More on Crypto Empirical Evidence Suggests The Crypto Winter May Last Much Longer Michael Saylor's Strategy says it can weather Bitcoin drop to $8,000 while covering debt Coinbase CEO: Stablecoins will become the default currency for AI agents Bessent continues to push Congress to pass crypto bill
BitcoinWorld EUR/JPY Plummets: BoJ Rate Hike Fears and Eurozone Gloom Trigger Currency Crisis TOKYO/FRANKFURT – The EUR/JPY currency pair experienced significant downward pressure this week, dropping to three-month lows as contrasting monetary policy expectations between the Bank of Japan and European Central Bank reshaped forex market dynamics. Market participants now closely monitor potential BoJ rate adjustments alongside deteriorating Eurozone economic indicators that collectively threaten to redefine the cross-currency relationship established over the past decade. EUR/JPY Technical Breakdown and Current Market Position The EUR/JPY pair currently trades at 158.50, representing a 2.3% decline from last week’s opening levels. Technical analysis reveals the currency cross has broken below its 100-day moving average, signaling potential further weakness ahead. Market volatility indicators show increased activity, with the pair experiencing its largest single-day drop since March 2024. Trading volumes surged 45% above the monthly average, reflecting heightened institutional interest in this developing story. Several key technical levels now come into focus for traders. The immediate support sits at 157.80, followed by stronger support at 156.40. Resistance levels appear at 160.20 and 161.50, creating clear boundaries for potential price movements. The Relative Strength Index currently reads 38, suggesting the pair approaches oversold territory but maintains room for additional downward movement. Bank of Japan Policy Shift: From Ultra-Loose to Potential Tightening The Bank of Japan faces mounting pressure to adjust its longstanding negative interest rate policy as domestic inflation persists above target levels. Recent Consumer Price Index data shows Japan’s core inflation holding at 2.8% for the third consecutive month, significantly exceeding the BoJ’s 2% target. Governor Kazuo Ueda’s recent parliamentary comments hinted at potential policy normalization, stating the central bank would “consider adjusting monetary easing if sustainable inflation accompanied by wage growth appears achievable.” Historical Context and Policy Evolution Japan maintained negative interest rates since 2016, creating one of the world’s most accommodative monetary environments. This policy divergence from other major economies supported yen weakness for nearly a decade. However, shifting global conditions now force reconsideration. The BoJ already abandoned yield curve control in 2023, marking the first significant policy shift in seven years. Market participants increasingly price in a 40% probability of a rate hike by June 2025, according to overnight index swap data. Analysts identify several factors driving this potential policy change: Sustained inflation: Japan experiences its longest inflation streak since the 1990s Wage growth momentum: Spring wage negotiations produced 3.6% average increases Currency considerations: Yen weakness creates import cost pressures Global normalization: Most major central banks maintain higher policy rates Eurozone Economic Sentiment: Deteriorating Fundamentals Simultaneously, Eurozone economic indicators show concerning weakness across multiple dimensions. The European Commission’s Economic Sentiment Indicator fell to 95.8 in the latest reading, marking the fourth consecutive monthly decline. Germany’s IFO Business Climate Index dropped to 88.6, reflecting deteriorating confidence in Europe’s largest economy. Manufacturing PMI data remains contractionary at 47.3, while services sector growth slows noticeably. Regional disparities within the Eurozone create additional complications. Southern European nations show relative resilience, while core economies like Germany and France face more pronounced challenges. This fragmentation complicates the European Central Bank’s policy decisions, as uniform measures may not address divergent economic conditions effectively. Eurozone Economic Indicators Comparison (Latest vs. Previous) Indicator Current Reading Previous Month Direction Economic Sentiment 95.8 97.2 ↓ Industrial Confidence -9.7 -8.8 ↓ Consumer Confidence -15.5 -14.9 ↓ Services Confidence 8.4 9.5 ↓ Monetary Policy Divergence and Currency Implications The emerging policy divergence creates fundamental pressure on the EUR/JPY exchange rate. Historically, widening interest rate differentials between currency pairs drive capital flows toward higher-yielding assets. However, the current situation presents a unique scenario where expectations shift in opposite directions simultaneously. The potential for BoJ tightening combined with possible ECB easing creates what analysts term a “double divergence” scenario. Interest rate differentials between German and Japanese government bonds narrowed significantly in recent weeks. The 10-year spread compressed from 280 basis points to 240 basis points, reflecting changing expectations. This compression reduces the euro’s yield advantage, diminishing its attractiveness to international investors seeking income. Consequently, capital flows show early signs of rotation from euro-denominated assets toward yen-based instruments. Expert Analysis and Market Perspectives Financial institutions adjust their EUR/JPY forecasts accordingly. Goldman Sachs revised its three-month target to 155.00 from 162.00, citing “asymmetric policy risks.” Morgan Stanley analysts note that “the yen appears undervalued relative to fundamentals, while euro valuation metrics suggest limited upside potential.” Japanese institutional investors, traditionally significant buyers of European debt, reportedly reduced euro exposure by approximately 15% over the past quarter. Market positioning data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reveals notable shifts. Leveraged funds increased short euro positions against the yen by 32,000 contracts, representing the largest weekly adjustment since January 2024. Meanwhile, asset managers reduced long euro exposure by approximately €4.2 billion, according to European Central Bank custody data. Global Context and Cross-Market Impacts The EUR/JPY movement occurs within broader global financial market adjustments. The U.S. Federal Reserve maintains a cautious stance on rate cuts, creating additional complexity for currency crosses. Dollar strength against both currencies amplifies the EUR/JPY move, as investors seek relative value opportunities across multiple pairs. Commodity markets show mixed reactions, with gold prices benefiting from currency volatility while industrial metals face pressure from growth concerns. Equity markets demonstrate sector-specific impacts. Japanese exporters benefit from yen weakness, with automotive and technology stocks outperforming. Conversely, European luxury goods companies face headwinds from both currency movements and demand concerns in key Asian markets. The STOXX Europe 600 Index underperformed global benchmarks by 3.2% year-to-date, partially reflecting currency-related earnings pressures. Risk Factors and Future Scenarios Several developments could alter the current trajectory. First, the Bank of Japan may delay policy normalization if economic data weakens unexpectedly. Second, Eurozone sentiment could stabilize if energy prices decline or fiscal stimulus measures prove effective. Third, geopolitical developments might influence safe-haven flows toward both currencies under different circumstances. Analysts outline three potential scenarios for the coming quarter: Base case (60% probability): Gradual BoJ normalization with continued Eurozone weakness pushes EUR/JPY toward 155.00 Bullish euro scenario (25%): Eurozone recovery surprises markets, supporting the pair near current levels Accelerated adjustment (15%): Rapid BoJ tightening triggers sharp yen appreciation, testing 152.00 support Conclusion The EUR/JPY currency pair faces sustained pressure from diverging monetary policy expectations and contrasting economic fundamentals. Bank of Japan rate hike speculation combines with Eurozone sentiment concerns to create a challenging environment for the cross. Market participants must monitor both Japanese inflation dynamics and European economic indicators closely, as developments in either region could significantly impact exchange rate movements. The EUR/JPY relationship serves as a barometer for broader global monetary policy divergence, offering insights into shifting capital flows and relative economic performance between major economic blocs. FAQs Q1: What specific Bank of Japan actions are markets anticipating? The financial markets increasingly expect the BoJ to end negative interest rates, potentially raising its policy rate from -0.1% to 0.0% or 0.1% in the coming months. Additionally, markets anticipate further adjustments to the central bank’s yield curve control framework and possible reductions in asset purchases. Q2: How does Eurozone sentiment typically affect the euro’s value? Deteriorating economic sentiment generally weakens the euro through multiple channels. First, it reduces expectations for European Central Bank rate hikes or increases expectations for cuts. Second, it diminishes foreign investment inflows seeking growth opportunities. Third, it can trigger capital outflows to stronger economies, creating direct selling pressure on the currency. Q3: What technical levels should traders watch for EUR/JPY? Traders monitor several key technical levels. Immediate support sits at 157.80, followed by 156.40 and 155.00. Resistance appears at 160.20, 161.50, and 163.00. The 200-day moving average at 159.80 provides additional context, with sustained trading below this level suggesting bearish momentum. Q4: How do interest rate differentials influence currency pairs like EUR/JPY? Interest rate differentials create carry trade opportunities where investors borrow in low-yielding currencies to invest in higher-yielding ones. Historically, the euro’s yield advantage supported EUR/JPY strength. However, narrowing differentials reduce this advantage, potentially triggering unwinding of carry trade positions and currency pair weakness. Q5: What economic indicators most directly impact EUR/JPY movements? Key indicators include Japanese inflation data (CPI), Eurozone sentiment surveys (ESI), interest rate decisions from both central banks, wage growth figures in Japan, German industrial production, and relative bond yield movements. Additionally, broader risk sentiment indicators like equity market volatility influence safe-haven flows between the currencies. This post EUR/JPY Plummets: BoJ Rate Hike Fears and Eurozone Gloom Trigger Currency Crisis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
The bank also holds a large put option position on Strategy, potentially capitalizing on the company trading above the value of its BTC holdings.
The paper mailers mimic Ledger and Trezor branding and device update themes to push users toward malicious verification sites.
