has witnessed up to six different cases of wrench attacks, solidifying the nation’s position as the global epicenter of this new kind of crime, and the stories are gruesome. As Cryptopolitan reported earlier this month, Binance France CEO David Prinçay was the victim of a poorly executed house invasion in Val-de-Marne. Local police reports said that three masked men who were allegedly armed broke into a residential building early on February 12, around seven o’clock, in an attempt to find Binance’s local CEO. Earlier this month, the partner of a 35-year-old magistrate in France received a picture of his partner accompanied by threats to mutilate her if they did not pay a ransom in cryptocurrency. The man’s wife had been targeted because he was an associate in a start-up with a cryptocurrency business. He reported the demand to French police, sparking a multi-agency manhunt involving as many as 160 officers. The magistrate and her elderly mother were in the custody of the kidnappers for 30 hours in a garage in southern France’s Drôme region until they received help from a neighbor who heard their commotion and helped them escape. No ransom was paid in this case, and the French authorities have reportedly arrested six suspects in connection with the case. It is one of the latest crypto-linked kidnappings to happen in France, which has been facing a wave of crypto-related wrench attacks and violent kidnappings targeting crypto natives. The driving force behind the violence Wrench attacks have been a problem for the crypto industry for years. However, the recent string of high-profile violent attacks over the past year has heightened the threat level for crypto investors, especially those located in France. Several factors are fueling this surge, with the most crucial one being data breaches. In June 2025, French media reported that an employee with the country’s tax agency had been steadily providing other alleged criminals with data on different crypto investors in the country. To make matters worse, this January, it was revealed that Waltio , a service that lets investors calculate and report their crypto capital gains for tax reports, had been hacked. That attack allowed the attackers to gain access to 50,000 Waltio customers’ data, including email addresses and their 2024 tax reports. Sensitive leaks are one thing, but another factor that makes crypto such an enticing sector for wrench attacks is that crypto makes a more convenient target to steal because digital assets are becoming more ubiquitous. “As cryptocurrency adoption grows and more value is held directly by individuals, criminals are increasingly incentivised to bypass technical defenses altogether and target people instead,” TRM Labs’ Global Head of Policy, Ari Redbord, said. The incidents have driven fear into the hearts of many crypto natives, forcing many to invest in physical security, especially during trips to France. A critical observation Globally, the frequency of wrench attacks has gone up by 75% year-on-year from 2024, with about 25 kidnappings, 3 murders over $40 million in losses. Europe accounts for nearly 40% of all these incidents, with France leading most countries by a wide margin. Many of the perpetrators who have been caught are young, often minors or young adults recruited via apps like Telegram and paid relatively small amounts to carry out the attacks. However, despite the arrests and severity of crimes, there have been no convictions, and experts believe this contributes to the lack of deterrence. As more wrench attacks are recorded, pressure is mounting on the French government to impose harsher penalties on convicted criminals and strengthen protections for its crypto population. Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Weiterlesen

Bloomberg Strategist Warns Bitcoin Faces Steep Correction Toward $10,000

  vor 8 Monaten

Mike McGlone warns Bitcoin could drop to $10,000 based on historical patterns. Analyst cites tightening monetary policy and fading ETF demand as risk factors. Continue Reading: Bloomberg Strategist Warns Bitcoin Faces Steep Correction Toward $10,000 The post Bloomberg Strategist Warns Bitcoin Faces Steep Correction Toward $10,000 appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

Weiterlesen

Copyright © 2026 Aktuelle Krypto Kurse. - Impressum