ORCA, the native token of the Orca DEX, rallied against the market, turning into one of the day’s winners. The token triggered a short squeeze, in addition to a boost from whale buying. ORCA climbed to a one-month peak over $1.62 in a seemingly unexpected rally. The token rose rapidly, adding more than 62% to its price in a single day. ORCA also traded with the highest volumes since December, breaking above $182M in the past 24 hours. ORCA was tracking the crypto market while slowly unwinding, leading to an accumulation of short positions. The token slumped despite the Orca DEX’s role in the Solana ecosystem and its still robust trading volumes. ORCA rallied vertically after weeks of slow unwinding, following a spike in open interest and a short squeeze. | Source: Coingecko The main driver of ORCA is derivative trading. The token has seen previous rallies boosted by a short squeeze, when derivative markets reacted. During the recent rally, open interest for the token rose to a six-month peak of over $23M, as traders attempted to make the best of a short-term pump. Orca has previously achieved 170% daily rallies, caused by its Upbit listing . Why is ORCA rallying? The main reason for ORCA liquidations was a short squeeze, catching $1.83M in short positions for the past 24 hours. As the token climb accelerated, $454K in liquidations happened in a single hour. ORCA open interest spiked to a six-month high, as traders still tried to short the rally. | Source: Coinalyze ORCA reacts extremely fast, as it has a high concentration of trading on South Korean exchanges. The token is thus similar to PENGU or other assets listed on Bithumb and Upbit. More than 75% of ORCA volumes are against the Korean won, tapping a market with still sufficient enthusiasm for crypto tokens. Everywhere else, ORCA has been shorted along with other altcoins. Additionally, a known Bithumb whale has continued to accumulate ORCA in expectations of a return to a higher price range. The Bithumb whale is accumulating $ORCA again. pic.twitter.com/FKrJw0HpYo — yoonseok (@koreaOnchain) February 17, 2026 While ORCA is highly active in South Korea, the token is barely represented on Hyperliquid. More than 50% of the asset’s activity is concentrated on Upbit, also allowing concentrated liquidity to sway the price. ORCA remains a key DEX on Solana Orca is among the top 10 fee producers on Solana and among the top five DEXs on the platform. The exchange produces $135K in daily fees, currently at a lower baseline compared to more active periods. Orca is the main venue for trading Solana liquid staking tokens ( LST ), though the market lags behind the meme token trend . The DEX locks in $263M , but deploys the activity in strategic price points for Solana LST. While the Orca project faces pressure from general market conditions, it retains its community and shows spikes of interest. During the latest rally, ORCA mindshare recovered by 30%, showing attention was still there for active tokens with sufficient liquidity. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
BitcoinWorld UK Inflation and Labour Data: Critical Signals Reshape Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Path LONDON, March 2025 – Recent economic indicators from the United Kingdom reveal significant shifts in inflationary pressures and labour market conditions, providing crucial signals for the Bank of England’s monetary policy trajectory. According to analysis from TD Securities, softer inflation readings combined with evolving employment data create a complex landscape for interest rate decisions in the coming quarters. These developments follow months of economic uncertainty and represent potential turning points for UK monetary policy. UK Inflation Trends: A Detailed Analysis of Recent Cooling The Office for National Statistics released February 2025 data showing consumer price inflation at 2.8%, marking the third consecutive month below 3%. This represents a substantial decline from the 4.2% reading recorded just six months earlier. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, similarly moderated to 3.1%. The services sector inflation, closely monitored by the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, decreased to 4.3% from its recent peak of 5.1%. Several factors contribute to this disinflationary trend. Global energy prices stabilized throughout late 2024, reducing imported inflation pressures. Supply chain disruptions that plagued the post-pandemic recovery largely resolved by mid-2024. Additionally, domestic demand moderation became evident in retail sales data and consumer confidence surveys. The Bank of England’s previous interest rate increases, totaling 525 basis points since December 2021, continue to work through the economy with typical monetary policy lags of 12-18 months. Comparative Inflation Metrics: UK vs. Major Economies Economy Current Inflation 6-Month Change Central Bank Target United Kingdom 2.8% -1.4% 2.0% Eurozone 2.1% -0.9% 2.0% United States 2.5% -1.1% 2.0% Canada 2.3% -0.8% 2.0% Labour Market Evolution: Beyond the Headline Unemployment Rate UK labour market data reveals nuanced developments that monetary policymakers must consider. The unemployment rate increased to 4.3% in the three months to January 2025, up from 3.8% a year earlier. However, this rise primarily reflects increased labour force participation rather than significant job destruction. Employment levels remained relatively stable at 33.1 million, while economic inactivity decreased to 20.8% of the working-age population. Wage growth presents a more complex picture. Regular pay growth excluding bonuses moderated to 5.6% in the latest quarter, down from 6.2% three months earlier. The private sector led this deceleration with wage growth falling to 5.4%, while public sector wage growth remained elevated at 6.1% due to previously negotiated settlements. Vacancy data shows continued cooling, with the ratio of vacancies to unemployed workers declining to 0.78 from its peak of 1.05 in mid-2023. Key labour market indicators include: Employment rate: 75.8% (unchanged quarter-on-quarter) Average weekly earnings: £673 (up 5.6% year-on-year) Real wage growth: 2.1% (first positive reading in two years) Underemployment rate: 7.2% (down from 7.8%) Bank of England Policy Implications: The Monetary Policy Committee’s Dilemma The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee faces challenging decisions amid these economic developments. The central bank must balance several competing considerations. Inflation remains above the 2% target but shows clear downward momentum. Labour market conditions suggest reduced wage pressure but still indicate tightness relative to historical averages. Financial markets currently price approximately 75 basis points of interest rate cuts for 2025, with the first reduction expected in August or September. TD Securities analysts highlight several factors the MPC will monitor closely. Services inflation persistence remains a concern despite recent moderation. The transmission of previous rate hikes continues to affect mortgage holders and businesses with variable-rate debt. Global economic conditions, particularly in major trading partners like the Eurozone and United States, influence export demand and imported inflation. Additionally, fiscal policy developments in the upcoming government budget could alter the economic outlook. Historical Context: Previous Monetary Policy Transitions The current situation resembles previous monetary policy transitions in several respects. The 2005-2006 period saw the Bank of England cutting rates after inflation moderated from elevated levels. Similarly, the 2011-2012 period featured cautious policy normalization following the global financial crisis. However, unique aspects distinguish the current environment. The scale of previous monetary stimulus during the pandemic era was unprecedented. Supply-side constraints have evolved differently than in previous cycles. Furthermore, geopolitical uncertainties create additional complications for policy decisions. Economic Impacts and Sectoral Considerations Different economic sectors respond variably to evolving monetary policy expectations. The housing market shows early signs of recovery as mortgage rates stabilize. Construction activity benefits from improved financing conditions. Consumer discretionary spending may increase as real wage growth turns positive. However, export-oriented sectors face challenges from sterling appreciation that could follow rate differential changes. Financial markets already price in policy changes. Government bond yields declined across the curve, particularly at the 2-5 year maturities most sensitive to monetary policy expectations. The sterling trade-weighted index depreciated approximately 3% since November 2024 as interest rate differentials narrowed. Equity markets responded positively, with the FTSE 100 gaining 8% year-to-date, outperforming many European indices. Business investment decisions increasingly incorporate monetary policy expectations. Survey data from the Confederation of British Industry indicates improved capital expenditure intentions. Manufacturing sector confidence improved according to Make UK reports. Service sector businesses report more stable input cost projections, supporting hiring and expansion plans. Expert Perspectives and Analytical Frameworks TD Securities economists employ multiple analytical frameworks to assess monetary policy implications. Their models incorporate traditional Phillips curve relationships between unemployment and inflation. Additionally, they analyze wage-price spirals and inflation expectations through survey data. The team examines monetary policy transmission through credit channels and asset price effects. International spillovers receive careful consideration given the UK’s open economy structure. Other financial institutions offer complementary perspectives. Goldman Sachs research emphasizes global synchronization of disinflation. Morgan Stanley analysis focuses on labour market rebalancing mechanisms. Barclays economists highlight regional variations within the UK economy. These diverse viewpoints collectively inform market expectations and policy anticipation. Academic research provides theoretical foundations for current policy considerations. Recent studies from the Bank of England’s own staff examine non-linear Phillips curves. International Monetary Fund working papers analyze optimal policy transitions. National Institute of Economic and Social Research publications explore distributional effects of monetary policy changes. This research ecosystem supports evidence-based policy decisions. Forward-Looking Indicators and Risk Assessment Several forward-looking indicators help anticipate future economic developments. Purchasing managers’ indices show manufacturing at 51.2 and services at 52.8, indicating moderate expansion. Consumer confidence measures improved but remain below long-term averages. Business investment intentions strengthened according to Deloitte surveys. Global leading indicators suggest synchronized but modest growth across major economies. Risk factors require careful monitoring. Geopolitical tensions could disrupt energy markets and supply chains. Domestic political developments may alter fiscal policy trajectories. Financial stability considerations remain relevant given elevated debt levels. Climate transition policies introduce additional economic uncertainties. Technological disruptions, particularly in artificial intelligence, create both opportunities and challenges for productivity and employment. The Bank of England’s communication strategy will prove crucial during this transition. Forward guidance must balance clarity with flexibility. Policy framework explanations help anchor inflation expectations. Transparency about data dependence builds credibility. Regular communication through monetary policy reports and press conferences maintains public understanding. Conclusion The evolving UK inflation and labour market landscape presents both opportunities and challenges for monetary policymakers. Recent data indicates meaningful progress toward price stability while labour market conditions gradually rebalance. The Bank of England must navigate this transition carefully, considering multiple economic indicators and risk factors. TD Securities analysis provides valuable insights into potential policy paths, emphasizing data dependence and risk management. As economic conditions continue evolving, monetary policy decisions will significantly influence the UK’s economic trajectory through 2025 and beyond. FAQs Q1: What is the current UK inflation rate and how does it compare to the Bank of England’s target? The UK inflation rate stood at 2.8% in February 2025, according to Office for National Statistics data. This remains above the Bank of England’s 2% target but represents significant progress from higher levels recorded in 2023 and early 2024. Q2: How have UK labour market conditions changed recently? UK labour market conditions show gradual rebalancing, with unemployment increasing to 4.3% primarily due to higher labour force participation. Wage growth moderated to 5.6% while employment levels remained stable, indicating a controlled cooling rather than sharp deterioration. Q3: What factors influence Bank of England interest rate decisions? The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee considers multiple factors including inflation trends, labour market conditions, wage growth, economic growth projections, global economic developments, financial stability considerations, and medium-term inflation expectations. Q4: When might the Bank of England begin cutting interest rates? Financial markets currently anticipate the first interest rate cut occurring in August or September 2025, based on inflation and labour market developments. However, the exact timing depends on continued progress toward the inflation target and labour market rebalancing. Q5: How do UK economic conditions compare with other major economies? The UK experiences similar disinflationary trends as other advanced economies but with slightly higher current inflation. Labour market conditions remain tighter than in many European counterparts but show similar rebalancing patterns. Monetary policy expectations align broadly with global central bank trends. This post UK Inflation and Labour Data: Critical Signals Reshape Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Path first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
XRP has experienced a significant decline over the past few months, yet interest in the asset (and the company behind it) remains high. In the following lines, we will touch upon the latest and most intriguing developments surrounding Ripple’s ecosystem. Investors Want In? Ripple’s global event, XRP Community Day, which is dedicated to the community of proponents, developers, and holders, was held last week. It brought together numerous executives and well-known figures from the crypto industry to discuss XRP’s growing usage, institutional adoption, and other trending topics. One participant was Rayhaneh Sharif-Askary (Head of Product & Research at Grayscale), who disclosed that advisors at the digital asset manager are “constantly asked” by clients about XRP. She added that, in some cases, Ripple’s cross-border token is the second-most discussed asset after Bitcoin (BTC). Grayscale is among the companies that introduced a spot XRP exchange-traded fund (ETF) with 100% exposure to the coin. This happened in late 2025, shortly after Canary Capital became the first to launch such a product in the United States. Grayscale’s investment vehicle, dubbed GXRP, drew strong interest after its debut, with daily net inflows topping $30 million on several occasions. However, over the past few weeks, the trend has shifted, with frequent negative netflows. Grayscale XRP ETF, Source: SoSoValue RLUSD Outperforms USDC on This Front Ripple’s stablecoin, called RLUSD, saw the light of day in December 2024 and has since made significant progress. The product, pegged 1:1 to the American dollar, gained support from many exchanges and renowned banking institutions, including the oldest US bank, BNY Mellon. Earlier this year, the London-based fintech company LMAX Group partnered with Ripple to integrate RLUSD into its institutional trading infrastructure, while Zand (a bank in the UAE) also embraced the token. RLUSD’s market cap has exceeded $1.5 billion, a significant milestone given its relatively short history. X user SMQKE revealed that the product has grown “much faster” than Circle’s USDC in its first year. XRP Price Outlook The past week has been quite turbulent for Ripple’s native cryptocurrency, with its valuation ranging from $1.35 to $1.66. Currently, it trades at approximately $1.45, representing a 2% daily decline. XRP Price, Source: CoinGecko It is important to note that the surge to the local high occurred over the weekend and was short-lived, prompting some analysts, such as Ali Martinez, to describe the 2-week candle closure as a gravestone doji. This is a candlestick pattern in which the price spikes during the period but closes near where it started, resembling an upside-down “T.” Martinez noted that the last time this formation appeared on the weekly chart, XRP’s price dropped by 46%. Other analysts take a more optimistic view. X user BitGuru believes XRP is “coming out of a prolonged downtrend” and is attempting to reclaim key support at approximately $1.50. Should it succeed, a recovery to $1.80-$2 is possible, they predicted. The post Ripple (XRP) News Today: February 17th appeared first on CryptoPotato .
BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Supply Analysis Reveals Critical 55% Profitability Threshold, Echoing 2022 Market Bottom Recent blockchain data reveals a critical development in cryptocurrency markets: the percentage of the total Bitcoin supply currently held at a profit has declined to just 55%. This significant metric, reported by analytics firm Solid Intel, indicates that approximately 10 million BTC are now held at a loss. Market analysts immediately noted the striking similarity to conditions observed during the November 2022 bear market bottom, creating important context for current Bitcoin price movements and investor sentiment. Bitcoin Supply Profitability Reaches Critical 55% Level Blockchain analytics provide crucial insights into market health through on-chain metrics. The “supply in profit” indicator measures the percentage of circulating Bitcoin whose last movement occurred at a lower price than the current market value. Consequently, when this percentage declines significantly, it signals widespread unrealized losses across the network. Currently, the metric shows only 55% of Bitcoin supply remains profitable for holders. This development represents a substantial shift from earlier market conditions. For comparison, during Bitcoin’s all-time high above $73,000 in March 2024, approximately 99% of the circulating supply was in profit. The rapid decline to current levels therefore indicates significant price depreciation and changing market dynamics. Analysts monitor this metric closely because it reflects the psychological state of market participants and potential selling pressure. Several factors contribute to the current profitability situation. First, Bitcoin’s price has experienced considerable volatility throughout 2024 and early 2025. Second, new investors entered the market during peak periods, purchasing at higher price points. Third, long-term holders continue to maintain their positions despite market fluctuations. These combined elements create the current supply distribution where nearly half of all Bitcoin sits at a loss. Historical Parallels to 2022 Bear Market Bottom The current 55% profitability level bears remarkable similarity to conditions during the November 2022 cryptocurrency market bottom. During that period, Bitcoin’s price reached approximately $15,500, marking the lowest point following the 2021 bull market. The supply in profit metric similarly declined to between 53-55% at that time, creating a clear historical parallel that market observers cannot ignore. Examining the 2022 comparison reveals important context. Following the November 2022 bottom, Bitcoin’s price began a gradual recovery that eventually led to the 2024 bull market. The similarity in supply profitability metrics suggests potential parallels in market structure, though historical patterns never guarantee future performance. Market analysts emphasize that while metrics may resemble previous bottoms, each market cycle possesses unique characteristics. The table below illustrates key comparisons between current conditions and the 2022 market bottom: Metric November 2022 Current (2025) BTC Supply in Profit 53-55% 55% Bitcoin Price ~$15,500 Varies by current data Market Sentiment Extremely bearish Cautiously bearish Trading Volume Elevated Moderate to elevated This historical context provides valuable perspective for investors and analysts. While similarities exist, differences in macroeconomic conditions, regulatory environments, and institutional adoption create distinct market backdrops for each period. Expert Analysis of On-Chain Metrics Blockchain analytics firms like Glassnode, CryptoQuant, and Solid Intel provide the data infrastructure for these observations. Their on-chain analysis tools track wallet movements, supply distribution, and profitability metrics across the Bitcoin network. According to their methodologies, the “supply in profit” calculation involves comparing the current price against the price at which each UTXO (unspent transaction output) last moved. Market analysts interpret these metrics within broader contexts. For instance, when the supply in profit declines significantly, it often indicates capitulation events where discouraged investors sell at a loss. Historically, such periods have frequently preceded market recoveries, though timing remains unpredictable. The current 55% level suggests substantial unrealized losses exist across the network, potentially limiting further selling pressure from distressed holders. Several additional on-chain metrics provide complementary insights: Realized Price: The average price at which all circulating Bitcoin last moved MVRV Ratio: Compares market value to realized value, indicating profit/loss conditions UTXO Age Bands: Shows distribution of Bitcoin across different holding periods Exchange Flows: Tracks movements between wallets and trading platforms These combined metrics create a comprehensive picture of market health beyond simple price movements. The convergence of multiple indicators toward levels similar to previous market bottoms warrants careful attention from market participants. Market Implications and Investor Psychology The psychological impact of widespread unrealized losses influences market behavior significantly. When large portions of the supply enter loss positions, several potential outcomes emerge. First, weak hands may capitulate and sell, creating downward pressure. Second, long-term believers often accumulate during such periods, providing buying support. Third, the reduced profitability can decrease selling motivation among holders waiting for recovery. Historical patterns show that extreme readings in supply profitability often coincide with market turning points. However, analysts caution against simplistic interpretations. Market bottoms typically form through complex processes involving multiple factors beyond single metrics. The current 55% reading suggests the market approaches historically significant levels, but confirmation requires additional signals and time. Institutional investors particularly monitor these metrics for strategic positioning. Large asset managers and corporate treasuries consider on-chain data alongside traditional financial indicators when making allocation decisions. The transparency of blockchain data provides advantages over traditional markets where similar metrics remain opaque or delayed. Broader Cryptocurrency Market Context The Bitcoin profitability metric exists within a complex ecosystem of interrelated factors. Macroeconomic conditions significantly influence cryptocurrency markets, with interest rates, inflation data, and geopolitical events creating headwinds or tailwinds. Regulatory developments across major jurisdictions additionally shape market structure and participant behavior. Technological advancements continue evolving the Bitcoin ecosystem. Layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network improve transaction capabilities, while developments in mining efficiency and sustainability address environmental concerns. These fundamental improvements occur alongside price fluctuations, creating a multifaceted development narrative. The cryptocurrency market’s maturation brings increased correlation with traditional finance while maintaining unique characteristics. Institutional adoption through ETFs and corporate treasuries creates new dynamics in supply and demand. These evolving relationships make historical comparisons valuable but imperfect guides to future developments. Conclusion The decline in profitable Bitcoin supply to 55% represents a significant market development with clear historical parallels to the 2022 bear market bottom. This Bitcoin supply analysis provides crucial insights into current market conditions, investor psychology, and potential future directions. While similarities to previous cycles offer valuable context, unique factors in each market period require careful consideration. The transparency of blockchain data continues providing unprecedented visibility into market structure, enabling more informed analysis for all participants. Monitoring these metrics alongside broader market developments remains essential for understanding cryptocurrency market dynamics. FAQs Q1: What does “supply in profit” mean for Bitcoin? The “supply in profit” metric shows the percentage of circulating Bitcoin whose last movement occurred at a lower price than current market value. It indicates how much of the supply is held at unrealized gains versus losses. Q2: Why is the 55% profitability level significant? This level is significant because it matches levels seen during the November 2022 bear market bottom. Historically, such extreme readings have often preceded market recoveries, though they don’t guarantee them. Q3: How does Solid Intel calculate this metric? Solid Intel and similar analytics firms compare the current Bitcoin price against the price at which each UTXO (unspent transaction output) last moved on the blockchain. This creates an aggregate percentage of profitable versus unprofitable supply. Q4: Does a low profitability percentage always indicate a market bottom? Not necessarily. While historically low profitability percentages have coincided with market bottoms, they can persist or decline further. Multiple confirming indicators and fundamental factors should be considered alongside this single metric. Q5: How might this affect Bitcoin’s price going forward? Widespread unrealized losses can decrease selling pressure as holders wait for recovery, potentially creating support. However, if forced liquidations occur, it could increase selling. The metric reflects existing conditions rather than predicting future movements with certainty. This post Bitcoin Supply Analysis Reveals Critical 55% Profitability Threshold, Echoing 2022 Market Bottom first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
BitcoinWorld Polish MiCA Veto Sparks Critical Regulatory Uncertainty for EU Crypto Integration WARSAW, Poland – In a decisive move with far-reaching implications, Polish President Karol Nawrocki has exercised his presidential veto power for the second time, blocking legislation designed to align Poland’s national laws with the European Union’s landmark Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. This critical decision, reported by Cointelegraph on April 15, 2025, represents a significant obstacle to regulatory harmonization within the EU’s single market and creates immediate uncertainty for cryptocurrency businesses operating in Central Europe’s largest economy. The president previously rejected similar alignment legislation in December 2024, establishing a clear pattern of resistance to specific aspects of the EU’s comprehensive crypto framework. Polish MiCA Veto Creates Immediate Regulatory Vacuum President Nawrocki’s repeated rejection of MiCA alignment legislation establishes a tangible regulatory gap within Poland’s financial ecosystem. Consequently, cryptocurrency service providers face continued legal ambiguity while operating in the Polish market. The European Union officially implemented its comprehensive MiCA framework in December 2024, creating a unified regulatory approach across most member states. However, Poland’s failure to transpose these rules into national law means Polish authorities cannot fully enforce the regulation’s provisions. This situation potentially disadvantages Polish consumers who lack the full protections afforded elsewhere in the EU. Meanwhile, cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers must navigate conflicting regulatory expectations between EU institutions and Polish national authorities. The veto specifically impacts several key MiCA provisions including: Licensing requirements for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) Consumer protection measures for stablecoin issuers Market abuse prevention mechanisms for trading platforms Disclosure obligations for white papers and marketing materials Understanding the EU’s MiCA Regulation Framework The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation represents the European Union’s most ambitious attempt to create a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets. The European Parliament formally adopted MiCA in April 2023 after nearly three years of legislative development. The regulation establishes uniform rules across all 27 EU member states, aiming to protect investors while fostering innovation. MiCA categorizes crypto-assets into distinct types including utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), and electronic money tokens (EMTs). Each category faces specific regulatory requirements regarding issuance, trading, and custody. The framework mandates that all crypto-asset service providers obtain authorization from national competent authorities, creating a passporting system that allows licensed firms to operate across the entire EU single market. Key MiCA Implementation Timeline Date Milestone Status June 2023 MiCA officially published in EU Official Journal Completed December 2024 Most MiCA provisions become applicable Implemented June 2025 Stablecoin provisions become fully applicable Pending December 2025 Full MiCA implementation deadline for member states Pending Expert Analysis of Poland’s Regulatory Position Legal scholars specializing in EU financial law note that Poland’s position creates complex jurisdictional questions. “When a member state fails to implement EU legislation properly, the European Commission can initiate infringement proceedings,” explains Dr. Elena Vasquez, Professor of European Financial Law at the University of Warsaw. “However, the Commission typically allows reasonable time for implementation before taking formal action. Poland’s repeated vetoes suggest deeper concerns about specific MiCA provisions rather than simple administrative delay.” Industry analysts observe that Poland has historically maintained a cautious approach toward cryptocurrency regulation, balancing innovation support with consumer protection priorities. The Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) has previously issued warnings about cryptocurrency risks while simultaneously exploring blockchain applications for traditional finance. Potential Impacts on Poland’s Cryptocurrency Ecosystem The presidential veto creates immediate practical consequences for various market participants. Polish cryptocurrency exchanges now operate in a regulatory limbo, uncertain whether to comply with MiCA standards or existing national regulations. International platforms serving Polish customers face similar confusion about applicable rules. Furthermore, cryptocurrency projects based in Poland may reconsider their operational locations, potentially relocating to other EU jurisdictions with clearer regulatory environments. Consumer protection represents another significant concern, as Polish investors might not receive the same safeguards as their counterparts in neighboring Germany or the Czech Republic. The regulatory uncertainty could also affect institutional adoption, with traditional financial institutions likely postponing cryptocurrency integration until clearer rules emerge. Market data indicates several observable effects already: Increased compliance costs for businesses serving multiple EU markets Delayed market entry for international cryptocurrency firms Reduced investor confidence among Polish retail participants Competitive disadvantage for Polish blockchain startups Comparative Analysis with Other EU Member States Poland’s approach contrasts sharply with several other EU members who have embraced MiCA implementation. Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has already begun processing license applications under the new framework. Similarly, France’s Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has established clear pathways for MiCA compliance. Even smaller member states like Malta and Lithuania have moved decisively to align their national regulations with the EU framework. This divergence creates potential regulatory arbitrage opportunities, with businesses possibly favoring jurisdictions offering clearer guidelines. However, the European Commission emphasizes that consistent implementation remains crucial for the single market’s integrity. The Commission can ultimately refer non-compliant member states to the European Court of Justice, though this represents a lengthy process typically reserved for persistent violations. The Political Context Behind Poland’s Regulatory Stance Political observers note that Poland’s MiCA resistance occurs within a broader context of EU-Polish relations. Recent years have witnessed tensions regarding judicial independence, media freedom, and other rule-of-law matters. Some analysts interpret the MiCA vetoes as part of Poland’s assertion of national sovereignty in policy areas where EU competence remains contested. The Polish government has previously expressed concerns about specific MiCA provisions, particularly those granting extensive supervisory powers to EU authorities. Additionally, domestic political considerations might influence the timing and manner of implementation. Poland faces parliamentary elections later in 2025, potentially making cryptocurrency regulation a more politically sensitive issue than in other member states. Pathways Forward for Polish Crypto Regulation Several potential resolutions exist for the current impasse. The Polish parliament could override the presidential veto with a three-fifths majority vote, though achieving this threshold presents political challenges. Alternatively, legislators might draft revised legislation addressing the president’s specific concerns while maintaining alignment with MiCA’s core requirements. A third possibility involves temporary measures allowing partial implementation while negotiations continue. The European Commission might offer technical assistance or transitional arrangements to facilitate smoother alignment. Industry associations have called for urgent dialogue between Polish authorities, EU institutions, and market participants to develop workable solutions. Many stakeholders emphasize that regulatory clarity benefits all parties by reducing legal risks and fostering responsible innovation. Conclusion President Karol Nawrocki’s second veto of MiCA alignment legislation creates significant regulatory uncertainty for Poland’s cryptocurrency sector at a critical juncture in European digital finance integration. This Polish MiCA veto highlights ongoing tensions between national sovereignty and EU harmonization efforts within financial regulation. The decision delays full consumer protection implementation and places Polish cryptocurrency businesses at a potential competitive disadvantage. As the December 2025 implementation deadline approaches, stakeholders across Europe will monitor whether Poland develops alternative compliance pathways or faces potential infringement proceedings. The situation underscores the complex balancing act between innovation facilitation and regulatory oversight in rapidly evolving digital asset markets. FAQs Q1: What exactly did the Polish president veto? President Karol Nawrocki vetoed national legislation designed to transpose the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation into Polish law. This marks his second rejection of such alignment legislation, having previously vetoed a similar bill in December 2024. Q2: How does this veto affect cryptocurrency users in Poland? Polish cryptocurrency users may not receive the full consumer protections mandated by MiCA, including specific disclosure requirements, liability rules for service providers, and safeguards against market manipulation. They also face potential limitations accessing services from EU-based providers who require MiCA compliance. Q3: Can cryptocurrency businesses still operate legally in Poland? Yes, businesses can operate under existing Polish regulations, but they cannot benefit from MiCA’s EU passporting system that allows licensed firms to serve customers across all member states. They also face uncertainty about which regulatory standards ultimately apply. Q4: What happens if Poland doesn’t implement MiCA by the deadline? The European Commission could initiate infringement proceedings against Poland for failing to fulfill its obligations as an EU member state. This process could eventually lead to financial penalties if Poland persistently refuses implementation. Q5: Are other EU countries having difficulty implementing MiCA? Most member states are proceeding with implementation, though at varying paces. Some countries requested transitional arrangements for specific provisions, but Poland represents the most significant case of outright legislative resistance through presidential veto. This post Polish MiCA Veto Sparks Critical Regulatory Uncertainty for EU Crypto Integration first appeared on BitcoinWorld .
A simple copy and paste error caused an unlucky trader to lose $600,000 today, February 17, after blockchain security firm Cyvers discovered the latest incident in what has become a nonstop wave of address poisoning attacks this year. Cyvers Alerts discovered the attack using its real-time blockchain monitoring system and found out that the victim was targeted using zero-value transfers. Zero-value transfers refer to a technique where attackers send fake transactions to a victim’s wallet to contaminate their transaction history with a similar address. Once the vectors have been planted, the poisoned address sits in the victim’s history, waiting for the moment they try a quick copy and paste instead of manually inputing or verifying each character of the wallet’s address. Typically, victims lose all the assets involved in that transfer because of the irreversibility of blockchain transfers. $600k loss joins avalanche of address poisoning attacks in 2026 The $600,000 incident is one of many. Address poisoning attacks have escalated rapidly in frequency and scale, and this year alone has already produced several high-profile losses that paint an alarming picture of the threats the industry currently faces. In December 2025, a crypto trader lost $50 million in USDT after copying a fake address from their history, the second-largest address poisoning loss ever recorded. Apparently, the victim had withdrawn the funds from Binance, sent a $50 test transaction to the correct address, and then minutes later, copied the poisoned address for a full $50 million transfer . The attacker then converted the stolen USDT to DAI tokens and then approximately 16,690 ETH within 30 minutes, channeling most of it through Tornado Cash to hide their trail. The victim offered a $1 million bounty for recovery of 98% of the funds, and threatened criminal charges if the terms were not met. January 2026 was no different. On January 16, a victim lost $514,000 in USDT after sending a $5,000 test transaction to a poisoned address ending in “f3e6F”, which was a near identical match to their intended recipient ending in “D3E6F”, before following it up with the full transfer minutes later. Two weeks later, another victim lost $12.25 million after sending 4,556 ETH to an attacker-controlled address copied from a contaminated transaction history. ScamSniffer, who flagged this incident , observed that the two addresses were basically identical in the visible characters, with the only difference lost in the hidden middle sections that most wallets abbreviate. This month’s victim has now joined a pattern of losses that has cost users millions of dollars in less than 3 months, primarily due to more cunning attacks and a user base that still relies on abbreviated address displays and copy-paste habits for routine transactions. Over one million poisoning attempts on Ethereum daily According to reports by Cyvers specialists, over one million poisoning attempts are made every single day on the Ethereum network alone. Another study discovered at least seven distinct attack groups actively running address poisoning campaigns on Ethereum, with some groups reusing their fake addresses on both Ethereum and the Binance Smart Chain at the same time. The study confirmed that attackers prefer to target high-value wallets with frequent transaction histories, and that they usually run statistical analyses of USDT and USDC balances to figure out the most profitable potential victims before deploying their fake transactions. “More users and institutions are leveraging automated tools for crypto transactions, some of which may not have built-in verification mechanisms to detect poisoned addresses” Cyvers’ CEO stated. He added that “the growing sophistication of attackers and the lack of pre-transaction security measures” are the primary drivers of the increase. Industry stakeholders have also started voicing their opinions. Some have publicly called on wallet developers to block poisoned addresses by default following the $50 million loss in December. As Cryptopolitan reported on December 24, 2025, CZ proposed a blueprint to protect cryptocurrency users from fraudulent transactions. “Our industry should be able to completely eradicate this type of poison attacks, and protect our users,” CZ wrote on Binance’s social platform. “All wallets should simply check if a receiving address is a ‘poison address’, and block the user.” Other wallet providers are now exploring pre-execution risk assessments that simulate a transaction before it is signed, and show users exactly where their funds will go before asking them to confirm. Some researchers also advocated for whitelisting frequently used addresses directly in the wallet’s settings to eliminate reliance on transaction histories entirely. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.